Zelda Wiki:Failed Nominations/Picture: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Failed Picture Nominations: Mass Sig Updates - Round 3) |
(→Failed Picture Nominations: Mass Sig Updates - Round 4) |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
#Its a bit to fuzzy--[[User:Zanramon@legacy41958083|Zanramon ( ' .' ) look its kirby ['_>']]] 17:42, 2 April 2008 (EDT) | #Its a bit to fuzzy--[[User:Zanramon@legacy41958083|Zanramon ( ' .' ) look its kirby ['_>']]] 17:42, 2 April 2008 (EDT) | ||
#Zanramons right, it's too fuzy. --[[User:Link hero of light@legacy41958106|Link hero of light]] 21:06, 2 April 2008 (EDT) | #Zanramons right, it's too fuzy. --[[User:Link hero of light@legacy41958106|Link hero of light]] 21:06, 2 April 2008 (EDT) | ||
#I also agree. It's incredibly low-resolution as well. --[[User: | #I also agree. It's incredibly low-resolution as well. --[[User:GoldenChaos|Jase]] 07:45, 3 April 2008 (EDT) | ||
#It's too fizy.--[[User:Article and Picture Voter|Article and Picture Voter]] 11:25, 3 April 2008 (EDT) | #It's too fizy.--[[User:Article and Picture Voter|Article and Picture Voter]] 11:25, 3 April 2008 (EDT) | ||
{{clear}} | {{clear}} | ||
Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
#He's my best Brawl character and my favorite Link incarnation--[[User:IceySheegoth|IceySheegoth]]11:24,28 April 2008 (PT) | #He's my best Brawl character and my favorite Link incarnation--[[User:IceySheegoth|IceySheegoth]]11:24,28 April 2008 (PT) | ||
{{Oppose}} | {{Oppose}} | ||
#I really like this picture and think that it should eventually be a featured picture. But Brawl has been out for less than a month and I don't think we should have spoilers of this level on the main page. --[[User:Hisak|Hisak]] 21:24, 3 April 2008 (EDT) | #I really like this picture and think that it should eventually be a featured picture. But Brawl has been out for less than a month and I don't think we should have spoilers of this level on the main page. --[[User:Hisak@legacy41957245|Hisak]] 21:24, 3 April 2008 (EDT) | ||
#I agree with Hisak. At this point of time, this is still spoiler worthy for those few Zelda fans who don't know about it.[[User:Mases554@legacy41957662|Mases]] 16:51, 28 April 2008 (UTC) | #I agree with Hisak. At this point of time, this is still spoiler worthy for those few Zelda fans who don't know about it.[[User:Mases554@legacy41957662|Mases]] 16:51, 28 April 2008 (UTC) | ||
#Truthfully, I don't see the difference between any of the Smash Bros. pictures on this Wiki, besides the character standing in them. They're pretty standard pictures. I also agree with Hisak and Mases. At least feature it later on... --[[User:Yuvorias|Yuvorias]] 12:57, 29 April 2008 (EST) | #Truthfully, I don't see the difference between any of the Smash Bros. pictures on this Wiki, besides the character standing in them. They're pretty standard pictures. I also agree with Hisak and Mases. At least feature it later on... --[[User:Yuvorias@legacy41958105|Yuvorias]] 12:57, 29 April 2008 (EST) | ||
{{clear}} | {{clear}} | ||
}} | }} | ||
Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
{{Support}} | {{Support}} | ||
#i love Zant! He is probably one of the coolest bosses. And Twilight Princess was my first Zelda game. I love his story he tells you. --TwilightKing2 | #i love Zant! He is probably one of the coolest bosses. And Twilight Princess was my first Zelda game. I love his story he tells you. --TwilightKing2 | ||
#As he recently became my favourite boss, I'll give my month's vote to Zant. It is an awesome picture. From the Wii, I notice. --[[User:Yuvorias|Yuvorias]] | #As he recently became my favourite boss, I'll give my month's vote to Zant. It is an awesome picture. From the Wii, I notice. --[[User:Yuvorias@legacy41958105|Yuvorias]] | ||
{{Oppose}} | {{Oppose}} | ||
#The pictures a little too fuzzy --[[User:Seablue254@legacy41958407|David]] <sup>([[User talk:Seablue254@legacy41958407|T]] : [[Special:Contributions/Seablue254@legacy41958407|C]])</sup> 21:12, 14 April 2008 (UTC) | #The pictures a little too fuzzy --[[User:Seablue254@legacy41958407|David]] <sup>([[User talk:Seablue254@legacy41958407|T]] : [[Special:Contributions/Seablue254@legacy41958407|C]])</sup> 21:12, 14 April 2008 (UTC) | ||
Line 65: | Line 65: | ||
| header= [[:File:OoT Link Spin Attack Artwork.jpg|Spinattack.jpg]] — Failed May 8, 2008 | | header= [[:File:OoT Link Spin Attack Artwork.jpg|Spinattack.jpg]] — Failed May 8, 2008 | ||
| content= [[File:OoT Link Spin Attack Artwork.jpg|thumb|right]] | | content= [[File:OoT Link Spin Attack Artwork.jpg|thumb|right]] | ||
One of the more epic Ocarina of Time pictures and one of Link's signiture attacks--[[User:Magnus orion|Magnus orion]] 17:25, 26 March 2008 (EDT) | One of the more epic Ocarina of Time pictures and one of Link's signiture attacks--[[User:Magnus orion@legacy41958278|Magnus orion]] 17:25, 26 March 2008 (EDT) | ||
{{Support}} | {{Support}} | ||
#This is a cool picture, and Deku Babas are so cool.--[[User:Article and Picture Voter|Article and Picture Voter]] 19:44, 1 April 2008 (EDT) | #This is a cool picture, and Deku Babas are so cool.--[[User:Article and Picture Voter|Article and Picture Voter]] 19:44, 1 April 2008 (EDT) | ||
Line 79: | Line 79: | ||
| header= [[:File:ALttP Sacred Grove Artwork.png|Mastersword.jpeg]] — Failed May 10, 2008 | | header= [[:File:ALttP Sacred Grove Artwork.png|Mastersword.jpeg]] — Failed May 10, 2008 | ||
| content= [[File:ALttP Sacred Grove Artwork.png|thumb|200px]] | | content= [[File:ALttP Sacred Grove Artwork.png|thumb|200px]] | ||
This picture of the Master Sword is breathtakingly beautiful, in my opinion. It deserves this status. --[[User:Yuvorias|Mr. Mystery]], 12:13, 9 May 2008 (EST) | This picture of the Master Sword is breathtakingly beautiful, in my opinion. It deserves this status. --[[User:Yuvorias@legacy41958105|Mr. Mystery]], 12:13, 9 May 2008 (EST) | ||
{{Support}} | {{Support}} | ||
Line 98: | Line 98: | ||
{{Oppose}} | {{Oppose}} | ||
#I like the subject matter, and there really ''should'' be a featured pic of the final epic duel between Link and Ganondorf, but when I take a look at the full-sized image, it's just too blurry. When I played the game, I was fairly sure that I could make out more of Ganondorf's facial features than a couple of dots and a curved line for his eyes and mouth. For the time being, it's a no. If you could find a cleaned up version of it, I would certainly vote for it. | #I like the subject matter, and there really ''should'' be a featured pic of the final epic duel between Link and Ganondorf, but when I take a look at the full-sized image, it's just too blurry. When I played the game, I was fairly sure that I could make out more of Ganondorf's facial features than a couple of dots and a curved line for his eyes and mouth. For the time being, it's a no. If you could find a cleaned up version of it, I would certainly vote for it. | ||
#I agree, it's definately more clear on the game. As soon as it's cleared up, it'll have my vote. --[[User:Yuvorias|Mr. Mystery]], 11:17, 11 May 2008 (EST) | #I agree, it's definately more clear on the game. As soon as it's cleared up, it'll have my vote. --[[User:Yuvorias@legacy41958105|Mr. Mystery]], 11:17, 11 May 2008 (EST) | ||
#I don't think it should ever be featured, clear or not.--[[User:Link hero of light@legacy41958106|Link hero of light]] 02:03, 11 May 2008 (UTC) | #I don't think it should ever be featured, clear or not.--[[User:Link hero of light@legacy41958106|Link hero of light]] 02:03, 11 May 2008 (UTC) | ||
{{clear}} | {{clear}} | ||
Line 124: | Line 124: | ||
