Zelda Wiki:Failed Nominations/Picture: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Text replacement - "{{support}}" to "{{Support}}") |
mNo edit summary |
||
(25 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| header= [[:File:lightsword.jpg|Lightsword.jpg]] — Failed April 3, 2008 | | header= [[:File:lightsword.jpg|Lightsword.jpg]] — Failed April 3, 2008 | ||
| content= [[File:lightsword.jpg|frame]] | | content= [[File:lightsword.jpg|frame]] | ||
An amazing picture that to me, shows the true potential of the Master Sword. --[[User:Seablue254|Seablue254]] 17:25, 2 April 2008 (EDT) | An amazing picture that to me, shows the true potential of the Master Sword. --[[User:Seablue254@legacy41958407|Seablue254]] 17:25, 2 April 2008 (EDT) | ||
{{Oppose}} | {{Oppose}} | ||
#Its a bit to fuzzy--[[User:Zanramon|Zanramon ( ' .' ) look its kirby ['_>']]] 17:42, 2 April 2008 (EDT) | #Its a bit to fuzzy--[[User:Zanramon@legacy41958083|Zanramon ( ' .' ) look its kirby ['_>']]] 17:42, 2 April 2008 (EDT) | ||
#Zanramons right, it's too fuzy. --[[User:Link hero of light|Link hero of light]] 21:06, 2 April 2008 (EDT) | #Zanramons right, it's too fuzy. --[[User:Link hero of light@legacy41958106|Link hero of light]] 21:06, 2 April 2008 (EDT) | ||
#I also agree. It's incredibly low-resolution as well. --[[User: | #I also agree. It's incredibly low-resolution as well. --[[User:GoldenChaos|Jase]] 07:45, 3 April 2008 (EDT) | ||
#It's too fizy.--[[User:Article and Picture Voter|Article and Picture Voter]] 11:25, 3 April 2008 (EDT) | #It's too fizy.--[[User:Article and Picture Voter|Article and Picture Voter]] 11:25, 3 April 2008 (EDT) | ||
{{clear}} | {{clear}} | ||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
| header= 1243690847 64601fc368.jpg — Failed April 4, 2008 | | header= 1243690847 64601fc368.jpg — Failed April 4, 2008 | ||
| content= | | content= | ||
Clear picture and as far as I know, ZW.org is the only zelda wiki that has a picture of zelda action figures.--[[User:Link hero of light|Link hero of light]] 17:55, 24 March 2008 (EDT) | Clear picture and as far as I know, ZW.org is the only zelda wiki that has a picture of zelda action figures.--[[User:Link hero of light@legacy41958106|Link hero of light]] 17:55, 24 March 2008 (EDT) | ||
{{Support}} | {{Support}} | ||
# I think it'd be fun to have a picture of the toy Zant up.<font color=red>''' (Unsigned vote by [[User:Blood Rayne|Blood Rayne]] - see rule 6 above)'''</font> | # I think it'd be fun to have a picture of the toy Zant up.<font color=red>''' (Unsigned vote by [[User:Blood Rayne|Blood Rayne]] - see rule 6 above)'''</font> | ||
{{Oppose}} | {{Oppose}} | ||
#Not one for me, I'm afraid. Neither the image or the figure itself are particularly good. | #Not one for me, I'm afraid. Neither the image or the figure itself are particularly good. {{:User:Adam660@legacy41957735/sig}} 15:19, 26 March 2008 (EDT) | ||
#No this picture aint that great —[[User:lom678|lom678]] | #No this picture aint that great —[[User:lom678|lom678]] | ||
#It's not necessarily a bad or incredibly common image, but it doesn't quite seem worthy of being featured to me. --[[User:Douken|Douken]] 20:11, 4 April 2008 (EDT) | #It's not necessarily a bad or incredibly common image, but it doesn't quite seem worthy of being featured to me. --[[User:Douken@legacy41958225|Douken]] 20:11, 4 April 2008 (EDT) | ||
{{clear}} | {{clear}} | ||
}} | }} | ||
Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
{{Support}} | {{Support}} | ||
#Interesting. I think the Wind Waker graphics could use a bit of Twilight Princess dust, but 3D 'Toon Link looks rather cute. --[[User:Emeryn|Emeryn]] 19:41, 3 April 2008 (EDT) | #Interesting. I think the Wind Waker graphics could use a bit of Twilight Princess dust, but 3D 'Toon Link looks rather cute. --[[User:Emeryn|Emeryn]] 19:41, 3 April 2008 (EDT) | ||
#My little sister is one who nominated this, but sibling rivalry aside :), this is a pretty good picture.--[[User:Link hero of light|Link hero of light]] 19:47, 3 April 2008 (EDT) | #My little sister is one who nominated this, but sibling rivalry aside :), this is a pretty good picture.--[[User:Link hero of light@legacy41958106|Link hero of light]] 19:47, 3 April 2008 (EDT) | ||
#I agree. this is a cool picture from a cool game! Let's feature it! --[[User:Seablue254|Seablue254]] 15:23, 4 April 2008 (EDT) | #I agree. this is a cool picture from a cool game! Let's feature it! --[[User:Seablue254@legacy41958407|Seablue254]] 15:23, 4 April 2008 (EDT) | ||
#Appart from this person being my username. This picture is clear and just awesome.--[[User:Toon Link|Toon Link]] 21:01, 4 April 2008 (EDT) | #Appart from this person being my username. This picture is clear and just awesome.--[[User:Toon Link@legacy41958368|Toon Link]] 21:01, 4 April 2008 (EDT) | ||
#One pick that definetly deserves to be featured.--[[User:The Legend of Zelda|The Legend of Zelda]] 00:34, 12 April 2008 (UTC) | #One pick that definetly deserves to be featured.--[[User:The Legend of Zelda|The Legend of Zelda]] 00:34, 12 April 2008 (UTC) | ||
#this picture should without a doubt be featured.--[[User:Gillispie]] 15:52, 14 April | #this picture should without a doubt be featured.--[[User:Gillispie]] 15:52, 14 April | ||
Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
#He's my best Brawl character and my favorite Link incarnation--[[User:IceySheegoth|IceySheegoth]]11:24,28 April 2008 (PT) | #He's my best Brawl character and my favorite Link incarnation--[[User:IceySheegoth|IceySheegoth]]11:24,28 April 2008 (PT) | ||
{{Oppose}} | {{Oppose}} | ||
#I really like this picture and think that it should eventually be a featured picture. But Brawl has been out for less than a month and I don't think we should have spoilers of this level on the main page. --[[User:Hisak|Hisak]] 21:24, 3 April 2008 (EDT) | #I really like this picture and think that it should eventually be a featured picture. But Brawl has been out for less than a month and I don't think we should have spoilers of this level on the main page. --[[User:Hisak@legacy41957245|Hisak]] 21:24, 3 April 2008 (EDT) | ||
#I agree with Hisak. At this point of time, this is still spoiler worthy for those few Zelda fans who don't know about it.[[User: | #I agree with Hisak. At this point of time, this is still spoiler worthy for those few Zelda fans who don't know about it.[[User:Mases554@legacy41957662|Mases]] 16:51, 28 April 2008 (UTC) | ||
#Truthfully, I don't see the difference between any of the Smash Bros. pictures on this Wiki, besides the character standing in them. They're pretty standard pictures. I also agree with Hisak and Mases. At least feature it later on... --[[User:Yuvorias|Yuvorias]] 12:57, 29 April 2008 (EST) | #Truthfully, I don't see the difference between any of the Smash Bros. pictures on this Wiki, besides the character standing in them. They're pretty standard pictures. I also agree with Hisak and Mases. At least feature it later on... --[[User:Yuvorias@legacy41958105|Yuvorias]] 12:57, 29 April 2008 (EST) | ||
{{clear}} | {{clear}} | ||
}} | }} | ||
Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
{{Support}} | {{Support}} | ||
#i love Zant! He is probably one of the coolest bosses. And Twilight Princess was my first Zelda game. I love his story he tells you. --TwilightKing2 | #i love Zant! He is probably one of the coolest bosses. And Twilight Princess was my first Zelda game. I love his story he tells you. --TwilightKing2 | ||
#As he recently became my favourite boss, I'll give my month's vote to Zant. It is an awesome picture. From the Wii, I notice. --[[User:Yuvorias|Yuvorias]] | #As he recently became my favourite boss, I'll give my month's vote to Zant. It is an awesome picture. From the Wii, I notice. --[[User:Yuvorias@legacy41958105|Yuvorias]] | ||
{{Oppose}} | {{Oppose}} | ||
#The pictures a little too fuzzy --[[User:Seablue254|David]] <sup>([[User talk:Seablue254|T]] : [[Special:Contributions/Seablue254|C]])</sup> 21:12, 14 April 2008 (UTC) | #The pictures a little too fuzzy --[[User:Seablue254@legacy41958407|David]] <sup>([[User talk:Seablue254@legacy41958407|T]] : [[Special:Contributions/Seablue254@legacy41958407|C]])</sup> 21:12, 14 April 2008 (UTC) | ||
#It's not a bad picture, but the quality could be a little better if it's to be featured... --[[User:Douken|Douken]] 22:04, 7 May 2008 (UTC) | #It's not a bad picture, but the quality could be a little better if it's to be featured... --[[User:Douken@legacy41958225|Douken]] 22:04, 7 May 2008 (UTC) | ||
#Yeah, although the quality is ok as screenshots go, it's still not really good enough for featured status. Plus, Zant is already a featured article, so I don't really think he qualifies as a featured picture nominee as well. --[[User: | #Yeah, although the quality is ok as screenshots go, it's still not really good enough for featured status. Plus, Zant is already a featured article, so I don't really think he qualifies as a featured picture nominee as well. --[[User:Adam660@legacy41957735|Adam]] 05:31, 8 May 2008 (UTC) | ||
{{clear}} | {{clear}} | ||
}} | }} | ||
Line 65: | Line 65: | ||
| header= [[:File:OoT Link Spin Attack Artwork.jpg|Spinattack.jpg]] — Failed May 8, 2008 | | header= [[:File:OoT Link Spin Attack Artwork.jpg|Spinattack.jpg]] — Failed May 8, 2008 | ||
| content= [[File:OoT Link Spin Attack Artwork.jpg|thumb|right]] | | content= [[File:OoT Link Spin Attack Artwork.jpg|thumb|right]] | ||
One of the more epic Ocarina of Time pictures and one of Link's signiture attacks--[[User:Magnus orion|Magnus orion]] 17:25, 26 March 2008 (EDT) | One of the more epic Ocarina of Time pictures and one of Link's signiture attacks--[[User:Magnus orion@legacy41958278|Magnus orion]] 17:25, 26 March 2008 (EDT) | ||
{{Support}} | {{Support}} | ||
#This is a cool picture, and Deku Babas are so cool.--[[User:Article and Picture Voter|Article and Picture Voter]] 19:44, 1 April 2008 (EDT) | #This is a cool picture, and Deku Babas are so cool.--[[User:Article and Picture Voter|Article and Picture Voter]] 19:44, 1 April 2008 (EDT) | ||
{{Oppose}} | {{Oppose}} | ||
#Maybe if it was the original picture, but as this is a wallpaper made from the art, no [[User:TheManInTheMoon|TheManInTheMoon]] 07:32, 28 April 2008 (UTC) | #Maybe if it was the original picture, but as this is a wallpaper made from the art, no [[User:TheManInTheMoon@legacy41957941|TheManInTheMoon]] 07:32, 28 April 2008 (UTC) | ||
#I'm with ManInTheMoon on this. --[[User:Douken|Douken]] 22:04, 7 May 2008 (UTC) | #I'm with ManInTheMoon on this. --[[User:Douken@legacy41958225|Douken]] 22:04, 7 May 2008 (UTC) | ||
#Yeah, to be honest, [http://www.zeldawiki.org/images/archive/c/cb/20070319190520%21Spinattack.jpg the version] which was initially nominated made me think immediately "no way". Then I reverted it to it's first and current version, and thought I'd leave it to others to make opinions first. However, I'm in agreement that in it's current form this image doesn't cut it.--[[User: | #Yeah, to be honest, [http://www.zeldawiki.org/images/archive/c/cb/20070319190520%21Spinattack.jpg the version] which was initially nominated made me think immediately "no way". Then I reverted it to it's first and current version, and thought I'd leave it to others to make opinions first. However, I'm in agreement that in it's current form this image doesn't cut it.--[[User:Adam660@legacy41957735|Adam]] 05:33, 8 May 2008 (UTC) | ||
{{clear}} | {{clear}} | ||
}} | }} | ||
Line 79: | Line 79: | ||
| header= [[:File:ALttP Sacred Grove Artwork.png|Mastersword.jpeg]] — Failed May 10, 2008 | | header= [[:File:ALttP Sacred Grove Artwork.png|Mastersword.jpeg]] — Failed May 10, 2008 | ||
| content= [[File:ALttP Sacred Grove Artwork.png|thumb|200px]] | | content= [[File:ALttP Sacred Grove Artwork.png|thumb|200px]] | ||
This picture of the Master Sword is breathtakingly beautiful, in my opinion. It deserves this status. --[[User:Yuvorias|Mr. Mystery]], 12:13, 9 May 2008 (EST) | This picture of the Master Sword is breathtakingly beautiful, in my opinion. It deserves this status. --[[User:Yuvorias@legacy41958105|Mr. Mystery]], 12:13, 9 May 2008 (EST) | ||
{{Support}} | {{Support}} | ||
{{Oppose}} | {{Oppose}} | ||
#Yeah, I have to oppose this one. The article [[Master Sword]] is also nominated, and it looks like it'll pretty soon end up being featured. That being the case, this image will already be on the main page anyway! (Oh yeah, and also [[:File:Ootmastersword.jpeg|this image]] has already been featured pretty recently too! Need I go on?) --[[User: | #Yeah, I have to oppose this one. The article [[Master Sword]] is also nominated, and it looks like it'll pretty soon end up being featured. That being the case, this image will already be on the main page anyway! (Oh yeah, and also [[:File:Ootmastersword.jpeg|this image]] has already been featured pretty recently too! Need I go on?) --[[User:Adam660@legacy41957735|Adam]] 21:10, 9 May 2008 (UTC) | ||
#I have to agree with Adam on this. And apart from that, the is not all that great.--[[User:Link hero of light|Link hero of light]] 22:54, 9 May 2008 (UTC) | #I have to agree with Adam on this. And apart from that, the is not all that great.--[[User:Link hero of light@legacy41958106|Link hero of light]] 22:54, 9 May 2008 (UTC) | ||
#This image is not that good in quality. The only good thing in the image is the Master Sword. The quality of the sword in the March 24, 2008 image in much better.--[[User: | #This image is not that good in quality. The only good thing in the image is the Master Sword. The quality of the sword in the March 24, 2008 image in much better.--[[User:Emma|Emma]] 04:03, 10 May 2008 (UTC) | ||
{{clear}} | {{clear}} | ||
}} | }} | ||
Line 98: | Line 98: | ||
{{Oppose}} | {{Oppose}} | ||
#I like the subject matter, and there really ''should'' be a featured pic of the final epic duel between Link and Ganondorf, but when I take a look at the full-sized image, it's just too blurry. When I played the game, I was fairly sure that I could make out more of Ganondorf's facial features than a couple of dots and a curved line for his eyes and mouth. For the time being, it's a no. If you could find a cleaned up version of it, I would certainly vote for it. | #I like the subject matter, and there really ''should'' be a featured pic of the final epic duel between Link and Ganondorf, but when I take a look at the full-sized image, it's just too blurry. When I played the game, I was fairly sure that I could make out more of Ganondorf's facial features than a couple of dots and a curved line for his eyes and mouth. For the time being, it's a no. If you could find a cleaned up version of it, I would certainly vote for it. | ||
