Talk:Sign
Latest comment: 12 November 2009 by Cipriano in topic Merge
Merge
Any objections to merging these mundane articles to Zelda Definitions? Axiomist (talk) 04:25, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
- I object. These things are important enough to have their own article RupeeLord 04:56, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
- It wouldn't have to be permanent, It could go there, be expanded and then unmerged. I think it's a good idea considering that a new game is upcoming and most of the articles will be rapidly expanded. And those that aren't would have a nice little place there without pesky improve or stub tags. Axiomist (talk) 05:19, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
- Gonna have to agree with Axi. It's a tiny, pathetic page. Signs aren't particularly important, and I think that they'd be better suited to the Definitions page.User:Justin ZW/sig 18:42, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
- Well, Neo, I think signs are important to the series, especially for first-time players, but not important enough to warrant their own article. MERGE EM!— ciprianotalk 03:53, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
- Gonna have to agree with Axi. It's a tiny, pathetic page. Signs aren't particularly important, and I think that they'd be better suited to the Definitions page.User:Justin ZW/sig 18:42, 4 October 2009 (UTC)