{{Oppose}} | {{Oppose}} | ||
#I'm going to have to say no on this one. This image is too small. Also, there already is a featured picture with the King of Red Lions in it. In fact, the pose looks almost identical in both. and the other image is much larger.--[[User:Matt1828@legacy41958469|Matt]] 22:05, 12 May 2008 (UTC) | #I'm going to have to say no on this one. This image is too small. Also, there already is a featured picture with the King of Red Lions in it. In fact, the pose looks almost identical in both. and the other image is much larger.--[[User:Matt1828@legacy41958469|Matt]] 22:05, 12 May 2008 (UTC) | ||
#I'm saying no to it as well for all of the above reasons, plus the fact that there seems to be little to the picture itself. Okay, it's the KoRL in a generic pose, so what? A featured picture should capture the essence of the moment, like reuniting Anju and Kafei or link claiming the master sword, etc..--[[User:Rdnckj258|Rdnckj258]] 23:18, 13 May 2008 (UTC) | #I'm saying no to it as well for all of the above reasons, plus the fact that there seems to be little to the picture itself. Okay, it's the KoRL in a generic pose, so what? A featured picture should capture the essence of the moment, like reuniting Anju and Kafei or link claiming the master sword, etc..--[[User:Rdnckj258@legacy41958350|Rdnckj258]] 23:18, 13 May 2008 (UTC) | ||
#Yeah, I find it kind of funny that almost directly below this image is an identical version of it included in [[:File:WW Scene.jpg|another featured picture]] :) --[[User:Adam660@legacy41957735|Adam]] 07:21, 17 May 2008 (UTC) | #Yeah, I find it kind of funny that almost directly below this image is an identical version of it included in [[:File:WW Scene.jpg|another featured picture]] :) --[[User:Adam660@legacy41957735|Adam]] 07:21, 17 May 2008 (UTC) | ||
{{Clear}} | {{Clear}} | ||
Line 137: | Line 137: | ||
#It's official. This picture is so awesome it owns all the haters out there. --[[User:Seablue254@legacy41958407|Seablue254]] 12:21, 3 May 2008 (UTC) | #It's official. This picture is so awesome it owns all the haters out there. --[[User:Seablue254@legacy41958407|Seablue254]] 12:21, 3 May 2008 (UTC) | ||
#Yeah, it took me ''soooooooo'' long to mess about with the wing edges adding transparency - It'd be nice to see this one featured ;) --[[User:Adam660@legacy41957735|Adam]] 21:21, 27 May 2008 (UTC) | #Yeah, it took me ''soooooooo'' long to mess about with the wing edges adding transparency - It'd be nice to see this one featured ;) --[[User:Adam660@legacy41957735|Adam]] 21:21, 27 May 2008 (UTC) | ||
#I'll give it my vote. It is a nice picture. --[[User:Yuvorias|Yuvorias]], 9:52, 30 May 2008 (EST) | #I'll give it my vote. It is a nice picture. --[[User:Yuvorias@legacy41958105|Yuvorias]], 9:52, 30 May 2008 (EST) | ||
#Even before the image was touched up it seemed feature-worthy, so it definitely has my vote now. --[[User:Douken@legacy41958225|Douken]] 19:56, 13 June 2008 (UTC) | #Even before the image was touched up it seemed feature-worthy, so it definitely has my vote now. --[[User:Douken@legacy41958225|Douken]] 19:56, 13 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
#This picture is so detailed, and the beast is at an angle that perfectly reveals all of its best features. ^_^ --[[User:Fairy Boy|Fairy Boy]], 10:06, 20 June 2008 (CST) | #This picture is so detailed, and the beast is at an angle that perfectly reveals all of its best features. ^_^ --[[User:Fairy Boy|Fairy Boy]], 10:06, 20 June 2008 (CST) | ||
Line 183: | Line 183: | ||
| header= [[:File:TP Ganon Render.png|TP Ganon Render.png]] — Failed August 6, 2008 | | header= [[:File:TP Ganon Render.png|TP Ganon Render.png]] — Failed August 6, 2008 | ||
| content= [[File:TP Ganon Render.png|thumb|200px]] | | content= [[File:TP Ganon Render.png|thumb|200px]] | ||
This form of Ganon is really cool and fearsome--[[User:Magnus orion|Magnus orion]] 23:32, 8 May 2008 (UTC) | This form of Ganon is really cool and fearsome--[[User:Magnus orion@legacy41958278|Magnus orion]] 23:32, 8 May 2008 (UTC) | ||
{{Support}} | {{Support}} | ||
# 2 words Ganondorf rules. He is the coolest character in Zelda and Smash Bros. He rules.--[[User:Chaosmaster03|Chaosmaster03]], 11:50 4 June 2008 (EST) | # 2 words Ganondorf rules. He is the coolest character in Zelda and Smash Bros. He rules.--[[User:Chaosmaster03|Chaosmaster03]], 11:50 4 June 2008 (EST) | ||
#I'd like to see this one featured. IMO probably the best Ganon character design to date. {{:User:Adam660@legacy41957735/sig}}15:52, 28 June 2008 (UTC) | #I'd like to see this one featured. IMO probably the best Ganon character design to date. {{:User:Adam660@legacy41957735/sig}}15:52, 28 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
#I'd also like to see this one featured. Fairly large, high quality, and we need at least one featured picture of Ganon.--[[User:Rdnckj258|Rdnckj258]] 14:13, 29 June 2008 (UTC) | #I'd also like to see this one featured. Fairly large, high quality, and we need at least one featured picture of Ganon.--[[User:Rdnckj258@legacy41958350|Rdnckj258]] 14:13, 29 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
#Ganon is amazing. One of the baddest video game villans, if not, THE baddest video game villan ever.--[[User:Zeldagirl93@legacy41958063}Zeldagirl93]] 17:00, 1 July 2008 (EST) | #Ganon is amazing. One of the baddest video game villans, if not, THE baddest video game villan ever.--[[User:Zeldagirl93@legacy41958063}Zeldagirl93]] 17:00, 1 July 2008 (EST) | ||
#This picture is the awesomest! Just gives you the feel of Ganon being one of the baddest villains in Nintendo. You've gotta admit, Ganon is kinda cool!--[[User:Akki|Akki]] 23:54, 8 July 2008 (EST) | #This picture is the awesomest! Just gives you the feel of Ganon being one of the baddest villains in Nintendo. You've gotta admit, Ganon is kinda cool!--[[User:Akki|Akki]] 23:54, 8 July 2008 (EST) | ||
Line 222: | Line 222: | ||
{{Oppose}} | {{Oppose}} | ||
#I'm afraid that I have to oppose this one. We have already Featured both the [[Master Sword]] article, and an [[:File:Ootmastersword.jpeg|image featuring the sword prominently]]. Adding this one would, in my view, put too much emphasis one one subject. I don't think we can really justify featuring an article and picture of the same subject under any circumstance. I would suggest that this image be used to replace the current one shown Template:FA/33|here; that way it can appear on the Main Page without having to be individually featured. {{:User:Adam660@legacy41957735/sig}} 05:24, 19 August 2008 (UTC) | #I'm afraid that I have to oppose this one. We have already Featured both the [[Master Sword]] article, and an [[:File:Ootmastersword.jpeg|image featuring the sword prominently]]. Adding this one would, in my view, put too much emphasis one one subject. I don't think we can really justify featuring an article and picture of the same subject under any circumstance. I would suggest that this image be used to replace the current one shown Template:FA/33|here; that way it can appear on the Main Page without having to be individually featured. {{:User:Adam660@legacy41957735/sig}} 05:24, 19 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