#I agree, it's definately more clear on the game. As soon as it's cleared up, it'll have my vote. --[[User:Yuvorias|Mr. Mystery]], 11:17, 11 May 2008 (EST) | #I agree, it's definately more clear on the game. As soon as it's cleared up, it'll have my vote. --[[User:Yuvorias@legacy41958105|Mr. Mystery]], 11:17, 11 May 2008 (EST) | ||
#I don't think it should ever be featured, clear or not.--[[User:Link hero of light|Link hero of light]] 02:03, 11 May 2008 (UTC) | #I don't think it should ever be featured, clear or not.--[[User:Link hero of light@legacy41958106|Link hero of light]] 02:03, 11 May 2008 (UTC) | ||
{{clear}} | {{clear}} | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{hide | {{hide | ||
| header= [[:File:TMC | | header= [[:File:TMC Dark Hyrule Castle Artwork.png|Darkhyrulecastle.jpg]] — Failed due to invalid nomination | ||
| content= [[File:TMC | | content= [[File:TMC Dark Hyrule Castle Artwork.png|thumb|275px]] | ||
At the core of Zelda gameplay there are battles. This image perfectly captures that element in all games.--[[User:041744|041744]] 04:16, 17 May 2008 (UTC) | At the core of Zelda gameplay there are battles. This image perfectly captures that element in all games.--[[User:041744|041744]] 04:16, 17 May 2008 (UTC) | ||
{{Support}} | {{Support}} | ||
{{Oppose}} | {{Oppose}} | ||
#More duplicates? We've already very recently featured a picture of [[:File:Link Darknuts.jpg|Link fighting Darknuts]]. While this is a nice image, it would have to wait until the other had been disqualified before a nomination would get anywhere. We have thousands of images here at ZW, surely we don't need to have repeats within a selection of the 16 best ones? --[[User: | #More duplicates? We've already very recently featured a picture of [[:File:Link Darknuts.jpg|Link fighting Darknuts]]. While this is a nice image, it would have to wait until the other had been disqualified before a nomination would get anywhere. We have thousands of images here at ZW, surely we don't need to have repeats within a selection of the 16 best ones? --[[User:Adam660@legacy41957735|Adam]] 07:21, 17 May 2008 (UTC) | ||
#This should not have even been nominated. It does not have any templates. Also, there was already four images up for voting - at the time of its nomination. We don't need featured images similar to ones we already have.--[[User: | #This should not have even been nominated. It does not have any templates. Also, there was already four images up for voting - at the time of its nomination. We don't need featured images similar to ones we already have.--[[User:Emma|Emma]] 08:52, 17 May 2008 (UTC) | ||
{{clear}} | {{clear}} | ||
}} | }} | ||
Line 123: | Line 123: | ||
{{Oppose}} | {{Oppose}} | ||
#I'm going to have to say no on this one. This image is too small. Also, there already is a featured picture with the King of Red Lions in it. In fact, the pose looks almost identical in both. and the other image is much larger.--[[User: | #I'm going to have to say no on this one. This image is too small. Also, there already is a featured picture with the King of Red Lions in it. In fact, the pose looks almost identical in both. and the other image is much larger.--[[User:Emma|Emma]] 22:05, 12 May 2008 (UTC) | ||
#I'm saying no to it as well for all of the above reasons, plus the fact that there seems to be little to the picture itself. Okay, it's the KoRL in a generic pose, so what? A featured picture should capture the essence of the moment, like reuniting Anju and Kafei or link claiming the master sword, etc..--[[User:Rdnckj258|Rdnckj258]] 23:18, 13 May 2008 (UTC) | #I'm saying no to it as well for all of the above reasons, plus the fact that there seems to be little to the picture itself. Okay, it's the KoRL in a generic pose, so what? A featured picture should capture the essence of the moment, like reuniting Anju and Kafei or link claiming the master sword, etc..--[[User:Rdnckj258@legacy41958350|Rdnckj258]] 23:18, 13 May 2008 (UTC) | ||
#Yeah, I find it kind of funny that almost directly below this image is an identical version of it included in [[:File: | #Yeah, I find it kind of funny that almost directly below this image is an identical version of it included in [[:File:TWW Scene Artwork.jpg|another featured picture]] :) --[[User:Adam660@legacy41957735|Adam]] 07:21, 17 May 2008 (UTC) | ||
{{Clear}} | {{Clear}} | ||
}} | }} | ||
Line 132: | Line 132: | ||
| header= [[:File:TP Twilit Bloat Render.png|TP Twilit Bloat Render.png]] — Failed June 17, 2008 | | header= [[:File:TP Twilit Bloat Render.png|TP Twilit Bloat Render.png]] — Failed June 17, 2008 | ||
| content= [[File:TP Twilit Bloat Render.png|thumb|275px]] | | content= [[File:TP Twilit Bloat Render.png|thumb|275px]] | ||
This picture was cool before, but now that it has been cleared up, it's just amazing! This really deserves a feature.--[[User:Link hero of light|Link hero of light]] 21:03, 29 April 2008 (UTC) | This picture was cool before, but now that it has been cleared up, it's just amazing! This really deserves a feature.--[[User:Link hero of light@legacy41958106|Link hero of light]] 21:03, 29 April 2008 (UTC) | ||
{{Support}} | {{Support}} | ||
#It's official. This picture is so awesome it owns all the haters out there. --[[User:Seablue254|Seablue254]] 12:21, 3 May 2008 (UTC) | #It's official. This picture is so awesome it owns all the haters out there. --[[User:Seablue254@legacy41958407|Seablue254]] 12:21, 3 May 2008 (UTC) | ||
#Yeah, it took me ''soooooooo'' long to mess about with the wing edges adding transparency - It'd be nice to see this one featured ;) --[[User: | #Yeah, it took me ''soooooooo'' long to mess about with the wing edges adding transparency - It'd be nice to see this one featured ;) --[[User:Adam660@legacy41957735|Adam]] 21:21, 27 May 2008 (UTC) | ||
#I'll give it my vote. It is a nice picture. --[[User:Yuvorias|Yuvorias]], 9:52, 30 May 2008 (EST) | #I'll give it my vote. It is a nice picture. --[[User:Yuvorias@legacy41958105|Yuvorias]], 9:52, 30 May 2008 (EST) | ||
#Even before the image was touched up it seemed feature-worthy, so it definitely has my vote now. --[[User:Douken|Douken]] 19:56, 13 June 2008 (UTC) | #Even before the image was touched up it seemed feature-worthy, so it definitely has my vote now. --[[User:Douken@legacy41958225|Douken]] 19:56, 13 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
#This picture is so detailed, and the beast is at an angle that perfectly reveals all of its best features. ^_^ --[[User:Fairy Boy|Fairy Boy]], 10:06, 20 June 2008 (CST) | #This picture is so detailed, and the beast is at an angle that perfectly reveals all of its best features. ^_^ --[[User:Fairy Boy|Fairy Boy]], 10:06, 20 June 2008 (CST) | ||
Line 144: | Line 144: | ||
# try again. --[[User:The Legend of Zelda|The Legend of Zelda]] 02:50, 6 May 2008 (UTC) | # try again. --[[User:The Legend of Zelda|The Legend of Zelda]] 02:50, 6 May 2008 (UTC) | ||
# the thing is creepy and unusally is hard to beat it after you beat the a lot of times --[[User:Lightningtom|Lightningtom]] 19:47, June 8, 2008 (UTC) | # the thing is creepy and unusally is hard to beat it after you beat the a lot of times --[[User:Lightningtom|Lightningtom]] 19:47, June 8, 2008 (UTC) | ||
#I think it's pretty cool and very nice graphics but I don't know...--[[User:ZeldaGirl96|ZeldaGirl96]] 17:53, 17 June 2008 (UTC) | #I think it's pretty cool and very nice graphics but I don't know...--[[User:ZeldaGirl96@legacy41958649|ZeldaGirl96]] 17:53, 17 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
#If nominated, this would have been a "one out of many" image. We can't have that.--[[User: | #If nominated, this would have been a "one out of many" image. We can't have that.--[[User:Emma|Emma]] 17:56, 17 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
{{clear}} | {{clear}} | ||
}} | }} | ||
Line 152: | Line 152: | ||
| header= Desertcolossus.jpg — Failed June 28, 2008 | | header= Desertcolossus.jpg — Failed June 28, 2008 | ||
| content= | | content= | ||
Though not obvious or straightforward, the Desert Colossus seems to have a majestic yet subtle beauty breaking through the limitations of a Nintendo 64's specs. The goddess receives little attention, and I barely even noticed it on my first playthrough of ''Ocarina of Time'', but this image perfectly captures a grace which so many eyes seem to miss... and for that, I believe it deserves to be featured. --[[User:Douken|Douken]] 19:54, 13 June 2008 (UTC) | Though not obvious or straightforward, the Desert Colossus seems to have a majestic yet subtle beauty breaking through the limitations of a Nintendo 64's specs. The goddess receives little attention, and I barely even noticed it on my first playthrough of ''Ocarina of Time'', but this image perfectly captures a grace which so many eyes seem to miss... and for that, I believe it deserves to be featured. --[[User:Douken@legacy41958225|Douken]] 19:54, 13 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
{{Support}} | {{Support}} | ||
Line 158: | Line 158: | ||
{{Oppose}} | {{Oppose}} | ||
#Even though the image is large, I not comfortable with featuring a screenshot from a game with such primitive graphics. I'm not seeing any of this beauty you speak of. I'm sure that others won't either. I am also uncomfortable with us featuring an image portraying a statue of a goddess that isn't even confirmed to exist in the "''The Legend of Zelda'' universe." So I'm saying no. {{:User: | #Even though the image is large, I not comfortable with featuring a screenshot from a game with such primitive graphics. I'm not seeing any of this beauty you speak of. I'm sure that others won't either. I am also uncomfortable with us featuring an image portraying a statue of a goddess that isn't even confirmed to exist in the "''The Legend of Zelda'' universe." So I'm saying no. {{:User:Emma/sig|~}} <span style="color:#C0C0C0;">20:33, June 24, 2008 (UTC)</span> | ||
#I'd been meaning to voice my opinion on this for a while. Don't get me wrong, I really like the image (I did upload it after all!). However, it's not actually an official image. As you'll see from the source link I added to the image page, it's from a fan-made high-res texture mod. In the light of the recent conflagratory mega-debate over fan-made content, I'm not about to base my objection solely on this fact. My problem is that the image is misleading; the actual in-game visual is more like [http://www.zeldawiki.org/images/archive/5/58/20080129194504%21Desertcolossus.jpg this]. {{:User: | #I'd been meaning to voice my opinion on this for a while. Don't get me wrong, I really like the image (I did upload it after all!). However, it's not actually an official image. As you'll see from the source link I added to the image page, it's from a fan-made high-res texture mod. In the light of the recent conflagratory mega-debate over fan-made content, I'm not about to base my objection solely on this fact. My problem is that the image is misleading; the actual in-game visual is more like [http://www.zeldawiki.org/images/archive/5/58/20080129194504%21Desertcolossus.jpg this]. {{:User:Adam660@legacy41957735/sig}} 15:52, 28 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
#I've also missed that in my first play through as well. The only problem with the picture is that it has been edited with federilli's (excuse me if I'm spelling this wrong) high resolution texture pack. Therefore it's treated as fan art and, as Adam has said, can be misleading.'''{{:User:Steven2113/sig}} | #I've also missed that in my first play through as well. The only problem with the picture is that it has been edited with federilli's (excuse me if I'm spelling this wrong) high resolution texture pack. Therefore it's treated as fan art and, as Adam has said, can be misleading.'''{{:User:Steven2113@legacy41958623/sig}} | ||
''' | ''' | ||
{{clear}} | {{clear}} | ||
Line 166: | Line 166: | ||
{{hide | {{hide | ||
| header= [[:File: | | header= [[:File:User Link54625.jpg|Link evo.jpg]] — Failed July 6, 2008 | ||
| content= [[File: | | content= [[File:User Link54625.jpg|thumb|200px]] | ||
A very cool and good sized picture depicting changes in how Link looks through the years {{:User:Seablue254/sig}} 13:43, 1 July 2008 (UTC) | A very cool and good sized picture depicting changes in how Link looks through the years {{:User:Seablue254@legacy41958407/sig}} 13:43, 1 July 2008 (UTC) | ||
{{Support}} | {{Support}} | ||
Line 175: | Line 175: | ||
{{Oppose}} | {{Oppose}} | ||
#It’s a good picture, but I personally don’t think fan art should be used for the main page image. --[[User:Paulreilly86|Paulreilly86]] 14:11, 6 July 2008 (UTC) | #It’s a good picture, but I personally don’t think fan art should be used for the main page image. --[[User:Paulreilly86|Paulreilly86]] 14:11, 6 July 2008 (UTC) | ||
#Sorry, Sea, but I've gotta oppose this. It's kind of neat to see the "progression" of Link, so to speak, but the picture itself isn't very cool-looking. Just a few pictures of Link pasted together. Kind of boring if you ask me. {{:User:Ando1400/sig}} 15:58, 6 July 2008 (UTC) | #Sorry, Sea, but I've gotta oppose this. It's kind of neat to see the "progression" of Link, so to speak, but the picture itself isn't very cool-looking. Just a few pictures of Link pasted together. Kind of boring if you ask me. {{:User:Ando1400@legacy41958204/sig}} 15:58, 6 July 2008 (UTC) | ||
#As Ando said: "Sorry, Sea". I have to oppose this too. It is a neat image in that it compares the differences of Link in the games. But a collage of images isn't exactly outstanding. It isn't what we are looking for in a featured picture.{{:User: | #As Ando said: "Sorry, Sea". I have to oppose this too. It is a neat image in that it compares the differences of Link in the games. But a collage of images isn't exactly outstanding. It isn't what we are looking for in a featured picture.{{:User:Emma/sig|~}} <span style="color:#C0C0C0;">16:10, July 6, 2008 (UTC)</span> | ||
