Talk:Link and the Portal of Doom

Canon

Should this be tagged as non-canon or ambiguously canon? I had honestly never even heard of this book before now.Ganondorfdude11 21:45, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

I don't know. I'd like to think of it as non-canon, but perhaps it should be ambiguously canon, since that's what it really is. Same with me. I'm tempted to buy the book to add to my collection... —Alter  ^{{T C B H }} 01:40, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

Well considering the description of it completely contradicts the game, I'd say it is no more canon than the manga. Navi left Link after the events of Ocarina of Time. This book contradicts that. I'd say non-canon.Emma ^(Talk) 01:55, August 29, 2009 (UTC)

Missed that part. Thanks for pointing it out, Matt. I'll undo that edit. —Alter  ^{{T C B H }} 02:07, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for all of those improvements. This is actually a respectable page now. —Alter  ^{{T C B H }} 04:37, 10 September 2009 (UTC)