#My sentiments echo Adam's. I should know, I was the one who nominated the Article, as well as another image of the Master Sword that was soundly rejected. And this is far more boring than the one I nominated, in my view. At least the Empty Bottle was original. Also, there's a Link Vs Darknut image which is periodically disqualified from these nominations almost for the same reason as here. If we put this up, wouldn't that be kind of [[Wikipedia:Two_Face|two-faced]]? --[[User:Yuvorias|Felicia's Champion]] 02:31, 21 August 2008 (UTC) | #My sentiments echo Adam's. I should know, I was the one who nominated the Article, as well as another image of the Master Sword that was soundly rejected. And this is far more boring than the one I nominated, in my view. At least the Empty Bottle was original. Also, there's a Link Vs Darknut image which is periodically disqualified from these nominations almost for the same reason as here. If we put this up, wouldn't that be kind of [[Wikipedia:Two_Face|two-faced]]? --[[User:Yuvorias@legacy41958105|Felicia's Champion]] 02:31, 21 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
{{Clear}} | {{Clear}} | ||
}} | }} | ||
Line 229: | Line 229: | ||
| header= [[:File:TWW Empty Bottle Artwork.png|Emptybottle.png]] — Failed August 20, 2008 | | header= [[:File:TWW Empty Bottle Artwork.png|Emptybottle.png]] — Failed August 20, 2008 | ||
| content= [[File:TWW Empty Bottle Artwork.png|thumb|200px]] | | content= [[File:TWW Empty Bottle Artwork.png|thumb|200px]] | ||
Yes, it's simple. That's why I like it. It's also highly representative of the artistic style of The Wind Waker, as well as featuring one of the most sought after and valuable items in the Zelda series. Let's feature something a little unusual! <small>(P.S. Thanks to [[ | Yes, it's simple. That's why I like it. It's also highly representative of the artistic style of The Wind Waker, as well as featuring one of the most sought after and valuable items in the Zelda series. Let's feature something a little unusual! <small>(P.S. Thanks to [[User:Steven|Steven]] for the great render ;)</small> {{:User:Adam660@legacy41957735/sig}} 11:42, 10 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
{{Support}} | {{Support}} | ||
#I have to agree. Wind Waker does have great artwork. I love it. And bottles are a neccesity. I do like Twilight Princess and have never played Phantom Hourglass. But this bottle looks cool.[[User:CoreyPotter|CoreyPotter]] 00:59, 11 August 2008 (UTC)CoreyPotter | #I have to agree. Wind Waker does have great artwork. I love it. And bottles are a neccesity. I do like Twilight Princess and have never played Phantom Hourglass. But this bottle looks cool.[[User:CoreyPotter|CoreyPotter]] 00:59, 11 August 2008 (UTC)CoreyPotter | ||
Line 235: | Line 235: | ||
{{Oppose}} | {{Oppose}} | ||
#While it is a high quality picture, I find that it is too boring to be featured. Other people would laugh when they saw that we featured an empty bottle.--[[User:Article and Picture Voter|Article and Picture Voter]] 20:04, 13 August 2008 (UTC) | #While it is a high quality picture, I find that it is too boring to be featured. Other people would laugh when they saw that we featured an empty bottle.--[[User:Article and Picture Voter|Article and Picture Voter]] 20:04, 13 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
#For the above reasons exactly. It's high quality, large, and representative of WW's style, but it's so simple that it's boring. When I think of a featured picture, I think of something that's interesting and captures the essence of a moment, like a big, scary boss that's screaming its head off. So, for me, it's a no.--[[User:Rdnckj258|Rdnckj258]] 18:00, 15 August 2008 (UTC) | #For the above reasons exactly. It's high quality, large, and representative of WW's style, but it's so simple that it's boring. When I think of a featured picture, I think of something that's interesting and captures the essence of a moment, like a big, scary boss that's screaming its head off. So, for me, it's a no.--[[User:Rdnckj258@legacy41958350|Rdnckj258]] 18:00, 15 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
#It's very high quality. It show's wind waker's cartoon touch, but it's just to boring. --[[User:Link hero of light@legacy41958106|Link hero of light]] 17:12, 20 August 2008 (UTC) | #It's very high quality. It show's wind waker's cartoon touch, but it's just to boring. --[[User:Link hero of light@legacy41958106|Link hero of light]] 17:12, 20 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
{{clear}} | {{clear}} | ||
Line 246: | Line 246: | ||
{{Oppose}} | {{Oppose}} | ||
#Sorry, I have to oppose this again. Like I said last time, I find this picture very plain... --[[User:Yuvorias|Felicia's Champion]] 09:07, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | #Sorry, I have to oppose this again. Like I said last time, I find this picture very plain... --[[User:Yuvorias@legacy41958105|Felicia's Champion]] 09:07, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
#There's already a picture of him in the featured image "Link's Piggy Pals". I don't exactly think we need another one. {{:User:Seablue254@legacy41958407/sig}} 00:50, 27 August 2008 (UTC) | #There's already a picture of him in the featured image "Link's Piggy Pals". I don't exactly think we need another one. {{:User:Seablue254@legacy41958407/sig}} 00:50, 27 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
#Didn't we already feature a picture of Shiek that was almost exactly the same as this? It would just seem repetative.--[[User:CoreyPotter|Corey Lord of Tacos!]] 13:38, 31 August 2008 (UTC) | #Didn't we already feature a picture of Shiek that was almost exactly the same as this? It would just seem repetative.--[[User:CoreyPotter|Corey Lord of Tacos!]] 13:38, 31 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
Line 272: | Line 272: | ||
| header= [[:File:gohma early.jpg|gohma early.jpg]] — October 3, 2008 | | header= [[:File:gohma early.jpg|gohma early.jpg]] — October 3, 2008 | ||
| content= [[File:gohma early.jpg|thumb|right]] | | content= [[File:gohma early.jpg|thumb|right]] | ||
this is a beta version of gohma in tp. i love beta pictures but i never see them get featured. so to add some verity i nominate this awesome gohma beta model. imageine how hard it must be to get this stuff!!!![[User:Dragonstetraforce|Dragonstetraforce]] 21:08, 18 September 2008 (UTC) | this is a beta version of gohma in tp. i love beta pictures but i never see them get featured. so to add some verity i nominate this awesome gohma beta model. imageine how hard it must be to get this stuff!!!![[User:Dragonstetraforce@legacy41959011|Dragonstetraforce]] 21:08, 18 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
{{Support}} | {{Support}} | ||
{{Oppose}} | {{Oppose}} | ||
# As much as it is rare and interesting, it's also small and fairly low resolution.--[[User:Rdnckj258|Rdnckj258]] 18:45, 21 September 2008 (UTC) | # As much as it is rare and interesting, it's also small and fairly low resolution.--[[User:Rdnckj258@legacy41958350|Rdnckj258]] 18:45, 21 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
#It's a little blurry too. There are several shots of "Beta TP" like this, so it would seem odd to just feature one anyway. --[[User:Douken@legacy41958225|Douken]] 20:33, 21 September 2008 (UTC) | #It's a little blurry too. There are several shots of "Beta TP" like this, so it would seem odd to just feature one anyway. --[[User:Douken@legacy41958225|Douken]] 20:33, 21 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