{{clear}} | {{clear}} | ||
}} | }} | ||
Line 183: | Line 183: | ||
| header= [[:File:TP Ganon Render.png|TP Ganon Render.png]] — Failed August 6, 2008 | | header= [[:File:TP Ganon Render.png|TP Ganon Render.png]] — Failed August 6, 2008 | ||
| content= [[File:TP Ganon Render.png|thumb|200px]] | | content= [[File:TP Ganon Render.png|thumb|200px]] | ||
This form of Ganon is really cool and fearsome--[[User:Magnus orion|Magnus orion]] 23:32, 8 May 2008 (UTC) | This form of Ganon is really cool and fearsome--[[User:Magnus orion@legacy41958278|Magnus orion]] 23:32, 8 May 2008 (UTC) | ||
{{Support}} | {{Support}} | ||
# 2 words Ganondorf rules. He is the coolest character in Zelda and Smash Bros. He rules.--[[User:Chaosmaster03|Chaosmaster03]], 11:50 4 June 2008 (EST) | # 2 words Ganondorf rules. He is the coolest character in Zelda and Smash Bros. He rules.--[[User:Chaosmaster03|Chaosmaster03]], 11:50 4 June 2008 (EST) | ||
#I'd like to see this one featured. IMO probably the best Ganon character design to date. {{:User: | #I'd like to see this one featured. IMO probably the best Ganon character design to date. {{:User:Adam660@legacy41957735/sig}}15:52, 28 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
#I'd also like to see this one featured. Fairly large, high quality, and we need at least one featured picture of Ganon.--[[User:Rdnckj258|Rdnckj258]] 14:13, 29 June 2008 (UTC) | #I'd also like to see this one featured. Fairly large, high quality, and we need at least one featured picture of Ganon.--[[User:Rdnckj258@legacy41958350|Rdnckj258]] 14:13, 29 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
#Ganon is amazing. One of the baddest video game villans, if not, THE baddest video game villan ever.--[[User:Zeldagirl93 | #Ganon is amazing. One of the baddest video game villans, if not, THE baddest video game villan ever.--[[User:Zeldagirl93@legacy41958063}Zeldagirl93]] 17:00, 1 July 2008 (EST) | ||
#This picture is the awesomest! Just gives you the feel of Ganon being one of the baddest villains in Nintendo. You've gotta admit, Ganon is kinda cool!--[[User:Akki|Akki]] 23:54, 8 July 2008 (EST) | #This picture is the awesomest! Just gives you the feel of Ganon being one of the baddest villains in Nintendo. You've gotta admit, Ganon is kinda cool!--[[User:Akki|Akki]] 23:54, 8 July 2008 (EST) | ||
#I prefer this picture compared to the other one and since no-one's voted on either for a while. . . --[[User:AmrasCalmacil|AmrasCalmacil]] 11:04, 1 August 2008 (UTC) | #I prefer this picture compared to the other one and since no-one's voted on either for a while. . . --[[User:AmrasCalmacil|AmrasCalmacil]] 11:04, 1 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
Line 201: | Line 201: | ||
{{hide | {{hide | ||
| header= [[:File:TMC | | header= [[:File:TMC Dark Hyrule Castle Artwork.png|Darkhyrulecastle.jpg]] ''(nomination 2)'' — Failed due to invalid nomination | ||
| content= | | content= | ||
[[File:TMC | [[File:TMC Dark Hyrule Castle Artwork.png|thumb|200px]] | ||
This picture was taken from The Minish Cap. The picture shows Link battling against a Darknut in Dark Hyrule Castle. I chose this picture because I like to fight against Darknuts because they look cool! --[[User: Draonjioel|Draonjioel]] 20:35, 6 August 2008 (UTC) | This picture was taken from The Minish Cap. The picture shows Link battling against a Darknut in Dark Hyrule Castle. I chose this picture because I like to fight against Darknuts because they look cool! --[[User: Draonjioel|Draonjioel]] 20:35, 6 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
{{Support}} | {{Support}} | ||
{{Oppose}} | {{Oppose}} | ||
'''Invalid nomination. Already failed just a few months ago (see [[#Darknut Duel|above]])''' {{:User: | '''Invalid nomination. Already failed just a few months ago (see [[#Darknut Duel|above]])''' {{:User:Adam660@legacy41957735/sig}} 17:11, 7 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
{{clear}} | {{clear}} | ||
}} | }} | ||
Line 215: | Line 215: | ||
| header= [[:File:ALttP Master Sword Artwork.png|Master Sword.png]] — Failed August 21, 2008, withdrawn by nominating user | | header= [[:File:ALttP Master Sword Artwork.png|Master Sword.png]] — Failed August 21, 2008, withdrawn by nominating user | ||
| content= [[File:ALttP Master Sword Artwork.png|frameless|right|80px]] | | content= [[File:ALttP Master Sword Artwork.png|frameless|right|80px]] | ||
Since we are going for more of the out-of-the-ordinary featured images. I thought I'd nominate this one. It is a very large and detailed image of the [[Master Sword]] from {{ALttP}}. This image is very beautiful and is quite breath-taking. It is a great image. It deserves to be featured.{{:User: | Since we are going for more of the out-of-the-ordinary featured images. I thought I'd nominate this one. It is a very large and detailed image of the [[Master Sword]] from {{ALttP}}. This image is very beautiful and is quite breath-taking. It is a great image. It deserves to be featured.{{:User:Emma/sig|~}} <span style="color:#C0C0C0;">22:59, August 16, 2008 (UTC)</span> | ||
<!-- This image uses the "frameless" option. I'm hoping that this will become the standard as it looks much better than the "thumb" option. Other than the frame-less part and captions, "frameless" behaves just like "thumb". --> | <!-- This image uses the "frameless" option. I'm hoping that this will become the standard as it looks much better than the "thumb" option. Other than the frame-less part and captions, "frameless" behaves just like "thumb". --> | ||
Line 221: | Line 221: | ||
#I think it is a beautiful picture, The Master Sword is something that draws my interest, it should be featured.-The Sage of Cosmos | #I think it is a beautiful picture, The Master Sword is something that draws my interest, it should be featured.-The Sage of Cosmos | ||
{{Oppose}} | {{Oppose}} | ||
#I'm afraid that I have to oppose this one. We have already Featured both the [[Master Sword]] article, and an [[:File:Ootmastersword.jpeg|image featuring the sword prominently]]. Adding this one would, in my view, put too much emphasis one one subject. I don't think we can really justify featuring an article and picture of the same subject under any circumstance. I would suggest that this image be used to replace the current one shown Template:FA/33|here; that way it can appear on the Main Page without having to be individually featured. {{:User: | #I'm afraid that I have to oppose this one. We have already Featured both the [[Master Sword]] article, and an [[:File:Ootmastersword.jpeg|image featuring the sword prominently]]. Adding this one would, in my view, put too much emphasis one one subject. I don't think we can really justify featuring an article and picture of the same subject under any circumstance. I would suggest that this image be used to replace the current one shown Template:FA/33|here; that way it can appear on the Main Page without having to be individually featured. {{:User:Adam660@legacy41957735/sig}} 05:24, 19 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
#My sentiments echo Adam's. I should know, I was the one who nominated the Article, as well as another image of the Master Sword that was soundly rejected. And this is far more boring than the one I nominated, in my view. At least the Empty Bottle was original. Also, there's a Link Vs Darknut image which is periodically disqualified from these nominations almost for the same reason as here. If we put this up, wouldn't that be kind of [[Wikipedia:Two_Face|two-faced]]? --[[User:Yuvorias|Felicia's Champion]] 02:31, 21 August 2008 (UTC) | #My sentiments echo Adam's. I should know, I was the one who nominated the Article, as well as another image of the Master Sword that was soundly rejected. And this is far more boring than the one I nominated, in my view. At least the Empty Bottle was original. Also, there's a Link Vs Darknut image which is periodically disqualified from these nominations almost for the same reason as here. If we put this up, wouldn't that be kind of [[Wikipedia:Two_Face|two-faced]]? --[[User:Yuvorias@legacy41958105|Felicia's Champion]] 02:31, 21 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
{{Clear}} | {{Clear}} | ||
}} | }} | ||
Line 229: | Line 229: | ||
| header= [[:File:TWW Empty Bottle Artwork.png|Emptybottle.png]] — Failed August 20, 2008 | | header= [[:File:TWW Empty Bottle Artwork.png|Emptybottle.png]] — Failed August 20, 2008 | ||
| content= [[File:TWW Empty Bottle Artwork.png|thumb|200px]] | | content= [[File:TWW Empty Bottle Artwork.png|thumb|200px]] | ||
Yes, it's simple. That's why I like it. It's also highly representative of the artistic style of The Wind Waker, as well as featuring one of the most sought after and valuable items in the Zelda series. Let's feature something a little unusual! <small>(P.S. Thanks to [[ | Yes, it's simple. That's why I like it. It's also highly representative of the artistic style of The Wind Waker, as well as featuring one of the most sought after and valuable items in the Zelda series. Let's feature something a little unusual! <small>(P.S. Thanks to [[User:Steven|Steven]] for the great render ;)</small> {{:User:Adam660@legacy41957735/sig}} 11:42, 10 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
{{Support}} | {{Support}} | ||
#I have to agree. Wind Waker does have great artwork. I love it. And bottles are a neccesity. I do like Twilight Princess and have never played Phantom Hourglass. But this bottle looks cool.[[User:CoreyPotter|CoreyPotter]] 00:59, 11 August 2008 (UTC)CoreyPotter | #I have to agree. Wind Waker does have great artwork. I love it. And bottles are a neccesity. I do like Twilight Princess and have never played Phantom Hourglass. But this bottle looks cool.[[User:CoreyPotter|CoreyPotter]] 00:59, 11 August 2008 (UTC)CoreyPotter | ||
Line 235: | Line 235: | ||
{{Oppose}} | {{Oppose}} | ||
#While it is a high quality picture, I find that it is too boring to be featured. Other people would laugh when they saw that we featured an empty bottle.--[[User:Article and Picture Voter|Article and Picture Voter]] 20:04, 13 August 2008 (UTC) | #While it is a high quality picture, I find that it is too boring to be featured. Other people would laugh when they saw that we featured an empty bottle.--[[User:Article and Picture Voter|Article and Picture Voter]] 20:04, 13 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
#For the above reasons exactly. It's high quality, large, and representative of WW's style, but it's so simple that it's boring. When I think of a featured picture, I think of something that's interesting and captures the essence of a moment, like a big, scary boss that's screaming its head off. So, for me, it's a no.--[[User:Rdnckj258|Rdnckj258]] 18:00, 15 August 2008 (UTC) | #For the above reasons exactly. It's high quality, large, and representative of WW's style, but it's so simple that it's boring. When I think of a featured picture, I think of something that's interesting and captures the essence of a moment, like a big, scary boss that's screaming its head off. So, for me, it's a no.--[[User:Rdnckj258@legacy41958350|Rdnckj258]] 18:00, 15 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
#It's very high quality. It show's wind waker's cartoon touch, but it's just to boring. --[[User:Link hero of light|Link hero of light]] 17:12, 20 August 2008 (UTC) | #It's very high quality. It show's wind waker's cartoon touch, but it's just to boring. --[[User:Link hero of light@legacy41958106|Link hero of light]] 17:12, 20 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
{{clear}} | {{clear}} | ||
}} | }} | ||
Line 243: | Line 243: | ||
| header= [[:File:SSBB Toon Link Model.png|Hidden11.jpg]] — Failed August 31, 2008 | | header= [[:File:SSBB Toon Link Model.png|Hidden11.jpg]] — Failed August 31, 2008 | ||
| content= [[File:SSBB Toon Link Model.png|thumb]] | | content= [[File:SSBB Toon Link Model.png|thumb]] | ||
This picture failed before, but only because it is a spoiler. I think that Super Smash Bros. Brawl has been out long enough and most people have unlocked Toon Link by now.--[[User:Link hero of light|Link hero of light]] 21:52, 23 August 2008 (UTC) | This picture failed before, but only because it is a spoiler. I think that Super Smash Bros. Brawl has been out long enough and most people have unlocked Toon Link by now.--[[User:Link hero of light@legacy41958106|Link hero of light]] 21:52, 23 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
{{Oppose}} | {{Oppose}} | ||
#Sorry, I have to oppose this again. Like I said last time, I find this picture very plain... --[[User:Yuvorias|Felicia's Champion]] 09:07, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | #Sorry, I have to oppose this again. Like I said last time, I find this picture very plain... --[[User:Yuvorias@legacy41958105|Felicia's Champion]] 09:07, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
#There's already a picture of him in the featured image "Link's Piggy Pals". I don't exactly think we need another one. {{:User:Seablue254/sig}} 00:50, 27 August 2008 (UTC) | #There's already a picture of him in the featured image "Link's Piggy Pals". I don't exactly think we need another one. {{:User:Seablue254@legacy41958407/sig}} 00:50, 27 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
#Didn't we already feature a picture of Shiek that was almost exactly the same as this? It would just seem repetative.--[[User:CoreyPotter|Corey Lord of Tacos!]] 13:38, 31 August 2008 (UTC) | #Didn't we already feature a picture of Shiek that was almost exactly the same as this? It would just seem repetative.--[[User:CoreyPotter|Corey Lord of Tacos!]] 13:38, 31 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
{{clear}} | {{clear}} | ||
Line 255: | Line 255: | ||
| header= [[:File:JumpTwilight.jpg|JumpTwilight.jpg]] — Failed September 10, 2008 | | header= [[:File:JumpTwilight.jpg|JumpTwilight.jpg]] — Failed September 10, 2008 | ||
| content= [[File:JumpTwilight.jpg|thumb|200px]] | | content= [[File:JumpTwilight.jpg|thumb|200px]] | ||
