Talk:Eye Reefs
Merging the X-Eye Reefs
I think we should merge all of the X-Eye reefs into one page. They're all pretty minor islands with no story value, and they all do the same thing. It would be very easy to put them all together into one article. Who agrees?—Justin(Talk) 19:26, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
- I'm cool with this merge. While you work on it, I suggest adding the coordinate data for where each island is found to fill the sections a little more. The blank space between each one will be a bit more obvious otherwise. Other than that I see no real way to beef up these articles. Another fine example of articles that work better together than isolated. Axiomist (talk) 02:47, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
- Alright. Let me try to get on a real computer instead of this crappy Wii. If I can't, I'll get it done tomorrow (and I can promise that.) Could you elaborate on the coordinates a little more, though?—Justin(Talk) 02:55, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
- Well get a few more comments on before proceeding to merge. Afterall we want to be able to show that it had support later on if any one decides to start splitting articles(Nayru forbid this, I beg you). But the coordinates can be found in this map, [[File:Greatsea.gif]]. Axiomist (talk) 03:00, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
- Alright. Let me try to get on a real computer instead of this crappy Wii. If I can't, I'll get it done tomorrow (and I can promise that.) Could you elaborate on the coordinates a little more, though?—Justin(Talk) 02:55, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
HEY! Don't even SAY things like that! XD Ahhhh but seriously, I'll wait. In this case, I'll just do it tomorrow. Everyone has until around 10:30AM Eastern Time tomorrow until the merge happens. If no one responds, I do it. I'd prefer some agreements, though. Put your two cents in while you can! And I got the coordinates down, Axi. I'll...try to use them to beef the article up, but...I think they're too ridiculously minor to grow very much. The most I can do besides that is add what treasure charts can be found on them and where the resulting treasure will be.—Justin(Talk) 03:06, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
- I'm in favour of this merge. The articles are small, and one combined page will look better and be much more substantial. • Pete ♪ | ♫ 07:10, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
- It's now 10:30AM Eastern, so I'm merging. However, I'm very hungry, so I'm running to the store to pick up some pizza rolls. That's another 15-30 minutes for people to agree/disagree. Hurry up and get your word in! I don't have all day to do this!—Justin(Talk) 15:31, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
- Dude, if you don't bring one back for me, I'm rescinding my vote. • Pete ♪ | ♫ 15:53, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
- I bought TWO bags, Petenu! :3 I also bought a 2-liter of Mountain Dew Voltage. In any case, it's MERGE time.—Justin(Talk) 16:11, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
- I'm late on this, but I support this as well. Great job in the merge, Neo. User:Cipriano 119/sig 17:24, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
- I bought TWO bags, Petenu! :3 I also bought a 2-liter of Mountain Dew Voltage. In any case, it's MERGE time.—Justin(Talk) 16:11, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
- Dude, if you don't bring one back for me, I'm rescinding my vote. • Pete ♪ | ♫ 15:53, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
- It's now 10:30AM Eastern, so I'm merging. However, I'm very hungry, so I'm running to the store to pick up some pizza rolls. That's another 15-30 minutes for people to agree/disagree. Hurry up and get your word in! I don't have all day to do this!—Justin(Talk) 15:31, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
Thanks. Even if it's already done, it helps to have more support in case anyone ever decides to break the unspoken code and...split articles.—Justin(Talk) 23:53, 8 November 2009 (UTC)