#Yes, it is interesting. But look at our previous featured images. Now look at this one. There is no comparison. The quality of this is image is far too poor to ever be featured. The quality is so bad, that I highly doubt that either [[User:Steven|Steven]] or myself could improve the quality of this image to acceptable levels. This image also was not given a source.{{:User:Matt1828@legacy41958469/sig|~}} <span style="color:#C0C0C0;">00:55, October 3, 2008 (UTC)</span> | #Yes, it is interesting. But look at our previous featured images. Now look at this one. There is no comparison. The quality of this is image is far too poor to ever be featured. The quality is so bad, that I highly doubt that either [[User:Steven|Steven]] or myself could improve the quality of this image to acceptable levels. This image also was not given a source.{{:User:Matt1828@legacy41958469/sig|~}} <span style="color:#C0C0C0;">00:55, October 3, 2008 (UTC)</span> | ||
Line 289: | Line 289: | ||
::This nomination is an experiment in a new policy. It is intended as a replacement for the existing image [[:File:Deathhh.jpg|Deathhh.jpg]]. If this image is voted in, the old one will automatically be disqualified and the new one will replace it on every single page that the old one was on, save for this one. | ::This nomination is an experiment in a new policy. It is intended as a replacement for the existing image [[:File:Deathhh.jpg|Deathhh.jpg]]. If this image is voted in, the old one will automatically be disqualified and the new one will replace it on every single page that the old one was on, save for this one. | ||
'''ALSO NOTE:'''<br> | '''ALSO NOTE:'''<br/> | ||
The subject of this image is black. The old background is black. This image has '''NO BACKGROUND!!!!!!!'''. It is transparent. The page background is normal blue. So in no way is this harder to see than the old one. It is a physical impossibility. The contrast is greater for the new one. The ease of seeing it is due to contrast.<br> | The subject of this image is black. The old background is black. This image has '''NO BACKGROUND!!!!!!!'''. It is transparent. The page background is normal blue. So in no way is this harder to see than the old one. It is a physical impossibility. The contrast is greater for the new one. The ease of seeing it is due to contrast.<br/> | ||
To clarify this, go [http://zeldawiki.org/images/3/3d/TP Death Sword Render.png here]. | To clarify this, go [http://zeldawiki.org/images/3/3d/TP Death Sword Render.png here]. | ||
Line 297: | Line 297: | ||
{{Oppose}} | {{Oppose}} | ||
#You can't see it as good without the background.--[[User:Article and Picture Voter|Article and Picture Voter]] 01:19, 6 October 2008 (UTC) | #You can't see it as good without the background.--[[User:Article and Picture Voter|Article and Picture Voter]] 01:19, 6 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
#The background on the old picture was half the reason I liked the old picture. With this one, half the reason I liked it is gone. That's why my vote is here, and not in "support". --[[User:Yuvorias|Felicia's Champion]] 09:24, 6 October 2008 (UTC) | #The background on the old picture was half the reason I liked the old picture. With this one, half the reason I liked it is gone. That's why my vote is here, and not in "support". --[[User:Yuvorias@legacy41958105|Felicia's Champion]] 09:24, 6 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
#a trasparent charater on no background is inpossible to see.[[User:Dragonstetraforce|Dragonstetraforce]] 20:37, 8 October 2008 (UTC) | #a trasparent charater on no background is inpossible to see.[[User:Dragonstetraforce@legacy41959011|Dragonstetraforce]] 20:37, 8 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
#It just isn't the same without the background. Also, it is very hard to see and a featured picture should be easy to see.--[[User:Link hero of light@legacy41958106|Link hero of light]] 18:54, 12 October 2008 (UTC) | #It just isn't the same without the background. Also, it is very hard to see and a featured picture should be easy to see.--[[User:Link hero of light@legacy41958106|Link hero of light]] 18:54, 12 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
#I have to say, regardless of issues such as clarity or contrast, my problem with the new image is the lack of background. Yes, it was fairly plain, but it wasn't just black. See the purple bit? That cleverly adds both interest and atmosphere to an otherwise slightly plain image. As a (slightly exaggerated) analogy, imagine a film such as The Matrix, shot almost entirely against green-screen. Should they have released that film with just the actors jumping around in front of a green backdrop, instead of adding the CG environments? {{:User:Adam660@legacy41957735/sig}} 05:59, 16 October 2008 (UTC) | #I have to say, regardless of issues such as clarity or contrast, my problem with the new image is the lack of background. Yes, it was fairly plain, but it wasn't just black. See the purple bit? That cleverly adds both interest and atmosphere to an otherwise slightly plain image. As a (slightly exaggerated) analogy, imagine a film such as The Matrix, shot almost entirely against green-screen. Should they have released that film with just the actors jumping around in front of a green backdrop, instead of adding the CG environments? {{:User:Adam660@legacy41957735/sig}} 05:59, 16 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
Line 311: | Line 311: | ||
{{Support}} | {{Support}} | ||
#A very interesting nomination! I have to agree, I would like to see this featured. Thus far, we have no pictures depicting Deku Scrubs primarially, and the only picture that does feature one is Deku Link, hiding in the background for the MM picture. So, first vote! --[[User:Yuvorias|Felicia's Champion]] 23:57, 6 September 2008 (UTC) | #A very interesting nomination! I have to agree, I would like to see this featured. Thus far, we have no pictures depicting Deku Scrubs primarially, and the only picture that does feature one is Deku Link, hiding in the background for the MM picture. So, first vote! --[[User:Yuvorias@legacy41958105|Felicia's Champion]] 23:57, 6 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
#Great nomination! I've always liked these characters and this image, and with a some work by Steven and myself, it's now of the best quality possible! {{:User:Adam660@legacy41957735/sig}} 11:30, 21 September 2008 (UTC) | #Great nomination! I've always liked these characters and this image, and with a some work by Steven and myself, it's now of the best quality possible! {{:User:Adam660@legacy41957735/sig}} 11:30, 21 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
#I've always loved this image. It's about time it got nominated. {{:User:Twili_Goddess/sig}} | #I've always loved this image. It's about time it got nominated. {{:User:Twili_Goddess/sig}} | ||
Line 321: | Line 321: | ||
#I don't really see what is so impressive about this image. It is rather bland and not particularly interesting. It doesn't really stand out among the vast number of images on this site. It is no more interesting than most others. Too simple to be featured.{{:User:Matt1828@legacy41958469/sig|~}} <span style="color:#C0C0C0;">03:17, September 27, 2008 (UTC)</span> | #I don't really see what is so impressive about this image. It is rather bland and not particularly interesting. It doesn't really stand out among the vast number of images on this site. It is no more interesting than most others. Too simple to be featured.{{:User:Matt1828@legacy41958469/sig|~}} <span style="color:#C0C0C0;">03:17, September 27, 2008 (UTC)</span> | ||
