Category talk:Ikana

From Zelda Wiki, the Zelda encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

What determines what fits in this category? "The Stalfos and Stalchildren" doesn't seem to make sense, especially considering living people like Pamela and Shiro, or even structures like Ancient Castle of Ikana are included. Would places like Ikana Graveyard and Ikana Valley go here as well...? --Douken 05:31, 12 September 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

That description really doesn't make any sense at all... :/ In fact, I'm not really sure we need this category; after all, if we have a category for all Ikana-related material, what about the Southern Swamp or the Great Bay, which have just as much -- if not MORE -- material than Ikana? I'm voting for a deletion of the category. Anyone else? If this fails, then we can discuss how to use it. —Ando (talk) 17:07, 12 September 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I personally think we should keep it, since I think it apparently refers more to the culture, race and kingdom of Ikana (similar to Category:Deku), than just the geographical area of Ikana. The description just needs to be clarified somewhat. --Douken 18:34, 12 September 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Yeah, that makes sense, I guess. Perhaps we should make the description something more along the lines of "This category contains all information relating to the Ikana region of Majora's Mask." or something similar. —Ando (talk) 19:09, 15 September 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
This category still carries the delete tag. Someone wanna clean up as discussed above, or remove the category from use so it can be deleted? Thanks! Adam [ talk ] 10:31, 13 December 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

alright to start this disscussion off ill start by saying that the ikana are the doplgangers to the shieks and just as the royal family was served by them the king of ikana was served by the ninjas that are the ikana —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dax324 (talk) Current revision as of 07:33, 2 May 2009

ZW Off-Topic Icon.svg
Off-Topic Messages
This series of messages doesn't relate to improving the page that this talk page corresponds to. Zelda Wiki is an encyclopedia, not a forum, so please direct these messages to the Zelda Universe formus or to the #general on Discord.

Ikana Kingdom

I move that "Ikana Kingdom" needs it's own page; Ikana leads to a disambiguation page where you can choose from the Ancient Castle of Ikana, Ikana Canyon, or Igos du Ikana. None of these pages have much to do with the Kingdom itself as much as they do the gaming aspects of Ikana (strategies and enemies and such), and list close to nothing about its history. Admittedly, there isn't a whole heckuvalot to go on, only little quotes here, mentioning it there... but I still believe it deserves its own article, and I personally find the topic of the ancient Kingdom fascinating. Thoughts?? Embyr 75 20:51, 3 May 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I agree with you. I, too, think it's worthy of its own page. Alter  {T C B H } 21:20, May 3, 2010 (UTC)
Yeah, a while ago I thought how the Ikana kingdom could use its own page, but I never got around to gathering all of the known information about it and setting up a page for it. Maybe we could start one now to at least get it going. Dany36 22:05, 3 May 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I got a stub going (see Ikana Kingdom), but I don't really know what I'm doing wikicoding wise. Everyone please jump in and correct me. =) Embyr 75 22:18, 3 May 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]
You're doing pretty good, don't worry too much about it. Content is more important than the wikicoding... Wikicoding is done in seconds, while writing up the content takes up more time! XD Dany36 22:36, 3 May 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]