Talk:Sand Rod: Difference between revisions

From Zelda Wiki, the Zelda encyclopedia
Latest comment: 27 April 2015 by Pixel in topic Merge
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 10: Line 10:
:::I am also for this merge, for all the good reasons already listed. --{{:User:Pixel/sig}} 13:52, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
:::I am also for this merge, for all the good reasons already listed. --{{:User:Pixel/sig}} 13:52, 27 April 2015 (UTC)


:::Honestly, I thought they '''were''' the same item, so I was surprised there were separate articles. The sandbox looks good, Kasuto. I support the merge! –{{subst:User:EzloSpirit/Sig}} 14:05, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
:::Honestly, I thought they ''were'' the same item, so I was surprised there were separate articles. The sandbox looks good, Kasuto. I support the merge! –{{:User:EzloSpirit/sig}} 14:05, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:10, 27 April 2015

Merge

Putting up a merge template. It's Japanese name is Sand Rod so having two articles is kinda redundant--Lego3400 (talk) 08:04, 30 November 2013 (UTC).Reply[reply]

Yeah, the game's website doesn't even say it's new (while it does for the Tornado Rod). And since it's also considered the same item in Japan, I'm for merging too. --Technickal (talk) 13:38, 26 June 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]
This is reviving an old discussion, but I agree that they should be merged. They are functionally identical, it's pretty clear that they're meant to be the same.
EDIT: I've gone ahead and drafted up a sandbox to show how it would look like as a merged article. User:Pakkun/sig 08:15, 27 April 2015 (UTC)


I am also for this merge, for all the good reasons already listed. ---Pixel TC 13:52, 27 April 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Honestly, I thought they were the same item, so I was surprised there were separate articles. The sandbox looks good, Kasuto. I support the merge! –User:EzloSpirit/sig 14:05, 27 April 2015 (UTC)