#This picture does show anything particuarly interesting. It does not show you you something important. The image leaves something to be desired, and is also simple to the point where the larger portion of the pictures on this web address are more interesting. the flaws are too great for it to be featured.[[User:Kingbulbin|Kingbulbin]] 11:41, 30 September 2008 (UTC) | #This picture does show anything particuarly interesting. It does not show you you something important. The image leaves something to be desired, and is also simple to the point where the larger portion of the pictures on this web address are more interesting. the flaws are too great for it to be featured.[[User:Kingbulbin|Kingbulbin]] 11:41, 30 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
#I find this picture to be very bland. Its color is not good. It shouldnt be featured--[[User: | #I find this picture to be very bland. Its color is not good. It shouldnt be featured--[[User:Lt. Hammerspace@legacy41959211|HeroOfTime6]] 13:28, 11 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
{{clear}} | {{clear}} | ||
Line 338: | Line 338: | ||
{{Oppose}} | {{Oppose}} | ||
#I oppose this because when i look at it i can't make out what it is, its just not interesting.[[User: | #I oppose this because when i look at it i can't make out what it is, its just not interesting.[[User:Lt. Hammerspace@legacy41959211|HeroOfTime6]] 10:05, 1 November 2008 | ||
#<s>I had to click on the picture to see what it actually was. I thought the lantern was Navi. My interest is also not sparked. --[[User:HeroOfTheWinds10|HeroOfTheWinds10]] 19:50, 7 November 2008 (UTC)</s> | #<s>I had to click on the picture to see what it actually was. I thought the lantern was Navi. My interest is also not sparked. --[[User:HeroOfTheWinds10@legacy41959235|HeroOfTheWinds10]] 19:50, 7 November 2008 (UTC)</s> | ||
#*Vote nullified by a consensus of three. | #*Vote nullified by a consensus of three. | ||
#<s>This picture would have been cooler in monochrome, also this picture doesn't have Link's face and his face is pretty.--[[User:ILoVeSaSuSkE|ILoVeSaSuSkE]] 19:30, 10 November 2008 (UTC)</s> | #<s>This picture would have been cooler in monochrome, also this picture doesn't have Link's face and his face is pretty.--[[User:ILoVeSaSuSkE|ILoVeSaSuSkE]] 19:30, 10 November 2008 (UTC)</s> | ||
Line 365: | Line 365: | ||
*Did you call Ando or E-mail him? I figured you must have some means of comunnication with him since you knew he was going to be gone.--[[User:Link hero of light@legacy41958106|Link hero of light]] 04:09, 8 November 2008 (UTC) | *Did you call Ando or E-mail him? I figured you must have some means of comunnication with him since you knew he was going to be gone.--[[User:Link hero of light@legacy41958106|Link hero of light]] 04:09, 8 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
**One, [[User:Ando1400@legacy41958204#Contact Info|check this, LHOL]]. Two, if they find the image uninteresting, well, that's their opinion, and given that featured picture nominees are decided almost solely on personal preference of the image, that's okay. However, saying "I can't make out what this is unless I look at it in full view" isn't right: you're voting on the image, not on the thumbnail. If you don't like the full image, that's fine! You're entitled to that opinion. But stating that you don't like the thumbnail is not a valid reason to oppose the image's nomination. {{:User:Ando1400@legacy41958204/sig}} 04:45, 8 November 2008 (UTC) | **One, [[User:Ando1400@legacy41958204#Contact Info|check this, LHOL]]. Two, if they find the image uninteresting, well, that's their opinion, and given that featured picture nominees are decided almost solely on personal preference of the image, that's okay. However, saying "I can't make out what this is unless I look at it in full view" isn't right: you're voting on the image, not on the thumbnail. If you don't like the full image, that's fine! You're entitled to that opinion. But stating that you don't like the thumbnail is not a valid reason to oppose the image's nomination. {{:User:Ando1400@legacy41958204/sig}} 04:45, 8 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
*Okay. I know that it was a beginner's mistake to complain about the thumbnail. But I did also mention that I was not very interested in the picture.--[[User:HeroOfTheWinds10|HeroOfTheWinds10]] 21:37, 9 November 2008 (UTC) | *Okay. I know that it was a beginner's mistake to complain about the thumbnail. But I did also mention that I was not very interested in the picture.--[[User:HeroOfTheWinds10@legacy41959235|HeroOfTheWinds10]] 21:37, 9 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
**Noted, but we have had a consensus of three. The vote is out. Sorry. The point is that you've learned from your mistake.{{:User:Matt1828@legacy41958469/sig|~}} <span style="color:#C0C0C0;">21:34, November 14, 2008 (UTC)</span> | **Noted, but we have had a consensus of three. The vote is out. Sorry. The point is that you've learned from your mistake.{{:User:Matt1828@legacy41958469/sig|~}} <span style="color:#C0C0C0;">21:34, November 14, 2008 (UTC)</span> | ||
*I said i couldnt make out what it was because its so swirly and not interesting but lets put all this uglyness behind us.--[[User: | *I said i couldnt make out what it was because its so swirly and not interesting but lets put all this uglyness behind us.--[[User:Lt. Hammerspace@legacy41959211|HeroOfTime6]] 21:59, 9 November 2008 (UTC)about to be capsized! That is too interesting by anyone's standards.{{:User:Matt1828@legacy41958469/sig|~}} | ||
**Swirly? He's caught it a wave. The part behind the sail is sky. Not innteresting? He is <span style="color:#C0C0C0;">21:34, November 14, 2008 (UTC)</span> | **Swirly? He's caught it a wave. The part behind the sail is sky. Not innteresting? He is <span style="color:#C0C0C0;">21:34, November 14, 2008 (UTC)</span> | ||
*Well not my standards it makes me seasick HAHAHA, oh well I don't know what else to say. And that monocrome thing is just that guy being a NOOb.--[[User: | *Well not my standards it makes me seasick HAHAHA, oh well I don't know what else to say. And that monocrome thing is just that guy being a NOOb.--[[User:Lt. Hammerspace@legacy41959211|HeroOfTime6]] 22:19, 14 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
**So what does your seasickness have to do with the quality of this image?{{:User:Matt1828@legacy41958469/sig|~}} <span style="color:#C0C0C0;">22:52, November 14, 2008 (UTC)</span> | **So what does your seasickness have to do with the quality of this image?{{:User:Matt1828@legacy41958469/sig|~}} <span style="color:#C0C0C0;">22:52, November 14, 2008 (UTC)</span> | ||
*Oh...I was just kidding. But in all seriousness i just don't care for the image.--[[User: | *Oh...I was just kidding. But in all seriousness i just don't care for the image.--[[User:Lt. Hammerspace@legacy41959211|HeroOfTime6]] 01:54, 15 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
}} | }} | ||
---- | ---- | ||
*Can we really count the third vote? Monocrome? No one would ever let a monocrome one be featured. Besides the original version from the book wasn't monocrome. Also, not showing Link's face because his face is pretty? I didn't draw this! We'd never let fan art be featured. This isn't a matter of whether Link's face is pretty or not! I think that this vote should be nullified too.{{:User:Matt1828@legacy41958469/sig|~}} <span style="color:#C0C0C0;">21:34, November 14, 2008 (UTC)</span> | *Can we really count the third vote? Monocrome? No one would ever let a monocrome one be featured. Besides the original version from the book wasn't monocrome. Also, not showing Link's face because his face is pretty? I didn't draw this! We'd never let fan art be featured. This isn't a matter of whether Link's face is pretty or not! I think that this vote should be nullified too.{{:User:Matt1828@legacy41958469/sig|~}} <span style="color:#C0C0C0;">21:34, November 14, 2008 (UTC)</span> | ||
