Talk:Wind Gods

Merging with Cyclos and Zephos articles

I believe the Cyclos and Zephos pages should be merged into this page. Having all three of these articles makes for a lot of redundant information. Plus, all the articles are practically stubs without much possibility for expansion. It seems like a no-brainer to me. What say you: aye or nay? Hylian King 18:39, 12 September 2010 (EDT)

Now that I think of it, another solution would be to just delete this page and turn it into a disambiguation page... Hylian King 07:20, 13 September 2010 (EDT)

Disambiguation page conversion for sure.Emma ^(Talk) 11:26, September 13, 2010 (UTC)

Same. I didn't even know we had this page and when I saw it, I thought it was pretty useless. So yeah, it would be better to turn this into a disambig. Dany36 11:19, 13 September 2010 (EDT)

Disambig possibly... Or since the other two are pretty short we can merge em... dunno. - AtrumLevis  (My Talk Page) (My Contributions) 21:20, 14 September 2010 (EDT)

I'd have to agree with the diambig conversion. Autydi 23:20, 15 September 2010 (EDT)

Yea, the Zephos and Cyclos articles could be merged later on, but I think they look ok the way they are, all cute with refs and all. I'm for the disambig... this article is useless. — cipriano^talk 02:05, 16 September 2010 (EDT)

Done and done. Hylian King 10:02, 18 September 2010 (EDT)