In the interest of having at least something available to be voted on, I'm gonna suggest this image. To me, it's a visually interesting and dramatic composition that nicely shows off the graphical aspects of Twilight. {{:User: | In the interest of having at least something available to be voted on, I'm gonna suggest this image. To me, it's a visually interesting and dramatic composition that nicely shows off the graphical aspects of Twilight. {{:User:Adam660@legacy41957735/sig}} 17:20, 6 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
{{Support}} | {{Support}} | ||
#I love it. It shows twilight princess' dark side.--[[User:Link hero of light|Link hero of light]] 19:52, 7 August 2008 (UTC) | #I love it. It shows twilight princess' dark side.--[[User:Link hero of light@legacy41958106|Link hero of light]] 19:52, 7 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
#It's gloomy, it's almost depressing, and it shows the most exciting thing about twilight princess the darkness in hyrule, I LOVE IT!--[[User:Onox13|Onox13]] 21:27, 18 August 2008 (UTC) | #It's gloomy, it's almost depressing, and it shows the most exciting thing about twilight princess the darkness in hyrule, I LOVE IT!--[[User:Onox13|Onox13]] 21:27, 18 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
#It's a very good picture, showing one of the many faces of Twilight Princess. As said above, it's a very dramatic scene and worthy of being featured. --[[User:Emeryn|Emeryn]] 18:54, 26 August 2008 (UTC) | #It's a very good picture, showing one of the many faces of Twilight Princess. As said above, it's a very dramatic scene and worthy of being featured. --[[User:Emeryn|Emeryn]] 18:54, 26 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
Line 265: | Line 265: | ||
#It just doesn't show Twilight Princess' awsomeness. Also it is kind of boring.[[User:CoreyPotter|CoreyPotter]] 20:02, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | #It just doesn't show Twilight Princess' awsomeness. Also it is kind of boring.[[User:CoreyPotter|CoreyPotter]] 20:02, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
#The picture doesn't really say anything about Twilight Princess. It's just too plain. [[User:Angmar|Angmar]] 07:03, 5 September 2008 (UTC)Angmar | #The picture doesn't really say anything about Twilight Princess. It's just too plain. [[User:Angmar|Angmar]] 07:03, 5 September 2008 (UTC)Angmar | ||
#It's a screenshot... and not even a good/rare/interesting one. It isn't featured on a page, not even a gallery or a user page, so that defeats the purpose of even having it here if you ask me. --[[User:Douken|Douken]] 18:39, 10 September 2008 (UTC) | #It's a screenshot... and not even a good/rare/interesting one. It isn't featured on a page, not even a gallery or a user page, so that defeats the purpose of even having it here if you ask me. --[[User:Douken@legacy41958225|Douken]] 18:39, 10 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
{{clear}} | {{clear}} | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{hide | {{hide | ||
| header= [[:File: | | header= [[:File:TP Armogohma Beta.jpg|gohma early.jpg]] — October 3, 2008 | ||
| content= [[File: | | content= [[File:TP Armogohma Beta.jpg|thumb|right]] | ||
this is a beta version of gohma in tp. i love beta pictures but i never see them get featured. so to add some verity i nominate this awesome gohma beta model. imageine how hard it must be to get this stuff!!!![[User:Dragonstetraforce|Dragonstetraforce]] 21:08, 18 September 2008 (UTC) | this is a beta version of gohma in tp. i love beta pictures but i never see them get featured. so to add some verity i nominate this awesome gohma beta model. imageine how hard it must be to get this stuff!!!![[User:Dragonstetraforce@legacy41959011|Dragonstetraforce]] 21:08, 18 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
{{Support}} | {{Support}} | ||
{{Oppose}} | {{Oppose}} | ||
# As much as it is rare and interesting, it's also small and fairly low resolution.--[[User:Rdnckj258|Rdnckj258]] 18:45, 21 September 2008 (UTC) | # As much as it is rare and interesting, it's also small and fairly low resolution.--[[User:Rdnckj258@legacy41958350|Rdnckj258]] 18:45, 21 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
#It's a little blurry too. There are several shots of "Beta TP" like this, so it would seem odd to just feature one anyway. --[[User:Douken|Douken]] 20:33, 21 September 2008 (UTC) | #It's a little blurry too. There are several shots of "Beta TP" like this, so it would seem odd to just feature one anyway. --[[User:Douken@legacy41958225|Douken]] 20:33, 21 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
#Yes, it is interesting. But look at our previous featured images. Now look at this one. There is no comparison. The quality of this is image is far too poor to ever be featured. The quality is so bad, that I highly doubt that either [[User:Steven|Steven]] or myself could improve the quality of this image to acceptable levels. This image also was not given a source.{{:User: | #Yes, it is interesting. But look at our previous featured images. Now look at this one. There is no comparison. The quality of this is image is far too poor to ever be featured. The quality is so bad, that I highly doubt that either [[User:Steven|Steven]] or myself could improve the quality of this image to acceptable levels. This image also was not given a source.{{:User:Emma/sig|~}} <span style="color:#C0C0C0;">00:55, October 3, 2008 (UTC)</span> | ||
{{clear}} | {{clear}} | ||
}} | }} | ||
Line 284: | Line 284: | ||
{{hide | {{hide | ||
| header= [[:File:TP Death Sword Render.png|TP Death Sword Render.png]] ''(proposed replacement for Deathhh.jpg)'' — Failed on October 16, 2008 | | header= [[:File:TP Death Sword Render.png|TP Death Sword Render.png]] ''(proposed replacement for Deathhh.jpg)'' — Failed on October 16, 2008 | ||
| content= [[File:TP Death Sword Render.png|right|thumb|NEW VERSION]][[File: | | content= [[File:TP Death Sword Render.png|right|thumb|NEW VERSION]][[File:TP Death Sword Render 2.png|right|thumb|OLD VERSION]] | ||
This is the miniboss [[Death Sword]]. This a great image, made transparent by [[User:Steven|Steven]]. Awesome work. Much easier to see than the old version that is currently featured.{{:User: | This is the miniboss [[Death Sword]]. This a great image, made transparent by [[User:Steven|Steven]]. Awesome work. Much easier to see than the old version that is currently featured.{{:User:Emma/sig|~}} <span style="color:#C0C0C0;">01:12, October 3, 2008 (UTC)</span> | ||
:<b>{{Big|Important Notice:}}</b> | :<b>{{Big|Important Notice:}}</b> | ||
::This nomination is an experiment in a new policy. It is intended as a replacement for the existing image [[:File: | ::This nomination is an experiment in a new policy. It is intended as a replacement for the existing image [[:File:TP Death Sword Render 2.png|Deathhh.jpg]]. If this image is voted in, the old one will automatically be disqualified and the new one will replace it on every single page that the old one was on, save for this one. | ||
'''ALSO NOTE:'''<br> | '''ALSO NOTE:'''<br/> | ||
The subject of this image is black. The old background is black. This image has '''NO BACKGROUND!!!!!!!'''. It is transparent. The page background is normal blue. So in no way is this harder to see than the old one. It is a physical impossibility. The contrast is greater for the new one. The ease of seeing it is due to contrast.<br> | The subject of this image is black. The old background is black. This image has '''NO BACKGROUND!!!!!!!'''. It is transparent. The page background is normal blue. So in no way is this harder to see than the old one. It is a physical impossibility. The contrast is greater for the new one. The ease of seeing it is due to contrast.<br/> | ||
To clarify this, go [http://zeldawiki.org/images/3/3d/TP Death Sword Render.png here]. | To clarify this, go [http://zeldawiki.org/images/3/3d/TP Death Sword Render.png here]. | ||
Line 297: | Line 297: | ||
{{Oppose}} | {{Oppose}} | ||
#You can't see it as good without the background.--[[User:Article and Picture Voter|Article and Picture Voter]] 01:19, 6 October 2008 (UTC) | #You can't see it as good without the background.--[[User:Article and Picture Voter|Article and Picture Voter]] 01:19, 6 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
#The background on the old picture was half the reason I liked the old picture. With this one, half the reason I liked it is gone. That's why my vote is here, and not in "support". --[[User:Yuvorias|Felicia's Champion]] 09:24, 6 October 2008 (UTC) | #The background on the old picture was half the reason I liked the old picture. With this one, half the reason I liked it is gone. That's why my vote is here, and not in "support". --[[User:Yuvorias@legacy41958105|Felicia's Champion]] 09:24, 6 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
#a trasparent charater on no background is inpossible to see.[[User:Dragonstetraforce|Dragonstetraforce]] 20:37, 8 October 2008 (UTC) | #a trasparent charater on no background is inpossible to see.[[User:Dragonstetraforce@legacy41959011|Dragonstetraforce]] 20:37, 8 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
#It just isn't the same without the background. Also, it is very hard to see and a featured picture should be easy to see.--[[User:Link hero of light|Link hero of light]] 18:54, 12 October 2008 (UTC) | #It just isn't the same without the background. Also, it is very hard to see and a featured picture should be easy to see.--[[User:Link hero of light@legacy41958106|Link hero of light]] 18:54, 12 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
#I have to say, regardless of issues such as clarity or contrast, my problem with the new image is the lack of background. Yes, it was fairly plain, but it wasn't just black. See the purple bit? That cleverly adds both interest and atmosphere to an otherwise slightly plain image. As a (slightly exaggerated) analogy, imagine a film such as The Matrix, shot almost entirely against green-screen. Should they have released that film with just the actors jumping around in front of a green backdrop, instead of adding the CG environments? {{:User: | #I have to say, regardless of issues such as clarity or contrast, my problem with the new image is the lack of background. Yes, it was fairly plain, but it wasn't just black. See the purple bit? That cleverly adds both interest and atmosphere to an otherwise slightly plain image. As a (slightly exaggerated) analogy, imagine a film such as The Matrix, shot almost entirely against green-screen. Should they have released that film with just the actors jumping around in front of a green backdrop, instead of adding the CG environments? {{:User:Adam660@legacy41957735/sig}} 05:59, 16 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
#To me, the background of the old version and the bluish glow added to some of the spookyness that Death Sword has.--[[User:bolter1|bolter1]] | #To me, the background of the old version and the bluish glow added to some of the spookyness that Death Sword has.--[[User:bolter1|bolter1]] | ||
{{Clear}} | {{Clear}} | ||
Line 311: | Line 311: | ||
{{Support}} | {{Support}} | ||
#A very interesting nomination! I have to agree, I would like to see this featured. Thus far, we have no pictures depicting Deku Scrubs primarially, and the only picture that does feature one is Deku Link, hiding in the background for the MM picture. So, first vote! --[[User:Yuvorias|Felicia's Champion]] 23:57, 6 September 2008 (UTC) | #A very interesting nomination! I have to agree, I would like to see this featured. Thus far, we have no pictures depicting Deku Scrubs primarially, and the only picture that does feature one is Deku Link, hiding in the background for the MM picture. So, first vote! --[[User:Yuvorias@legacy41958105|Felicia's Champion]] 23:57, 6 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
#Great nomination! I've always liked these characters and this image, and with a some work by Steven and myself, it's now of the best quality possible! {{:User: | #Great nomination! I've always liked these characters and this image, and with a some work by Steven and myself, it's now of the best quality possible! {{:User:Adam660@legacy41957735/sig}} 11:30, 21 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
#I've always loved this image. It's about time it got nominated. {{:User:Twili_Goddess/sig}} | #I've always loved this image. It's about time it got nominated. {{:User:Twili_Goddess/sig}} | ||
# Deku Scrubs have always been cool in my book and Majora's Mask really did good for them, giving them a castle and royal family and even letting you play as one, so this gets my vote --[[User:Kresh64|Kresh64]] 19:06, 3 October 2008 (UTC) | # Deku Scrubs have always been cool in my book and Majora's Mask really did good for them, giving them a castle and royal family and even letting you play as one, so this gets my vote --[[User:Kresh64|Kresh64]] 19:06, 3 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
Line 319: | Line 319: | ||
{{Oppose}} | {{Oppose}} | ||
#I don't really see what is so impressive about this image. It is rather bland and not particularly interesting. It doesn't really stand out among the vast number of images on this site. It is no more interesting than most others. Too simple to be featured.{{:User: | #I don't really see what is so impressive about this image. It is rather bland and not particularly interesting. It doesn't really stand out among the vast number of images on this site. It is no more interesting than most others. Too simple to be featured.{{:User:Emma/sig|~}} <span style="color:#C0C0C0;">03:17, September 27, 2008 (UTC)</span> | ||
#This picture does show anything particuarly interesting. It does not show you you something important. The image leaves something to be desired, and is also simple to the point where the larger portion of the pictures on this web address are more interesting. the flaws are too great for it to be featured.[[User:Kingbulbin|Kingbulbin]] 11:41, 30 September 2008 (UTC) | #This picture does show anything particuarly interesting. It does not show you you something important. The image leaves something to be desired, and is also simple to the point where the larger portion of the pictures on this web address are more interesting. the flaws are too great for it to be featured.[[User:Kingbulbin|Kingbulbin]] 11:41, 30 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