*Get rid of that Links face is pretty vote thats just crazy, it makes us look unprofessional.--[[User: | *Get rid of that Links face is pretty vote thats just crazy, it makes us look unprofessional.--[[User:Lt. Hammerspace@legacy41959211|HeroOfTime6]] 22:23, 14 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
---- | ---- | ||
Line 401: | Line 401: | ||
And so will I. One thing I want to ask you is can you show me what the oringinal picture looked like?--[[User:Link hero of light@legacy41958106|Link hero of light]] 00:48, 17 November 2008 (UTC) | And so will I. One thing I want to ask you is can you show me what the oringinal picture looked like?--[[User:Link hero of light@legacy41958106|Link hero of light]] 00:48, 17 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
These votes are opinions of why people think pictures should or should not be featured. If your own opinion conflicts with the opinion of someone else... does that mean they're wrong? If someone feels strongly enough about a reason to deny an image to be featured they should at least be given a chance to have their votes counted. It isn't like people are trying to hurt the website by voting against an image. They are just trying to help it by giving a certain reason why they think it shouldn't be featured. (I understand that my vote was with '''good reason''' denied)--[[User:HeroOfTheWinds10|HeroOfTheWinds10]] 04:27, 17 November 2008 (UTC) | These votes are opinions of why people think pictures should or should not be featured. If your own opinion conflicts with the opinion of someone else... does that mean they're wrong? If someone feels strongly enough about a reason to deny an image to be featured they should at least be given a chance to have their votes counted. It isn't like people are trying to hurt the website by voting against an image. They are just trying to help it by giving a certain reason why they think it shouldn't be featured. (I understand that my vote was with '''good reason''' denied)--[[User:HeroOfTheWinds10@legacy41959235|HeroOfTheWinds10]] 04:27, 17 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
:That is what the guidelines will be for. Right now it is basically hit-or-miss. So it'll be messy until then. Once they're up, things will be much better for everyone. And it will making voting easier too.{{:User:Matt1828@legacy41958469/sig|~}} <span style="color:#C0C0C0;">04:38, November 17, 2008 (UTC)</span> | :That is what the guidelines will be for. Right now it is basically hit-or-miss. So it'll be messy until then. Once they're up, things will be much better for everyone. And it will making voting easier too.{{:User:Matt1828@legacy41958469/sig|~}} <span style="color:#C0C0C0;">04:38, November 17, 2008 (UTC)</span> | ||
Line 409: | Line 409: | ||
| header= [[:File:PH Scene 1-2.png|PH Scene 1-2.png]]/[[:File:Ph scene 1b.jpg|Ph scene 1b.jpg]] — Failed on November 18, 2008 | | header= [[:File:PH Scene 1-2.png|PH Scene 1-2.png]]/[[:File:Ph scene 1b.jpg|Ph scene 1b.jpg]] — Failed on November 18, 2008 | ||
| content= | | content= | ||
I think we definitely need a featured image from the most recent game in the series, and I really like this one. Having said that, I couldn't decide which version to choose, so I've decided to leave the decision up to you! When voting in support, please start votes with '''A:''' or '''B:''' to indicate your preference. {{:User:Adam660@legacy41957735/sig}} 18:09, 7 August 2008 (UTC)< | I think we definitely need a featured image from the most recent game in the series, and I really like this one. Having said that, I couldn't decide which version to choose, so I've decided to leave the decision up to you! When voting in support, please start votes with '''A:''' or '''B:''' to indicate your preference. {{:User:Adam660@legacy41957735/sig}} 18:09, 7 August 2008 (UTC)<br/><br/><br/><br/><br/><br/> | ||
[[File:PH Scene 1-2.png|thumb|right|200px|<center><b>Option A</b></center>]] | [[File:PH Scene 1-2.png|thumb|right|200px|<center><b>Option A</b></center>]] | ||
[[File:Ph scene 1b.jpg|thumb|right|200px|<center><b>Option B</b></center>]] | [[File:Ph scene 1b.jpg|thumb|right|200px|<center><b>Option B</b></center>]] | ||
Line 423: | Line 423: | ||
{{Oppose}} | {{Oppose}} | ||
# I don't like either one. '''A''' is too zoomed in, and '''B''' has a logo. There needs to be a different Phantom Hourglass picture featured.--[[User: | # I don't like either one. '''A''' is too zoomed in, and '''B''' has a logo. There needs to be a different Phantom Hourglass picture featured.--[[User:Lt. Hammerspace@legacy41959211|HeroOfTime6]] 19:47, 17 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
# Actually... yeah, I agree with HeroOfTime on this. --[[User:Douken@legacy41958225|Douken]] 22:05, 17 November 2008 (UTC) | # Actually... yeah, I agree with HeroOfTime on this. --[[User:Douken@legacy41958225|Douken]] 22:05, 17 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
{{clear}} | {{clear}} | ||
Line 449: | Line 449: | ||
This is an amazing, beautiful, wonderful, awesome picture. This is one of Steve's best picture I've ever seen. I have no idea how he managed to get this picture! This is a rare shot!--[[User:Link hero of light@legacy41958106|Link hero of light]] 01:11, 19 December 2008 (UTC) | This is an amazing, beautiful, wonderful, awesome picture. This is one of Steve's best picture I've ever seen. I have no idea how he managed to get this picture! This is a rare shot!--[[User:Link hero of light@legacy41958106|Link hero of light]] 01:11, 19 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
{{Support}} | {{Support}} | ||
#Wow I've never seen this picture before, only on the game.--[[User:Lt. Hammerspace|Lt. Hammerspace]] 03:37, 19 December 2008 (UTC) | #Wow I've never seen this picture before, only on the game.--[[User:Lt. Hammerspace@legacy41959211|Lt. Hammerspace]] 03:37, 19 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
# I dont know why but I love this sword.It just looks so crazy how each part of the sword is different,and the eye on the hilt is cool aswell. It may be a bit on the small side but its still big enough and the quality of the image is very good. --[[User:Kresh64|Kresh64]] 18:01, 19 December 2008 (UTC) | # I dont know why but I love this sword.It just looks so crazy how each part of the sword is different,and the eye on the hilt is cool aswell. It may be a bit on the small side but its still big enough and the quality of the image is very good. --[[User:Kresh64|Kresh64]] 18:01, 19 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
#Hallelulja-moment! --[[User:Olle93|Olle93]] 17:01, 28 December 2008 (UTC) | #Hallelulja-moment! --[[User:Olle93|Olle93]] 17:01, 28 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
Line 455: | Line 455: | ||
{{Oppose}} | {{Oppose}} | ||
#I dunno, it's kind of small. Also, we already have a featured sword image that's quite a bit larger.--[[User:Rdnckj258|Rdnckj258]] 16:33, 19 December 2008 (UTC) | #I dunno, it's kind of small. Also, we already have a featured sword image that's quite a bit larger.--[[User:Rdnckj258@legacy41958350|Rdnckj258]] 16:33, 19 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
#Mmmm... it's a bit small, and there are several sword images that appear to be more interesting and of higher quality. I understand that there isn't much that can be done with it but... {{:User:Alter/sig}} 19:43, 2 February 2009 (UTC) | #Mmmm... it's a bit small, and there are several sword images that appear to be more interesting and of higher quality. I understand that there isn't much that can be done with it but... {{:User:Alter/sig}} 19:43, 2 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
