Talk:Spiritual Stone
Latest comment: 9 April 2013 by KafeiDallab in topic Fourth Spiritual Stone
Why does this page have links that redirect to itself?!?--Claire 19:36, 4 March 2008 (EST)
- Because either a) whoever redirected the links didn't think to remove those very links from the article or b) someone didn't know that they redirected and added the links to the article. Just remove links that redirect to themselves if you find any. --Ando (Talk) 20:04, 4 March 2008 (EST)
- Because the article was created from 4 separate pages. In November, all three Spiritual Stones were in individual articles, which were merged here. The person who did that forgot to change/remove the links. Like Ando says, feel free change them as required :) —Adam (talk) 13:14, 5 March 2008 (EST)
Anyone maybe wanna mention that the third-generation Pokémon games were Ruby, Sapphire and Emerald? Togepikachu 10:57, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
- I don't think that has much importance to the Spiritual stones... We could mention the connection to the RGB color system that was a common root, but I don't believe either series influenced the other. KafeiDallab 13:14, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
- I agree. I don't think that it's very likely that the Pokémon series was influenced by the Zelda series, especially seeing as they aren't developed by the same people. Plus, Ocarina of Time was released almost seven years before Pokémon Emerald, and I'm pretty sure that the trio of a Ruby, Sapphire and Emerald have been used in other works too. There isn't enough of a connection to make this particularly notable. Dannyboy601Talk 14:32, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
Fourth Spiritual Stone
The Trivia section mentions a hack that causes the spiritual stones to merge into one when placed on the pedestal. There's no citation noted, and I've never heard of such a thing before. Does anyone know if this is fact, or wishful fiction? KafeiDallab 13:22, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
- There's a video on Youtube about it here. Thanks for pointing this out though. Dannyboy601Talk 14:32, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
- Ah, so they just move to the same spot, rather than revealing an unused model or something. I think I'll modify the note to include that. Thanks for the link! KafeiDallab 14:37, 9 April 2013 (UTC)