#I find this picture to be very bland. Its color is not good. It shouldnt be featured--[[User: | #I find this picture to be very bland. Its color is not good. It shouldnt be featured--[[User:Lt. Hammerspace@legacy41959211|HeroOfTime6]] 13:28, 11 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
{{clear}} | {{clear}} | ||
Line 330: | Line 330: | ||
| content= | | content= | ||
[[File:LA Great Hyrulean Sea Storm Artwork.png|thumb|500px|right|Link in the stormy waters of the Great Sea just prior to {{LA}}.]] | [[File:LA Great Hyrulean Sea Storm Artwork.png|thumb|500px|right|Link in the stormy waters of the Great Sea just prior to {{LA}}.]] | ||
There is only one other image of Link's Awakening featured. That one is small and doesn't actually have a moment from the game. This one does. It is of Link struggling to keep his boat afloat as seen in the game's opening. This image came from the Nintendo Guide for the game. It was monochrome, except for the lamp glow. I colored it based on the colors of those objects in the game. It took a lot of work to fix up this image. It looks good and it was worked into the {{LA|-}} page very well. There is a lot of drama in the image. Good to feature.{{:User: | There is only one other image of Link's Awakening featured. That one is small and doesn't actually have a moment from the game. This one does. It is of Link struggling to keep his boat afloat as seen in the game's opening. This image came from the Nintendo Guide for the game. It was monochrome, except for the lamp glow. I colored it based on the colors of those objects in the game. It took a lot of work to fix up this image. It looks good and it was worked into the {{LA|-}} page very well. There is a lot of drama in the image. Good to feature.{{:User:Emma/sig|~}} <span style="color:#C0C0C0;">07:28, October 19, 2008 (UTC)</span> | ||
{{Support}} | {{Support}} | ||
#. I would support this because it's interesting, nice colors, lot of drama. It's unique because of the action being portrayed, a good image. Aye, I'm in favor[[User:Mandi|The Sage of Cosmos]] 13:01, 29 October 2008 (UTC) | #. I would support this because it's interesting, nice colors, lot of drama. It's unique because of the action being portrayed, a good image. Aye, I'm in favor[[User:Mandi|The Sage of Cosmos]] 13:01, 29 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
#I'm supporting this. You can really tell that a lot of work has gone into this picture. --[[User:HylianWannabe|HylianWannabe]] 13:01, 7 November 2008(UTC) | #I'm supporting this. You can really tell that a lot of work has gone into this picture. --[[User:HylianWannabe|HylianWannabe]] 13:01, 7 November 2008(UTC) | ||
# I want this picture to be featured because its very unique, and because we dont have alot of art like this featured. Its a very good and well done picture and deserves to be featured. --[[User:Kresh64|Kresh64]] 21:08, 14 November 2008 (UTC) | # I want this picture to be featured because its very unique, and because we dont have alot of art like this featured. Its a very good and well done picture and deserves to be featured. --[[User:Kresh64|Kresh64]] 21:08, 14 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
# This picture's great. Link's struggle, trying to hang on for dear life really sets the mood for not only the picture, but the whole game as well. I also agree with Kresh, we definitely need some more official artwork.{{:User:Steven2113/sig}} 19:44, 16 November 2008 (UTC) | # This picture's great. Link's struggle, trying to hang on for dear life really sets the mood for not only the picture, but the whole game as well. I also agree with Kresh, we definitely need some more official artwork.{{:User:Steven2113@legacy41958623/sig}} 19:44, 16 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
{{Oppose}} | {{Oppose}} | ||
#I oppose this because when i look at it i can't make out what it is, its just not interesting.[[User: | #I oppose this because when i look at it i can't make out what it is, its just not interesting.[[User:Lt. Hammerspace@legacy41959211|HeroOfTime6]] 10:05, 1 November 2008 | ||
#<s>I had to click on the picture to see what it actually was. I thought the lantern was Navi. My interest is also not sparked. --[[User:HeroOfTheWinds10|HeroOfTheWinds10]] 19:50, 7 November 2008 (UTC)</s> | #<s>I had to click on the picture to see what it actually was. I thought the lantern was Navi. My interest is also not sparked. --[[User:HeroOfTheWinds10@legacy41959235|HeroOfTheWinds10]] 19:50, 7 November 2008 (UTC)</s> | ||
#*Vote nullified by a consensus of three. | #*Vote nullified by a consensus of three. | ||
#<s>This picture would have been cooler in monochrome, also this picture doesn't have Link's face and his face is pretty.--[[User:ILoVeSaSuSkE|ILoVeSaSuSkE]] 19:30, 10 November 2008 (UTC)</s> | #<s>This picture would have been cooler in monochrome, also this picture doesn't have Link's face and his face is pretty.--[[User:ILoVeSaSuSkE|ILoVeSaSuSkE]] 19:30, 10 November 2008 (UTC)</s> | ||
#*Vote nullified by a consensus of three. | #*Vote nullified by a consensus of three. | ||
#You can barely tell that it's Link on the boat and it's too difficult to tell what going on. Makes me dizy.--[[User:Article and Picture Voter|Article and Picture Voter]] 01:43, 16 November 2008 (UTC) | #You can barely tell that it's Link on the boat and it's too difficult to tell what going on. Makes me dizy.--[[User:Article and Picture Voter|Article and Picture Voter]] 01:43, 16 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
#Though I sympathize with the effort, I don't believe this should be featured. (A) When zooming in, parts of it are actually very blurry--especially around Link and parts of the waves, (B) frankly I just don't find it that well-drawn, especially compared with other official Zelda art, (C) least important of my reasons: though it was just the coloring, this is inevitably makes me think "fanart", which drives me away from it being featured. --[[User:Douken|Douken]] 05:14, 17 November 2008 (UTC) | #Though I sympathize with the effort, I don't believe this should be featured. (A) When zooming in, parts of it are actually very blurry--especially around Link and parts of the waves, (B) frankly I just don't find it that well-drawn, especially compared with other official Zelda art, (C) least important of my reasons: though it was just the coloring, this is inevitably makes me think "fanart", which drives me away from it being featured. --[[User:Douken@legacy41958225|Douken]] 05:14, 17 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
<big><b>Comments</b></big> | <big><b>Comments</b></big> | ||
{{hide | {{hide | ||
| header= First contest | | header= First contest | ||
| content= | | content= | ||
*I'd just like to point out that complaining about a thumbnail is not a good thing to do. It says nothing about the image. If any other two people agree with me we'll cancel out these votes.{{:User: | *I'd just like to point out that complaining about a thumbnail is not a good thing to do. It says nothing about the image. If any other two people agree with me we'll cancel out these votes.{{:User:Emma/sig|~}} <span style="color:#C0C0C0;">19:56, November 7, 2008 (UTC)</span> | ||
**Remember, you're voting on the image, not the image's thumbnail! ;) {{:User:Ando1400/sig}} 21:20, 7 November 2008 (UTC) | **Remember, you're voting on the image, not the image's thumbnail! ;) {{:User:Ando1400@legacy41958204/sig}} 21:20, 7 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
*You seem to have this thing where when somebody votes against something you have nominated or support, those votes are invalid. HeroOfTime6 said that the picture is not interesting and he couldn't really make out what is is. I don't see how that vote could be invalid. Also, HeroOfTheWinds10 opposed not only because of thumbnail, he also said it was not interesting. Both those votes seem valid to me.--[[User:Link hero of light|Link hero of light]] 00:00, 8 November 2008 (UTC) | *You seem to have this thing where when somebody votes against something you have nominated or support, those votes are invalid. HeroOfTime6 said that the picture is not interesting and he couldn't really make out what is is. I don't see how that vote could be invalid. Also, HeroOfTheWinds10 opposed not only because of thumbnail, he also said it was not interesting. Both those votes seem valid to me.--[[User:Link hero of light@legacy41958106|Link hero of light]] 00:00, 8 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
* I don't believe anyone said that the said votes were invalid. But you can't judge from just looking at the thumbnail. I actually thought the image was interesting.[[User:Mandi|The Sage of Cosmos]] 00:08, 8 November 2008 (UTC) | * I don't believe anyone said that the said votes were invalid. But you can't judge from just looking at the thumbnail. I actually thought the image was interesting.[[User:Mandi|The Sage of Cosmos]] 00:08, 8 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
**That is a coincidence. They voted on the thumbnail not the image. That makes them invalid. End of story. (The image was displayed a lot smaller than this when they voted.){{:User: | **That is a coincidence. They voted on the thumbnail not the image. That makes them invalid. End of story. (The image was displayed a lot smaller than this when they voted.){{:User:Emma/sig|~}} <span style="color:#C0C0C0;">00:10, November 8, 2008 (UTC)</span> | ||
***On a side note, those other votes '''WERE''' invalid. I would have done the same thing regardless of whether or not I supported the image. We just didn't have this process of invalidating them yet.{{:User: | ***On a side note, those other votes '''WERE''' invalid. I would have done the same thing regardless of whether or not I supported the image. We just didn't have this process of invalidating them yet.{{:User:Emma/sig|~}} <span style="color:#C0C0C0;">00:14, November 8, 2008 (UTC)</span> | ||
Matt, you don't seem to get what I'm trying to tell you, the thumbnai wasn't the only thing HeroOfTheWinds10 voted on. And HeroOfTime6 didn't mention anything about the size. However the picture ''is'' quite interesting, if it wasn't so topsy-turvey it would have my vote.--[[User:Link hero of light|Link hero of light]] 00:16, 8 November 2008 (UTC) | Matt, you don't seem to get what I'm trying to tell you, the thumbnai wasn't the only thing HeroOfTheWinds10 voted on. And HeroOfTime6 didn't mention anything about the size. However the picture ''is'' quite interesting, if it wasn't so topsy-turvey it would have my vote.--[[User:Link hero of light@legacy41958106|Link hero of light]] 00:16, 8 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
*"''when i look at it i can't make out what it is''" He can't make it out because it was a small thumbnail. The votes are invalid. It was a beginner's mistake. Also, if they can't make out the thumbnail, then of course they won't think that it is interesting. The two go together. Let me remind you that Ando and I are in agreement on this issue. He's away at the moment. But he'll be back in a few hours.{{:User: | *"''when i look at it i can't make out what it is''" He can't make it out because it was a small thumbnail. The votes are invalid. It was a beginner's mistake. Also, if they can't make out the thumbnail, then of course they won't think that it is interesting. The two go together. Let me remind you that Ando and I are in agreement on this issue. He's away at the moment. But he'll be back in a few hours.{{:User:Emma/sig|~}} <span style="color:#C0C0C0;">00:25, November 8, 2008 (UTC)</span> | ||
*You know what, we could just go back and forth, both of have said our parts and now it's up for a sysop to decide. When Ando get's back he can decide whether those vote are invalid or not. If he says they are, I'll admit defeat in this debate.--[[User:Link hero of light|Link hero of light]] 00:37, 8 November 2008 (UTC) | *You know what, we could just go back and forth, both of have said our parts and now it's up for a sysop to decide. When Ando get's back he can decide whether those vote are invalid or not. If he says they are, I'll admit defeat in this debate.--[[User:Link hero of light@legacy41958106|Link hero of light]] 00:37, 8 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
{{Clear}} | {{Clear}} | ||
* I understand now. I believe I '''misunderstood''' along the line here. From reading the above comments, I'm gonna have to agree with Ando and Matt on this. Add to the record you have third party joining your agrement ;) [[User:Mandi|The Sage of Cosmos]] 01:30, 8 November 2008 (UTC) | * I understand now. I believe I '''misunderstood''' along the line here. From reading the above comments, I'm gonna have to agree with Ando and Matt on this. Add to the record you have third party joining your agrement ;) [[User:Mandi|The Sage of Cosmos]] 01:30, 8 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
*Okay then. But we'll still wait for Ando. He and I need to discuss how to go about this.{{:User: | *Okay then. But we'll still wait for Ando. He and I need to discuss how to go about this.{{:User:Emma/sig|~}} <span style="color:#C0C0C0;">01:38, November 8, 2008 (UTC)</span> | ||
*<small> "He and you"? Don't you mean Ando, Matt and LHOL need to discuss how to go about it :P.</small>--[[User:Link hero of light|Link hero of light]] 01:44, 8 November 2008 (UTC) | *<small> "He and you"? Don't you mean Ando, Matt and LHOL need to discuss how to go about it :P.</small>--[[User:Link hero of light@legacy41958106|Link hero of light]] 01:44, 8 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
*Not this case. I mean we have to talk of the mechanics of how this process is going to work now and in every future case. This matter is already decided so Ando and I don't have to talk about that part. Basically I'm thinking that we need a template and update the rule listing above. This whole process was already agreed upon. We just have to work out how to do it.{{:User: | *Not this case. I mean we have to talk of the mechanics of how this process is going to work now and in every future case. This matter is already decided so Ando and I don't have to talk about that part. Basically I'm thinking that we need a template and update the rule listing above. This whole process was already agreed upon. We just have to work out how to do it.{{:User:Emma/sig|~}} <span style="color:#C0C0C0;">01:59, November 8, 2008 (UTC)</span> | ||