#It is a good picture. But it's rather on the small side. And not really an important thing.[[User:CoreyPotter|Corey Lord of Tacos!]] 18:09, 21 February 2009 (UTC) | #It is a good picture. But it's rather on the small side. And not really an important thing.[[User:CoreyPotter|Corey Lord of Tacos!]] 18:09, 21 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
Line 472: | Line 472: | ||
{{Oppose}} | {{Oppose}} | ||
#The Picture in question is not suitable to be featured, if Tingle does get a featured picture it should have a better style and be more interesting.--[[User:Gillispie|Gillispie]] 01:33, 18 January 2009 (UTC) | #The Picture in question is not suitable to be featured, if Tingle does get a featured picture it should have a better style and be more interesting.--[[User:Gillispie|Gillispie]] 01:33, 18 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
#<s>Wow this picture is stupid. Im sure you guys could find a better tingle image.--[[User:Lt. Hammerspace|Lt. Hammerspace]] 21:05, 19 | #<s>Wow this picture is stupid. Im sure you guys could find a better tingle image.--[[User:Lt. Hammerspace@legacy41959211|Lt. Hammerspace]] 21:05, 19 | ||
February 2009 (UTC) </s> | February 2009 (UTC) </s> | ||
:*Above vote negated per opposition guidelines at the top of the page. {{:User:Adam660@legacy41957735/sig}} 08:28, 22 February 2009 (UTC) | :*Above vote negated per opposition guidelines at the top of the page. {{:User:Adam660@legacy41957735/sig}} 08:28, 22 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
Line 480: | Line 480: | ||
*Well, if we should have featured picture of Tingle, I personally would like a art work from wind wake more because I like that style better, but that´s just me...--[[User:Olle93|Olle93]] 19:10, 13 January 2009 (UTC) | *Well, if we should have featured picture of Tingle, I personally would like a art work from wind wake more because I like that style better, but that´s just me...--[[User:Olle93|Olle93]] 19:10, 13 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
*I'd like to see a featured picture of Tingle, but if I had the choice it wouldn't be this one. It's not the most interesting picture of Tingle nor is it the highest quality one. In my opinion there are better pictures of Tingle which would be more deserving of a feautured picture, not least the picture of Tingle taken from the game's box art. -- [[User: Tingle :)]] | *I'd like to see a featured picture of Tingle, but if I had the choice it wouldn't be this one. It's not the most interesting picture of Tingle nor is it the highest quality one. In my opinion there are better pictures of Tingle which would be more deserving of a feautured picture, not least the picture of Tingle taken from the game's box art. -- [[User: Tingle :)]] | ||
*So, Adam you don't think this picture is stupid...I mean come on its horrible. At least find a more classic picture.--[[User:Lt. Hammerspace|Lt. Hammerspace]] 02:01, 11 March 2009 (UTC) | *So, Adam you don't think this picture is stupid...I mean come on its horrible. At least find a more classic picture.--[[User:Lt. Hammerspace@legacy41959211|Lt. Hammerspace]] 02:01, 11 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
**That may be. But an invalid vote is still an invalid vote. There was nothing personal about it. it had nothing to do with what Adam thought of the image. The guidelines are clearly defined above and your vote is in violation of those guidelines.{{:User:Matt1828@legacy41958469/sig|~}} 02:16, March 11, 2009 (UTC) | **That may be. But an invalid vote is still an invalid vote. There was nothing personal about it. it had nothing to do with what Adam thought of the image. The guidelines are clearly defined above and your vote is in violation of those guidelines.{{:User:Matt1828@legacy41958469/sig|~}} 02:16, March 11, 2009 (UTC) | ||
{{Clear}} | {{Clear}} | ||
Line 487: | Line 487: | ||
{{hide|header=[[:File:MM Twinmold Artwork.png|MM Twinmold Artwork.png]] — Failed on April 14, 2009|content= | {{hide|header=[[:File:MM Twinmold Artwork.png|MM Twinmold Artwork.png]] — Failed on April 14, 2009|content= | ||
[[File:MM Twinmold Artwork.png|300px|frameless|right]] | [[File:MM Twinmold Artwork.png|300px|frameless|right]] | ||
I was looking at the bosses of Zelda the other day, and this image caught my eye above a lot of other images. It's a really good image done (edited) by Markol, and one of few MM pictures I've seen which are truly awesome. --[[User:Yuvorias|Felicia's Champion]] 05:42, 18 November 2008 (UTC) | I was looking at the bosses of Zelda the other day, and this image caught my eye above a lot of other images. It's a really good image done (edited) by Markol, and one of few MM pictures I've seen which are truly awesome. --[[User:Yuvorias@legacy41958105|Felicia's Champion]] 05:42, 18 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
{{Support}} | {{Support}} | ||
Line 507: | Line 507: | ||
I don't like it either way, but I prefer the it with shadows.--[[User:Link hero of light@legacy41958106|Link hero of light]] 06:56, 4 January 2009 (UTC) | I don't like it either way, but I prefer the it with shadows.--[[User:Link hero of light@legacy41958106|Link hero of light]] 06:56, 4 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
The shadow style is just a part of Majora's Mask art style. Nothing wrong with that. Although I don't really like Twinmold, and the image is kinda small I think. [[User: | The shadow style is just a part of Majora's Mask art style. Nothing wrong with that. Although I don't really like Twinmold, and the image is kinda small I think. [[User:Midoro|The Goron Moron]] 07:04, 4 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
:If it didn't have the shadows, it wouldn't be Majora's Mask ;)--{{:User:Mandi2517@legacy41958928/sig}} 07:06, 4 January 2009 (UTC) | :If it didn't have the shadows, it wouldn't be Majora's Mask ;)--{{:User:Mandi2517@legacy41958928/sig}} 07:06, 4 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
::...I haven't checked this out since I nominated it. It's much...brighter than I remember it. I preferred the previous darker version, and so am very tempted to oppose my own nomination. But, there's probably something in the rules against that. So I won't. --[[User:Yuvorias|Felicia's Champion]] 06:37, 13 April 2009 (UTC) | ::...I haven't checked this out since I nominated it. It's much...brighter than I remember it. I preferred the previous darker version, and so am very tempted to oppose my own nomination. But, there's probably something in the rules against that. So I won't. --[[User:Yuvorias@legacy41958105|Felicia's Champion]] 06:37, 13 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{hide|header=[[:File:PhantomHourglassscene13.png|PhantomHourglassscene13.png]] (Bellumbeck) — Failed on April 18, 2009 | {{hide|header=[[:File:PhantomHourglassscene13.png|PhantomHourglassscene13.png]] (Bellumbeck) — Failed on April 18, 2009 | ||
Line 539: | Line 539: | ||
{{hide|header=[[:File:OoT Link Riding Epona Artwork.png|Epona w link.png]] (Link with Epona) — Failed on October 1, 2009|content= | {{hide|header=[[:File:OoT Link Riding Epona Artwork.png|Epona w link.png]] (Link with Epona) — Failed on October 1, 2009|content= | ||
[[File:OoT Link Riding Epona Artwork.png|thumb|right]] | [[File:OoT Link Riding Epona Artwork.png|thumb|right]] | ||
