Talk:Link's Awakening Trading Sequence

This page is full of nonsense. No offense, but I don't think an encyclopedia would say stuff like, say, on wood, "Wood is hard! Isn't that somethin'?" Does the page use quotes from the game or are these made up? Darqlink51 15:39, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

Those quotes are the actual in-game quotes. They are not made up. There is only one thing on this entire page that should not be there. It will be removed.Emma ^(Talk) 16:25, June 28, 2008 (UTC)

No, I mean, for example, the non-quote part of the article. I accidentally used the word "quote". Like the "what the heck are you supposed to do with that?!!" part. Darqlink51 20:34, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

Other than the specific sentence you mentioned, this article is fine. Don't over-exaggerate things in the future.Emma ^(Talk) 22:36, June 28, 2008 (UTC)

Merging Items into this page

I think the items that you're trading should become redirect pages which link to this page. I'm in the process of adding the "merge" templates. Anyone agree?—Justin^(Talk) 18:58, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

I do support this, but given the intensity of the debates on merging of late. I say to wait for others to opine before moving forward. Axiomist (talk) 19:05, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

I'm not doing anything until I'm granted administrative approval. Also, I've just finished placing the template on the correct pages. I had to edit it a bunch of times, though, since some pages aren't even linked to the correct item '-_-

Anyways, let's see what comes up. If this turns out to be popular, I'll go ahead and suggest merging the other trading sequence items. If not, I won't waste my time.—Justin^(Talk) 19:09, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

I'm not supportive of these pages being merged. I think most of the pages up for merging are of a substantial length (long enough to remain on their own page) and could possibly be expanded on.Mandi ^Talk 19:15, October 4, 2009 (UTC)

I think that the pages that were already merged with this long ago should be split. And merging any more pages is a bad mistake. Most are of a good length and have chances for expansion. It would be best to keep everything on this page only a short summary and have each page exist seperately with more information. That is what people want to see. Not big, massive pages that are hard to follow.Emma ^(Talk) 19:27, October 4, 2009 (UTC)

I agree with Matt, one reason being that there is a template which directs you to every item in the trade sequence.User:Austin2862/sig 19:31, 4 October 2009 (UTC)