*Did you call Ando or E-mail him? I figured you must have some means of comunnication with him since you knew he was going to be gone.--[[User:Link hero of light|Link hero of light]] 04:09, 8 November 2008 (UTC) | *Did you call Ando or E-mail him? I figured you must have some means of comunnication with him since you knew he was going to be gone.--[[User:Link hero of light@legacy41958106|Link hero of light]] 04:09, 8 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
**One, [[User: | **One, [[User:Ando1400@legacy41958204#Contact Info|check this, LHOL]]. Two, if they find the image uninteresting, well, that's their opinion, and given that featured picture nominees are decided almost solely on personal preference of the image, that's okay. However, saying "I can't make out what this is unless I look at it in full view" isn't right: you're voting on the image, not on the thumbnail. If you don't like the full image, that's fine! You're entitled to that opinion. But stating that you don't like the thumbnail is not a valid reason to oppose the image's nomination. {{:User:Ando1400@legacy41958204/sig}} 04:45, 8 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
*Okay. I know that it was a beginner's mistake to complain about the thumbnail. But I did also mention that I was not very interested in the picture.--[[User:HeroOfTheWinds10|HeroOfTheWinds10]] 21:37, 9 November 2008 (UTC) | *Okay. I know that it was a beginner's mistake to complain about the thumbnail. But I did also mention that I was not very interested in the picture.--[[User:HeroOfTheWinds10@legacy41959235|HeroOfTheWinds10]] 21:37, 9 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
**Noted, but we have had a consensus of three. The vote is out. Sorry. The point is that you've learned from your mistake.{{:User: | **Noted, but we have had a consensus of three. The vote is out. Sorry. The point is that you've learned from your mistake.{{:User:Emma/sig|~}} <span style="color:#C0C0C0;">21:34, November 14, 2008 (UTC)</span> | ||
*I said i couldnt make out what it was because its so swirly and not interesting but lets put all this uglyness behind us.--[[User: | *I said i couldnt make out what it was because its so swirly and not interesting but lets put all this uglyness behind us.--[[User:Lt. Hammerspace@legacy41959211|HeroOfTime6]] 21:59, 9 November 2008 (UTC)about to be capsized! That is too interesting by anyone's standards.{{:User:Emma/sig|~}} | ||
**Swirly? He's caught it a wave. The part behind the sail is sky. Not innteresting? He is <span style="color:#C0C0C0;">21:34, November 14, 2008 (UTC)</span> | **Swirly? He's caught it a wave. The part behind the sail is sky. Not innteresting? He is <span style="color:#C0C0C0;">21:34, November 14, 2008 (UTC)</span> | ||
*Well not my standards it makes me seasick HAHAHA, oh well I don't know what else to say. And that monocrome thing is just that guy being a NOOb.--[[User: | *Well not my standards it makes me seasick HAHAHA, oh well I don't know what else to say. And that monocrome thing is just that guy being a NOOb.--[[User:Lt. Hammerspace@legacy41959211|HeroOfTime6]] 22:19, 14 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
**So what does your seasickness have to do with the quality of this image?{{:User: | **So what does your seasickness have to do with the quality of this image?{{:User:Emma/sig|~}} <span style="color:#C0C0C0;">22:52, November 14, 2008 (UTC)</span> | ||
*Oh...I was just kidding. But in all seriousness i just don't care for the image.--[[User: | *Oh...I was just kidding. But in all seriousness i just don't care for the image.--[[User:Lt. Hammerspace@legacy41959211|HeroOfTime6]] 01:54, 15 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
}} | }} | ||
---- | ---- | ||
*Can we really count the third vote? Monocrome? No one would ever let a monocrome one be featured. Besides the original version from the book wasn't monocrome. Also, not showing Link's face because his face is pretty? I didn't draw this! We'd never let fan art be featured. This isn't a matter of whether Link's face is pretty or not! I think that this vote should be nullified too.{{:User: | *Can we really count the third vote? Monocrome? No one would ever let a monocrome one be featured. Besides the original version from the book wasn't monocrome. Also, not showing Link's face because his face is pretty? I didn't draw this! We'd never let fan art be featured. This isn't a matter of whether Link's face is pretty or not! I think that this vote should be nullified too.{{:User:Emma/sig|~}} <span style="color:#C0C0C0;">21:34, November 14, 2008 (UTC)</span> | ||
*Get rid of that Links face is pretty vote thats just crazy, it makes us look unprofessional.--[[User: | *Get rid of that Links face is pretty vote thats just crazy, it makes us look unprofessional.--[[User:Lt. Hammerspace@legacy41959211|HeroOfTime6]] 22:23, 14 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
---- | ---- | ||
*This is getting old. Anyone who has actually played the games can tell it is Link. It is a wave: a six year old could tell you that. The Article and Picture Voter one has to go too.{{:User: | *This is getting old. Anyone who has actually played the games can tell it is Link. It is a wave: a six year old could tell you that. The Article and Picture Voter one has to go too.{{:User:Emma/sig|~}} <span style="color:#C0C0C0;">01:54, November 16, 2008 (UTC)</span> | ||
**Plus I think that Article and Picture Voter's policy of jumping on the wiki just to vote is abuse of a Zelda Wiki account. If it were only up to me, (s)he would be blocked indefinitely from editing.{{:User: | **Plus I think that Article and Picture Voter's policy of jumping on the wiki just to vote is abuse of a Zelda Wiki account. If it were only up to me, (s)he would be blocked indefinitely from editing.{{:User:Emma/sig|~}} <span style="color:#C0C0C0;">02:06, November 16, 2008 (UTC)</span> | ||
* It seems to me that some people have been pretty thick in making sure that this image is disqualified. We have reasons like: "I can't see Link's face, and his face is pretty" "It makes me seasick." What the....heck.....is this? I realize everyone has to have an opinion, else the world would be a sad place, but this is ridiculous. I can see the image crystal clear. There is nothing that I'm unsure of. {{:User: | * It seems to me that some people have been pretty thick in making sure that this image is disqualified. We have reasons like: "I can't see Link's face, and his face is pretty" "It makes me seasick." What the....heck.....is this? I realize everyone has to have an opinion, else the world would be a sad place, but this is ridiculous. I can see the image crystal clear. There is nothing that I'm unsure of. {{:User:Mandi2517@legacy41958928/sig}} 03:03, 16 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
Fortunately, it is not up to you to decide. My little sister is too young to make any real edits so I thought see could just vote. Also, if you had looked through her contributions, you would have seen that voting is not the only thing she had done. I thought/hoped you were done accusing people's opposing votes. Apparently, I was wrong :(.--[[User:Link hero of light|Link hero of light]] 02:45, 16 November 2008 (UTC) | Fortunately, it is not up to you to decide. My little sister is too young to make any real edits so I thought see could just vote. Also, if you had looked through her contributions, you would have seen that voting is not the only thing she had done. I thought/hoped you were done accusing people's opposing votes. Apparently, I was wrong :(.--[[User:Link hero of light@legacy41958106|Link hero of light]] 02:45, 16 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
*The world isn't fair. Sadly, if she can't do anything but vote, then she'll have to wait until she can do other things. Because voting on things is not what this Wiki is about. It is about trying to contain all the knowledge in the Zelda universe. Featured articles and pictures are a way to motivate improvement. So unless the person is making valid edits, they should not vote. Because only people that know the ins and outs of the wiki can know what is truly acceptable. It is that simple. We are not voting on how we'd feel in the situation that the pictures depict. Even though you're most likely telling the truth, we technically have no proof that it is your sister and not you. That is why it is best not to run two accounts from the same household. If you guys did that on Wikipedia, you'd likely be blocked right off. There is a reason that many countries have a minimum voting age. We also cannot be sure if you are not influencing her votes. I can't make exceptions. That's the way the world works.{{:User: | *The world isn't fair. Sadly, if she can't do anything but vote, then she'll have to wait until she can do other things. Because voting on things is not what this Wiki is about. It is about trying to contain all the knowledge in the Zelda universe. Featured articles and pictures are a way to motivate improvement. So unless the person is making valid edits, they should not vote. Because only people that know the ins and outs of the wiki can know what is truly acceptable. It is that simple. We are not voting on how we'd feel in the situation that the pictures depict. Even though you're most likely telling the truth, we technically have no proof that it is your sister and not you. That is why it is best not to run two accounts from the same household. If you guys did that on Wikipedia, you'd likely be blocked right off. There is a reason that many countries have a minimum voting age. We also cannot be sure if you are not influencing her votes. I can't make exceptions. That's the way the world works.{{:User:Emma/sig|~}} <span style="color:#C0C0C0;">03:14, November 16, 2008 (UTC)</span> | ||
**We're going to set up guidelines for voting. From what we have so far, this would fall under what isn't acceptable. So it wouldn't matter who's nomination it is. It could be against something I voted against. If someone votes like that, I still have to oppose it. It is that simple. I've told you that multiple times and you still can't understand that.{{:User: | **We're going to set up guidelines for voting. From what we have so far, this would fall under what isn't acceptable. So it wouldn't matter who's nomination it is. It could be against something I voted against. If someone votes like that, I still have to oppose it. It is that simple. I've told you that multiple times and you still can't understand that.{{:User:Emma/sig|~}} <span style="color:#C0C0C0;">03:17, November 16, 2008 (UTC)</span> | ||
***I'm also afraid that <span class="plainlinks">[http://www.zeldawiki.org/index.php?title=Special%3AEditCount&target=Article+and+Picture+Voter&doeditcount=Show+count three main namespace edits]</span> doesn't really count for doing something other than voting.{{:User: | ***I'm also afraid that <span class="plainlinks">[http://www.zeldawiki.org/index.php?title=Special%3AEditCount&target=Article+and+Picture+Voter&doeditcount=Show+count three main namespace edits]</span> doesn't really count for doing something other than voting.{{:User:Emma/sig|~}} <span style="color:#C0C0C0;">03:25, November 16, 2008 (UTC)</span> | ||
**Edit conflicts combined with "Internet explorer cannot display the webpage" WOO HOO! Fun times!! But, that's nobodys fault so I'll shut up :P Guidelines, yes! We need them, that is the only way we will get anythin accomplished in a case like this. {{:User: | **Edit conflicts combined with "Internet explorer cannot display the webpage" WOO HOO! Fun times!! But, that's nobodys fault so I'll shut up :P Guidelines, yes! We need them, that is the only way we will get anythin accomplished in a case like this. {{:User:Mandi2517@legacy41958928/sig}} 03:39, 16 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
You're exactly right, the world isn't fair. So why don't you stop trying to make people's votes invalid. However, '''if''' no one agrees with me, I'm willing to make a compromise. My sister can vote on my account, we can take turns each month. Considering I'm coming out worse on this compromise, you should be happy.--[[User:Link hero of light|Link hero of light]] 05:08, 16 November 2008 (UTC) | You're exactly right, the world isn't fair. So why don't you stop trying to make people's votes invalid. However, '''if''' no one agrees with me, I'm willing to make a compromise. My sister can vote on my account, we can take turns each month. Considering I'm coming out worse on this compromise, you should be happy.--[[User:Link hero of light@legacy41958106|Link hero of light]] 05:08, 16 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
*I won't stop. They are invalid. It is that simple. <b><big><u>I don't want to have to say this again:</u></big></b> It doesn't matter who's nomination it is or how I feel about it. If the votes are irrational or are not about the quality of the image or article itself, we will invalidate them. Once the guidelines are up, there will be no more arguing on that point.{{:User: | *I won't stop. They are invalid. It is that simple. <b><big><u>I don't want to have to say this again:</u></big></b> It doesn't matter who's nomination it is or how I feel about it. If the votes are irrational or are not about the quality of the image or article itself, we will invalidate them. Once the guidelines are up, there will be no more arguing on that point.{{:User:Emma/sig|~}} <span style="color:#C0C0C0;">05:14, November 16, 2008 (UTC)</span> | ||
''But'' it was about the quality of the image. "You can barely tell that it's Link on the boat and it's too difficult to tell what going on.". If that isn't complaining about the quality of the image than what is? Please tell me exactly what it is.--[[User:Link hero of light|Link hero of light]] 05:30, 16 November 2008 (UTC) | ''But'' it was about the quality of the image. "You can barely tell that it's Link on the boat and it's too difficult to tell what going on.". If that isn't complaining about the quality of the image than what is? Please tell me exactly what it is.--[[User:Link hero of light@legacy41958106|Link hero of light]] 05:30, 16 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
