User talk:HeroOfTheWinds10@legacy41959235

From Zelda Wiki, the Zelda encyclopedia
Latest comment: 26 December 2008 by Ando1400@legacy41958204 in topic Recent Tingle edit
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Hello

Zwlogo2dsmall.png
Hi there, HeroOfTheWinds10@legacy41959235, and welcome to Zelda Wiki! Why not check out the community hub? To find out what's been going on recently at the wiki and what articles users are editing right now, head to the Recent Changes. For general wiki-related discussion and questions, head over to the Discussion Center. Also, for wiki usage and policy help, check out our Help Guide. We hope you enjoy the wiki. Thanks!
— The Zelda Wiki Staff

Your recent vote

Hi there. We've recently had some discussion since you've made your vote to Link at Sea on the Featured Picture Nomination page. I was wondering if perhaps you could look at the "Comments" section and see if it affects your vote at all? The short of it is basically summed up as such: You're voting on the image, not the thumbnail, so the thumbnail being difficult to see isn't really a great reason to oppose a nomination (though if you just don't care for the image, that's okay!). —Ando (talk) 05:09, 8 November 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Question

If the nomination of a featured article that you voted for is terminated... can you vote again?

Sorry, no. You can only vote for an article once per month. It is the rules.Emma (Talk) 19:33, November 12, 2008 (UTC)

Vote

You seem to like to oppose things. An image not being interesting to you is not a valid reason to oppose it. Also, you should not vote against the image you like the least. We have negated your most recent vote. Try to be careful in the future.Emma (Talk) 02:01, December 3, 2008 (UTC)

I NOW understand that it is not a good reason to oppose a picture for that reason. About your first comment... I have only opposed TWO featured picture nominations. --HeroOfTheWinds10 19:43, 3 December 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Recent Tingle edit

Hey, your recent edit to the Tingle article is what we would consider unconstructive -- replacing entire articles with what is (sorry to say it) essentially nonsense is looked down upon heavily. Quite often it might actually be taken as vandalism. What exactly was the motivation behind that edit? —Ando (talk) 23:16, 26 December 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Call it a farewell. I'm sorry Ando.--HeroOfTheWinds10 23:19, 26 December 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I'm sorry too. That was unacceptable behavior, regardless of the motive. I hate to do this, but you've been blocked for one (1) day for vandalism and harassment. —Ando (talk) 23:21, 26 December 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]