This is a very cool image that needs to be featured. There are not very many Epona pictures but I think this one is the best. It really captures the image of Ocarina of Time. It is very nicely drawn and old school. It needs to be featured.--[[User:Lt. Hammerspace|Lt. Hammerspace]] 03:30, 29 September 2009 (UTC) | This is a very cool image that needs to be featured. There are not very many Epona pictures but I think this one is the best. It really captures the image of Ocarina of Time. It is very nicely drawn and old school. It needs to be featured.--[[User:Lt. Hammerspace@legacy41959211|Lt. Hammerspace]] 03:30, 29 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
{{Support}} | {{Support}} | ||
Line 653: | Line 653: | ||
{{Oppose}} | {{Oppose}} | ||
#The quality here is horrible, and really, who wants to have the '''back''' of something as featured?<span style="color:#3FA9D0;">—★</span>[[User:Chip200|<span style="color:yellow;">Chip</span>]][[User | #The quality here is horrible, and really, who wants to have the '''back''' of something as featured?<span style="color:#3FA9D0;">—★</span>[[User:Chip200|<span style="color:yellow;">Chip</span>]][[User talk:Chip200|<span style="color:orange;"><sup>200</sup></span>]] 14:57, 11 May 2011 (EDT) | ||
#This image looks spectacular in its thumbnail version, however upon viewing full size... not so much. Not only does the resolution seem to be low, but the transparency is choppy and not to mention the black lines are rather obnoxious looking. It's a beautiful image, just not feature quality. {{:User:Mandi2517@legacy41958928/sig}} 23:04, June 30, 2011 (UTC) | #This image looks spectacular in its thumbnail version, however upon viewing full size... not so much. Not only does the resolution seem to be low, but the transparency is choppy and not to mention the black lines are rather obnoxious looking. It's a beautiful image, just not feature quality. {{:User:Mandi2517@legacy41958928/sig}} 23:04, June 30, 2011 (UTC) | ||
#Yeah, it's interesting in terms of something to have in the article, but the image doesn't stand on its own merits. The black lines look weird, and the pixels are all quite visible. Also, it's a circular object, but this image isn't even round; it's a regular [[wikipedia:icosagon|icosagon]]! (yes, I had to look the name up) {{:User:Adam660@legacy41957735/sig}} 16:01, 10 July 2011 (EDT) | #Yeah, it's interesting in terms of something to have in the article, but the image doesn't stand on its own merits. The black lines look weird, and the pixels are all quite visible. Also, it's a circular object, but this image isn't even round; it's a regular [[wikipedia:icosagon|icosagon]]! (yes, I had to look the name up) {{:User:Adam660@legacy41957735/sig}} 16:01, 10 July 2011 (EDT) | ||
Line 707: | Line 707: | ||
# This is image is supported by me because i think the Mirror Of Twilight is a very cool item also if you look at this picture it gives off kind of a rotating illusion.[[User:Sammoldy|Sammoldy]] 04:20, 3 November 2011 (EDT) | # This is image is supported by me because i think the Mirror Of Twilight is a very cool item also if you look at this picture it gives off kind of a rotating illusion.[[User:Sammoldy|Sammoldy]] 04:20, 3 November 2011 (EDT) | ||
# This is a very beautiful image, and it is not blurry or dark. Also, the main focus of the picture is the mirror, because there is no background to get in the way. --12:36, 23 October 2011 (EDT)[[User: | # This is a very beautiful image, and it is not blurry or dark. Also, the main focus of the picture is the mirror, because there is no background to get in the way. --12:36, 23 October 2011 (EDT)[[User:Planetbox@legacy41964341|Person777]] 12:36, 23 October 2011 (EDT) | ||
{{Oppose}} | {{Oppose}} | ||
#While it looks OK in thumbnail view, I have to say I don't think the image quality is good enough to feature it. There's that weird black line around the inner edge. And the fact that it's angular instead of circular... Also, as a unique magical object, to me it's much more epic when it's actually doing it's thing than just sitting there as a flat surface. EDIT: Plus, [[:File:Mirror_of_Twilight.gif|this version]] is significantly better! {{:User:Adam660@legacy41957735/sig}} 02:27, 28 February 2012 (EST) | #While it looks OK in thumbnail view, I have to say I don't think the image quality is good enough to feature it. There's that weird black line around the inner edge. And the fact that it's angular instead of circular... Also, as a unique magical object, to me it's much more epic when it's actually doing it's thing than just sitting there as a flat surface. EDIT: Plus, [[:File:Mirror_of_Twilight.gif|this version]] is significantly better! {{:User:Adam660@legacy41957735/sig}} 02:27, 28 February 2012 (EST) | ||
Line 876: | Line 876: | ||
{{Support}} | {{Support}} | ||
#I personally think this shows the contrast of the two world well. --[[User:Planetbox|Planetbox]] ([[User talk:Planetbox|talk]]) 17:45, 27 October 2013 (UTC) | #I personally think this shows the contrast of the two world well. --[[User:Planetbox@legacy41964341|Planetbox]] ([[User talk:Planetbox@legacy41964341|talk]]) 17:45, 27 October 2013 (UTC) | ||
#It's definitely the art piece I think will stand out from the rest for this game, very visually pleasing. - [[User:Bwar1133@legacy41958018|Bwar]] ([[User talk:Bwar1133@legacy41958018|talk]]) 16:00, 12 November 2013 (UTC) | #It's definitely the art piece I think will stand out from the rest for this game, very visually pleasing. - [[User:Bwar1133@legacy41958018|Bwar]] ([[User talk:Bwar1133@legacy41958018|talk]]) 16:00, 12 November 2013 (UTC) | ||
#This artwork is not only a spectacular, high quality piece of art, but is also representative of the game's major themes and is therefore feature worthy in my opinion. {{:User:HelmarokKing/sig}} 03:00, 19 December 2013 (UTC) | #This artwork is not only a spectacular, high quality piece of art, but is also representative of the game's major themes and is therefore feature worthy in my opinion. {{:User:HelmarokKing/sig}} 03:00, 19 December 2013 (UTC) | ||
# I believe that this piece of artwork shows how Lorule is just a flip of how Hyrule is built up. --[[User:Infernap|Infernap]] ([[User talk:Infernap|talk]]) 13:28, 19 December 2013 (UTC) | # I believe that this piece of artwork shows how Lorule is just a flip of how Hyrule is built up. --[[User:Infernap|Infernap]] ([[User talk:Infernap|talk]]) 13:28, 19 December 2013 (UTC) | ||
# Beautiful artwork, emphasizing the dichotomy between Hyrule and Lorule. The color choices are excellent, too - the vibrant greens of Hyrule contrast well with the stagnant, dark purples and yellows of Lorule. [[User:Wwtoonlinkfan|wwtoonlinkfan]] ([[User talk:Wwtoonlinkfan|talk]]) 11:09, 12 January 2014 (UTC) | # Beautiful artwork, emphasizing the dichotomy between Hyrule and Lorule. The color choices are excellent, too - the vibrant greens of Hyrule contrast well with the stagnant, dark purples and yellows of Lorule. [[User:Wwtoonlinkfan|wwtoonlinkfan]] ([[User talk:Wwtoonlinkfan|talk]]) 11:09, 12 January 2014 (UTC) | ||
# I really do love this picture. The reflection of Lorule really enforces the mood of the game. It still graces my desktop well. [[User:WilliamLC|William]] ([[ | # I really do love this picture. The reflection of Lorule really enforces the mood of the game. It still graces my desktop well. [[User:WilliamLC|William]] ([[User talk:WilliamLC|Talk]]) 19:55, 26 May 2014 (UTC) | ||
{{Oppose}} | {{Oppose}} | ||
{{Neutral}} | {{Neutral}} | ||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 19:37, 13 August 2022
Failed Picture Nominations
The following sections are picture nominations which either expired or received a score of -3.