*For now it's just my opinion. But don't worry. Once the guideline's are up, I'll stick by them. Even if I still think something is not right. This system now is shaky. So wait until then.{{:User: | *For now it's just my opinion. But don't worry. Once the guideline's are up, I'll stick by them. Even if I still think something is not right. This system now is shaky. So wait until then.{{:User:Emma/sig|~}} <span style="color:#C0C0C0;">05:41, November 16, 2008 (UTC)</span> | ||
And so will I. One thing I want to ask you is can you show me what the oringinal picture looked like?--[[User:Link hero of light|Link hero of light]] 00:48, 17 November 2008 (UTC) | And so will I. One thing I want to ask you is can you show me what the oringinal picture looked like?--[[User:Link hero of light@legacy41958106|Link hero of light]] 00:48, 17 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
These votes are opinions of why people think pictures should or should not be featured. If your own opinion conflicts with the opinion of someone else... does that mean they're wrong? If someone feels strongly enough about a reason to deny an image to be featured they should at least be given a chance to have their votes counted. It isn't like people are trying to hurt the website by voting against an image. They are just trying to help it by giving a certain reason why they think it shouldn't be featured. (I understand that my vote was with '''good reason''' denied)--[[User:HeroOfTheWinds10|HeroOfTheWinds10]] 04:27, 17 November 2008 (UTC) | These votes are opinions of why people think pictures should or should not be featured. If your own opinion conflicts with the opinion of someone else... does that mean they're wrong? If someone feels strongly enough about a reason to deny an image to be featured they should at least be given a chance to have their votes counted. It isn't like people are trying to hurt the website by voting against an image. They are just trying to help it by giving a certain reason why they think it shouldn't be featured. (I understand that my vote was with '''good reason''' denied)--[[User:HeroOfTheWinds10@legacy41959235|HeroOfTheWinds10]] 04:27, 17 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
:That is what the guidelines will be for. Right now it is basically hit-or-miss. So it'll be messy until then. Once they're up, things will be much better for everyone. And it will making voting easier too.{{:User: | :That is what the guidelines will be for. Right now it is basically hit-or-miss. So it'll be messy until then. Once they're up, things will be much better for everyone. And it will making voting easier too.{{:User:Emma/sig|~}} <span style="color:#C0C0C0;">04:38, November 17, 2008 (UTC)</span> | ||
}} | }} | ||
Line 409: | Line 409: | ||
| header= [[:File:PH Scene 1-2.png|PH Scene 1-2.png]]/[[:File:Ph scene 1b.jpg|Ph scene 1b.jpg]] — Failed on November 18, 2008 | | header= [[:File:PH Scene 1-2.png|PH Scene 1-2.png]]/[[:File:Ph scene 1b.jpg|Ph scene 1b.jpg]] — Failed on November 18, 2008 | ||
| content= | | content= | ||
I think we definitely need a featured image from the most recent game in the series, and I really like this one. Having said that, I couldn't decide which version to choose, so I've decided to leave the decision up to you! When voting in support, please start votes with '''A:''' or '''B:''' to indicate your preference. {{:User: | I think we definitely need a featured image from the most recent game in the series, and I really like this one. Having said that, I couldn't decide which version to choose, so I've decided to leave the decision up to you! When voting in support, please start votes with '''A:''' or '''B:''' to indicate your preference. {{:User:Adam660@legacy41957735/sig}} 18:09, 7 August 2008 (UTC)<br/><br/><br/><br/><br/><br/> | ||
[[File:PH Scene 1-2.png|thumb|right|200px|<center><b>Option A</b></center>]] | [[File:PH Scene 1-2.png|thumb|right|200px|<center><b>Option A</b></center>]] | ||
[[File:Ph scene 1b.jpg|thumb|right|200px|<center><b>Option B</b></center>]] | [[File:Ph scene 1b.jpg|thumb|right|200px|<center><b>Option B</b></center>]] | ||
{{Support}} | {{Support}} | ||
#'''A'''. I think it's a pretty cool picture and there hasn't been too many featured PH nominations yet![[User:ZeldaGirl96|ZeldaGirl96]] 20:06, 8 August 2008 (UTC) | #'''A'''. I think it's a pretty cool picture and there hasn't been too many featured PH nominations yet![[User:ZeldaGirl96@legacy41958649|ZeldaGirl96]] 20:06, 8 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
#'''A:''' I gotta admit, I like this image a lot. {{:User:Ando1400/sig}} 21:27, 11 August 2008 (UTC) | #'''A:''' I gotta admit, I like this image a lot. {{:User:Ando1400@legacy41958204/sig}} 21:27, 11 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
#I love option '''A''', its faded borders zooming in on the main characters is simply epic. {{:User:Steven2113/sig}} 17:30, 16 August 2008 (EST) | #I love option '''A''', its faded borders zooming in on the main characters is simply epic. {{:User:Steven2113@legacy41958623/sig}} 17:30, 16 August 2008 (EST) | ||
# '''A''', I have only played Phantom Hourglass at Best Buy but I think we need a picture from the most recennt game. I also appreciate that Link's shield has the crayfish/lobster on it like his pajamas in Wind Waker.[[User:CoreyPotter|CoreyPotter]] 19:58, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | # '''A''', I have only played Phantom Hourglass at Best Buy but I think we need a picture from the most recennt game. I also appreciate that Link's shield has the crayfish/lobster on it like his pajamas in Wind Waker.[[User:CoreyPotter|CoreyPotter]] 19:58, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
#Option '''B''' would be a good picture to display. The cover of PH is quite nice, giving a good first impression of what to expect of the game. [[User:Angmar|Angmar]] 07:10, 29 August 2008 (UTC) | #Option '''B''' would be a good picture to display. The cover of PH is quite nice, giving a good first impression of what to expect of the game. [[User:Angmar|Angmar]] 07:10, 29 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
#Option '''A''' is really awesome. I was gonna accept with Angmar but then again out of five people only one person chose for the other picture (sorry [[User:Angmar|Angmar]]). That is why I checked ''Option A'' and it did look much better. That is why I vote for Option A. [[User:Akki|Akki]] 18:05, 6 September 2008 (UTC) | #Option '''A''' is really awesome. I was gonna accept with Angmar but then again out of five people only one person chose for the other picture (sorry [[User:Angmar|Angmar]]). That is why I checked ''Option A'' and it did look much better. That is why I vote for Option A. [[User:Akki|Akki]] 18:05, 6 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
# '''A'''. It not only is cool, but who wants a huge logo to break the scene?[[User:Dekuta|Dekuta]] 15:26, 26 October 2008 (UTC) | # '''A'''. It not only is cool, but who wants a huge logo to break the scene?[[User:Dekuta@legacy41959196|Dekuta]] 15:26, 26 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
{{Oppose}} | {{Oppose}} | ||
# I don't like either one. '''A''' is too zoomed in, and '''B''' has a logo. There needs to be a different Phantom Hourglass picture featured.--[[User: | # I don't like either one. '''A''' is too zoomed in, and '''B''' has a logo. There needs to be a different Phantom Hourglass picture featured.--[[User:Lt. Hammerspace@legacy41959211|HeroOfTime6]] 19:47, 17 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
# Actually... yeah, I agree with HeroOfTime on this. --[[User:Douken|Douken]] 22:05, 17 November 2008 (UTC) | # Actually... yeah, I agree with HeroOfTime on this. --[[User:Douken@legacy41958225|Douken]] 22:05, 17 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
{{clear}} | {{clear}} | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{hide | {{hide | ||
| header= [[:File: | | header= [[:File:TMC Cave of Flames Artwork.png|Link and Ezlo.png]] — Failed on November 18, 2008 | ||
| content= | | content= | ||
[[File: | [[File:TMC Cave of Flames Artwork.png|thumb|300px]] | ||
Why only one {{TMC}} choice? Why not three?! Let the battle begin!{{:User: | Why only one {{TMC}} choice? Why not three?! Let the battle begin!{{:User:Emma/sig|~}} <span style="color:#C0C0C0;">22:51, November 15, 2008 (UTC)</span> | ||
{{Support}} | {{Support}} | ||
{{Oppose}} | {{Oppose}} | ||
#I like the art style, and this is definitely a ''good'' image, but far from a ''featured'' image. --[[User:Douken|Douken]] 05:14, 17 November 2008 (UTC) | #I like the art style, and this is definitely a ''good'' image, but far from a ''featured'' image. --[[User:Douken@legacy41958225|Douken]] 05:14, 17 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
# I think Douken is right, its a good picture and all but I think there are much better Minish Cap pictures than this one to be featured. Its just them floating around. --[[User:Kresh64|Kresh64]] 21:31, 17 November 2008 (UTC) | # I think Douken is right, its a good picture and all but I think there are much better Minish Cap pictures than this one to be featured. Its just them floating around. --[[User:Kresh64|Kresh64]] 21:31, 17 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
#This is a good picture, but there isn't enough excitement . Unlike "Big Chu" and "Link and Big Key" this just doesn't deserve to be featured.--[[User:Link hero of light|Link hero of light]] 15:50, 18 November 2008 (UTC) | #This is a good picture, but there isn't enough excitement . Unlike "Big Chu" and "Link and Big Key" this just doesn't deserve to be featured.--[[User:Link hero of light@legacy41958106|Link hero of light]] 15:50, 18 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
{{Clear}} | {{Clear}} | ||
}} | }} | ||
Line 447: | Line 447: | ||
| content= | | content= | ||
[[File:Twilight Sword.png|thumb]] | [[File:Twilight Sword.png|thumb]] | ||
This is an amazing, beautiful, wonderful, awesome picture. This is one of Steve's best picture I've ever seen. I have no idea how he managed to get this picture! This is a rare shot!--[[User:Link hero of light|Link hero of light]] 01:11, 19 December 2008 (UTC) | This is an amazing, beautiful, wonderful, awesome picture. This is one of Steve's best picture I've ever seen. I have no idea how he managed to get this picture! This is a rare shot!--[[User:Link hero of light@legacy41958106|Link hero of light]] 01:11, 19 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
{{Support}} | {{Support}} | ||
#Wow I've never seen this picture before, only on the game.--[[User:Lt. Hammerspace|Lt. Hammerspace]] 03:37, 19 December 2008 (UTC) | #Wow I've never seen this picture before, only on the game.--[[User:Lt. Hammerspace@legacy41959211|Lt. Hammerspace]] 03:37, 19 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
# I dont know why but I love this sword.It just looks so crazy how each part of the sword is different,and the eye on the hilt is cool aswell. It may be a bit on the small side but its still big enough and the quality of the image is very good. --[[User:Kresh64|Kresh64]] 18:01, 19 December 2008 (UTC) | # I dont know why but I love this sword.It just looks so crazy how each part of the sword is different,and the eye on the hilt is cool aswell. It may be a bit on the small side but its still big enough and the quality of the image is very good. --[[User:Kresh64|Kresh64]] 18:01, 19 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
#Hallelulja-moment! --[[User:Olle93|Olle93]] 17:01, 28 December 2008 (UTC) | #Hallelulja-moment! --[[User:Olle93|Olle93]] 17:01, 28 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
Line 455: | Line 455: | ||
{{Oppose}} | {{Oppose}} | ||
#I dunno, it's kind of small. Also, we already have a featured sword image that's quite a bit larger.--[[User:Rdnckj258|Rdnckj258]] 16:33, 19 December 2008 (UTC) | #I dunno, it's kind of small. Also, we already have a featured sword image that's quite a bit larger.--[[User:Rdnckj258@legacy41958350|Rdnckj258]] 16:33, 19 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
#Mmmm... it's a bit small, and there are several sword images that appear to be more interesting and of higher quality. I understand that there isn't much that can be done with it but... {{:User:Alter/sig}} 19:43, 2 February 2009 (UTC) | #Mmmm... it's a bit small, and there are several sword images that appear to be more interesting and of higher quality. I understand that there isn't much that can be done with it but... {{:User:Alter/sig}} 19:43, 2 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
#It is a good picture. But it's rather on the small side. And not really an important thing.[[User:CoreyPotter|Corey Lord of Tacos!]] 18:09, 21 February 2009 (UTC) | #It is a good picture. But it's rather on the small side. And not really an important thing.[[User:CoreyPotter|Corey Lord of Tacos!]] 18:09, 21 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
{{neutral}} | {{neutral}} | ||
*Yeah. It is good. But from the size, I can't really go either way here.{{:User: | *Yeah. It is good. But from the size, I can't really go either way here.{{:User:Emma/sig|~}} 22:34, February 1, 2009 (UTC) | ||
I guess that's three opposition votes. {{:User:Alter/sig}} 20:29, 21 February 2009 (UTC) | I guess that's three opposition votes. {{:User:Alter/sig}} 20:29, 21 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
Line 467: | Line 467: | ||
{{hide|header=[[:File:TRR Tingle 2.png|TRR Tingle 2.png]] — Failed on March 11, 2009|content= | {{hide|header=[[:File:TRR Tingle 2.png|TRR Tingle 2.png]] — Failed on March 11, 2009|content= | ||
[[File:TRR Tingle 2.png|thumb|150px]] | [[File:TRR Tingle 2.png|thumb|150px]] | ||
For such a major charcter, it's surprising there isn't a featured picture of him. I really like this picture. The look on Tingle's face is...weird.--[[User:Link hero of light|Link hero of light]] 23:39, 11 January 2009 (UTC) | For such a major charcter, it's surprising there isn't a featured picture of him. I really like this picture. The look on Tingle's face is...weird.--[[User:Link hero of light@legacy41958106|Link hero of light]] 23:39, 11 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
