Zelda Wiki:Featured Article Nomination: Difference between revisions

From Zelda Wiki, the Zelda encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 23: Line 23:


{{oppose}}
{{oppose}}
 
#Well, the article is well written and organized, and has lots of references. It looks interesting enough to be featured.
 
{{neutral}}
{{neutral}}


='''<small>Previously Featured Articles</small>'''=
='''<small>Previously Featured Articles</small>'''=

Revision as of 19:37, 2 May 2009

Where to start.
Getting
Involved

Zelda Wiki's discussion center
Discussion
Center

Image request and support center.
Image
Requests

Zelda Wiki's book of knowledge and regulations.
Help
Guide


Here, users can nominate and vote for Zelda Wiki's next featured article. Any article worthy of being featured exemplifies the Wiki's quality standards, and goes above and beyond what is expected in a normal encyclopedia entry. Featured articles should:

  1. Have exceptionally fluid American English grammar and spelling.
  2. Be lengthy, yet detailed.
  3. Be well organized (as in subdivisions).
  4. Cite sources, and cite them properly.
  5. Be properly categorized.
  6. Contain the most up-to-date information possible.
  7. Have no template requesting improvement, merging, deletion, or any template that may in some way state the article is not of excellent quality. In this respect, there should be no duplicate of the nominated article, nor should the article be a duplicate of another page.
  8. NOT be copied from Wikipedia, or from any site that does not run the Wiki, under any circumstances!

For help on the correct format used to add nominations or votes, see the Featured Content Help.

Rules:
Scoring and conditions for passing a nomination:

  1. All nominations start with an initial score of zero.
  2. A supporting vote adds 1 to the score.
  3. An opposing vote subtracts 1 from the score.
  4. An article needs to achieve a score of +5 within 4 months of the nomination date in order to be featured.
  5. A nomination automatically fails if the score drops to -3.

Voting:

  1. You may only vote once on any particular article.
  2. You may not vote on any articles you have nominated.
  3. Votes should be added beneath the relevant header (either support or opposition), with # at the beginning of the line. The current score must be updated to reflect this new vote.
  4. Supporting votes should include a brief message stating why the article should be featured.
  5. Opposing votes must specify how the article fails to meet one or more of the qualifying criteria described above.
  6. All votes MUST be signed using ~~~~ If you do not sign, your vote WILL NOT be counted!


Currently Nominated

Sage

With the work of the Zelda Wiki community, this article has become a well written, and informative page. Quite an accomplishment to everyone who contributed.User:Mandi/sig 04:28, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Support
  1. It seems to me to be rather well organized. And it has a very appealing overall layout. And it certainly fits the other criteria.User:Matt/sig 23:37, March 28, 2009 (UTC)
  2. I would vote for this one because it goes more in depth in Sages than Rauru's page does. --Skermefaten 23:51, 2 April 2009 (UTC)Skermefaten
  3. Very good article, articulate, and an excellent example of what subject directories could be with the links to the main article and well written summaries on each topic. All images are relevant, clear and useful. And a solid mix of references to boot. User:Axiomist/sig 03:14, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
  4. Very organized, and quite easily read. It flows well, and the pictures couldn't be placed onscreen any better or more relevantly. →Kochjr 21:18, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
  5. Well written and organized, it really delves into all of the Sages and it more than qualifies for featured status.--Kresh64 22:04, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
Opposition
Neutral Comments


Twinrova

Matt pointed this one out to me recently, and now that it's complete with full references, I think it definitely meets (or exceeds) all the requirements. A very well put together article about one of my favourite bosses of OOT! User:Adam/sig 18:32, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

Support


Opposition
  1. Well, the article is well written and organized, and has lots of references. It looks interesting enough to be featured.
Neutral Comments

Previously Featured Articles

(Voting Archive) (Failed Nominations)
The featured articles are listed in this format:

  • Name of Article (Date it became featured)

Articles that have been disqualified are in the format:

  • Name of Article (Date it became featured) (Date disqualified)

Here are the featured articles:

  • Zant (October 16, 2007)
  • Link (December 15, 2007)
  • Veran (November 24, 2008)