{{Support}} | {{Support}} | ||
{{Oppose}} | {{Oppose}} | ||
#The Picture in question is not suitable to be featured, if Tingle does get a featured picture it should have a better style and be more interesting.--[[User:Gillispie|Gillispie]] 01:33, 18 January 2009 (UTC) | #The Picture in question is not suitable to be featured, if Tingle does get a featured picture it should have a better style and be more interesting.--[[User:Gillispie|Gillispie]] 01:33, 18 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
#<s>Wow this picture is stupid. Im sure you guys could find a better tingle image.--[[User:Lt. Hammerspace|Lt. Hammerspace]] 21:05, 19 | #<s>Wow this picture is stupid. Im sure you guys could find a better tingle image.--[[User:Lt. Hammerspace@legacy41959211|Lt. Hammerspace]] 21:05, 19 | ||
February 2009 (UTC) </s> | February 2009 (UTC) </s> | ||
:*Above vote negated per opposition guidelines at the top of the page. {{:User: | :*Above vote negated per opposition guidelines at the top of the page. {{:User:Adam660@legacy41957735/sig}} 08:28, 22 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
#I was unable to find anything on whether or not I can nominate and vote during the same month, so I'll assume that I can for now. Frankly, I think this picture is quite boring. It's about the most common image of [[Tingle]] that's out there, and there are several images of him that appear to be larger and more interesting than this one. Come on, vote for something more original, people! {{:User:Alter/sig}} 18:55, 23 February 2009 (UTC) | #I was unable to find anything on whether or not I can nominate and vote during the same month, so I'll assume that I can for now. Frankly, I think this picture is quite boring. It's about the most common image of [[Tingle]] that's out there, and there are several images of him that appear to be larger and more interesting than this one. Come on, vote for something more original, people! {{:User:Alter/sig}} 18:55, 23 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
#There is not that much that is interesting in this image. It is kind of bland. And it is much too small to be featured. Far too small.{{:User: | #There is not that much that is interesting in this image. It is kind of bland. And it is much too small to be featured. Far too small.{{:User:Emma/sig|~}} 02:16, March 11, 2009 (UTC) | ||
{{neutral}} | {{neutral}} | ||
*Well, if we should have featured picture of Tingle, I personally would like a art work from wind wake more because I like that style better, but that´s just me...--[[User:Olle93|Olle93]] 19:10, 13 January 2009 (UTC) | *Well, if we should have featured picture of Tingle, I personally would like a art work from wind wake more because I like that style better, but that´s just me...--[[User:Olle93|Olle93]] 19:10, 13 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
*I'd like to see a featured picture of Tingle, but if I had the choice it wouldn't be this one. It's not the most interesting picture of Tingle nor is it the highest quality one. In my opinion there are better pictures of Tingle which would be more deserving of a feautured picture, not least the picture of Tingle taken from the game's box art. -- [[User: Tingle :)]] | *I'd like to see a featured picture of Tingle, but if I had the choice it wouldn't be this one. It's not the most interesting picture of Tingle nor is it the highest quality one. In my opinion there are better pictures of Tingle which would be more deserving of a feautured picture, not least the picture of Tingle taken from the game's box art. -- [[User: Tingle :)]] | ||
*So, Adam you don't think this picture is stupid...I mean come on its horrible. At least find a more classic picture.--[[User:Lt. Hammerspace|Lt. Hammerspace]] 02:01, 11 March 2009 (UTC) | *So, Adam you don't think this picture is stupid...I mean come on its horrible. At least find a more classic picture.--[[User:Lt. Hammerspace@legacy41959211|Lt. Hammerspace]] 02:01, 11 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
**That may be. But an invalid vote is still an invalid vote. There was nothing personal about it. it had nothing to do with what Adam thought of the image. The guidelines are clearly defined above and your vote is in violation of those guidelines.{{:User: | **That may be. But an invalid vote is still an invalid vote. There was nothing personal about it. it had nothing to do with what Adam thought of the image. The guidelines are clearly defined above and your vote is in violation of those guidelines.{{:User:Emma/sig|~}} 02:16, March 11, 2009 (UTC) | ||
{{Clear}} | {{Clear}} | ||
}} | }} | ||
Line 487: | Line 487: | ||
{{hide|header=[[:File:MM Twinmold Artwork.png|MM Twinmold Artwork.png]] — Failed on April 14, 2009|content= | {{hide|header=[[:File:MM Twinmold Artwork.png|MM Twinmold Artwork.png]] — Failed on April 14, 2009|content= | ||
[[File:MM Twinmold Artwork.png|300px|frameless|right]] | [[File:MM Twinmold Artwork.png|300px|frameless|right]] | ||
I was looking at the bosses of Zelda the other day, and this image caught my eye above a lot of other images. It's a really good image done (edited) by Markol, and one of few MM pictures I've seen which are truly awesome. --[[User:Yuvorias|Felicia's Champion]] 05:42, 18 November 2008 (UTC) | I was looking at the bosses of Zelda the other day, and this image caught my eye above a lot of other images. It's a really good image done (edited) by Markol, and one of few MM pictures I've seen which are truly awesome. --[[User:Yuvorias@legacy41958105|Felicia's Champion]] 05:42, 18 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
{{Support}} | {{Support}} | ||
#I really like this picture. There's something about Majora's Mask artwork for the characters and monsters that I really liked, and still do to this day. [[User:Ancblue52|Ancblue52]] 05:01, 15 December 2008 (UTC) | #I really like this picture. There's something about Majora's Mask artwork for the characters and monsters that I really liked, and still do to this day. [[User:Ancblue52|Ancblue52]] 05:01, 15 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
{{Oppose}} | {{Oppose}} | ||
#This picture has too much shadow and is too hard to see. It also doesn't have very good perspective making the giant Twinmold look small.--[[User:Link hero of light|Link hero of light]] 01:51, 4 December 2008 (UTC) | #This picture has too much shadow and is too hard to see. It also doesn't have very good perspective making the giant Twinmold look small.--[[User:Link hero of light@legacy41958106|Link hero of light]] 01:51, 4 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
#In almost 5 months, this image has gained '''one''' vote in support. It's clear that this is never going to reach featured status, and with that kind of overwhelming clamor of support it's clear that it doesn't deserve to. To me, the image is mediocre; I have no strong feelings either way about the style or content. Maybe that's why it's been here so long, and why it has to go. {{:User: | #In almost 5 months, this image has gained '''one''' vote in support. It's clear that this is never going to reach featured status, and with that kind of overwhelming clamor of support it's clear that it doesn't deserve to. To me, the image is mediocre; I have no strong feelings either way about the style or content. Maybe that's why it's been here so long, and why it has to go. {{:User:Adam660@legacy41957735/sig}} 21:30, 12 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
#The image looks very shadowed, and it's relatively boring. And I agree- no one is in support of this picture, so it's obviously not going get FS anytime soon. I guess that's three votes. {{:User:Alter/sig}} 01:14, 14 April 2009 (UTC) | #The image looks very shadowed, and it's relatively boring. And I agree- no one is in support of this picture, so it's obviously not going get FS anytime soon. I guess that's three votes. {{:User:Alter/sig}} 01:14, 14 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
Line 499: | Line 499: | ||
Well... Majoras mask artwork tend to have a little to much shadows and this picture is not an exception. But it doesn´t feel right to oppose it because it isn´t a bad picture... Well... Just wanted to say it... Wait, I change my mind. This, of all the MM -artwork, does not have too much shadows, it is great. So come on everyone vote for this picture now... -[[User:Olle93|Olle93]] 20:21, 25 November 2008 (UTC) | Well... Majoras mask artwork tend to have a little to much shadows and this picture is not an exception. But it doesn´t feel right to oppose it because it isn´t a bad picture... Well... Just wanted to say it... Wait, I change my mind. This, of all the MM -artwork, does not have too much shadows, it is great. So come on everyone vote for this picture now... -[[User:Olle93|Olle93]] 20:21, 25 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
::The image has been tweaked to fix the problem with the shadows.{{:User: | ::The image has been tweaked to fix the problem with the shadows.{{:User:Emma/sig|~}} <span style="color:#C0C0C0;">06:56, December 15, 2008 (UTC)</span> | ||
Now it's worse! I liked it much better with the shadows!--[[User:Link hero of light|Link hero of light]] 01:05, 17 December 2008 (UTC) | Now it's worse! I liked it much better with the shadows!--[[User:Link hero of light@legacy41958106|Link hero of light]] 01:05, 17 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
:Well, then. Don't complain about it then. You can either like it with shadows or without. Not both.{{:User: | :Well, then. Don't complain about it then. You can either like it with shadows or without. Not both.{{:User:Emma/sig|~}} 00:15, December 30, 2008 (UTC) | ||
I don't like it either way, but I prefer the it with shadows.--[[User:Link hero of light|Link hero of light]] 06:56, 4 January 2009 (UTC) | I don't like it either way, but I prefer the it with shadows.--[[User:Link hero of light@legacy41958106|Link hero of light]] 06:56, 4 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
The shadow style is just a part of Majora's Mask art style. Nothing wrong with that. Although I don't really like Twinmold, and the image is kinda small I think. [[User: | The shadow style is just a part of Majora's Mask art style. Nothing wrong with that. Although I don't really like Twinmold, and the image is kinda small I think. [[User:Midoro|The Goron Moron]] 07:04, 4 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
:If it didn't have the shadows, it wouldn't be Majora's Mask ;)--{{:User: | :If it didn't have the shadows, it wouldn't be Majora's Mask ;)--{{:User:Mandi2517@legacy41958928/sig}} 07:06, 4 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
::...I haven't checked this out since I nominated it. It's much...brighter than I remember it. I preferred the previous darker version, and so am very tempted to oppose my own nomination. But, there's probably something in the rules against that. So I won't. --[[User:Yuvorias|Felicia's Champion]] 06:37, 13 April 2009 (UTC) | ::...I haven't checked this out since I nominated it. It's much...brighter than I remember it. I preferred the previous darker version, and so am very tempted to oppose my own nomination. But, there's probably something in the rules against that. So I won't. --[[User:Yuvorias@legacy41958105|Felicia's Champion]] 06:37, 13 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{hide|header=[[:File:PhantomHourglassscene13.png|PhantomHourglassscene13.png]] (Bellumbeck) — Failed on April 18, 2009 | {{hide|header=[[:File:PhantomHourglassscene13.png|PhantomHourglassscene13.png]] (Bellumbeck) — Failed on April 18, 2009 | ||
|content= | |content= | ||
[[File:PhantomHourglassscene13.png|thumb|400px]] | [[File:PhantomHourglassscene13.png|thumb|400px]] | ||
This picture is from the ending sequence of Phantom Hourglass. I think it's style is pretty neat.--[[User:Link hero of light|Link hero of light]] 16:26, 28 March 2009 (UTC) | This picture is from the ending sequence of Phantom Hourglass. I think it's style is pretty neat.--[[User:Link hero of light@legacy41958106|Link hero of light]] 16:26, 28 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
{{Support}} | {{Support}} | ||
#This is a great picture showcasing the artstyle of Phantom Hourglass's cutscenes. I major Yes. -[[User:ATRUEZELDAFAN|ATRUEZELDAFAN]] 13:32, 31 March 2009 (UTC) | #This is a great picture showcasing the artstyle of Phantom Hourglass's cutscenes. I major Yes. -[[User:ATRUEZELDAFAN|ATRUEZELDAFAN]] 13:32, 31 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
#PH has no featured pictures yet, this is worthy on it it's own, it reflects the action and style of the game very nicely. Much more than being a nice image, it's the perfect example of what can be expected from Ph's innocent appearance and fearsome phantoms. {{:User:Axiomist1875/sig}} 06:44, 8 April 2009 (UTC) | #PH has no featured pictures yet, this is worthy on it it's own, it reflects the action and style of the game very nicely. Much more than being a nice image, it's the perfect example of what can be expected from Ph's innocent appearance and fearsome phantoms. {{:User:Axiomist1875@legacy41958496/sig}} 06:44, 8 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
#An awesome picture, very stylish and cool looking. Also, a nice action scene. [[User:Axle the Beast|Axle the Beast]] 04:10, 11 April 2009 (UTC) | #An awesome picture, very stylish and cool looking. Also, a nice action scene. [[User:Axle the Beast|Axle the Beast]] 04:10, 11 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
#I love this style and tried to do something like that, too. And therefore I can say that this picture is one of the best from the cutscences and not as simple, as it may seem. And also, if PH doesn't have any featured pictures yet, this is another point for it. --[[User:Nelde|Nelde]] 18:39, 12 April 2009 (UTC) | #I love this style and tried to do something like that, too. And therefore I can say that this picture is one of the best from the cutscences and not as simple, as it may seem. And also, if PH doesn't have any featured pictures yet, this is another point for it. --[[User:Nelde|Nelde]] 18:39, 12 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
Line 526: | Line 526: | ||
#The Phantom Hourglass cut out style is so unique![[User:CoreyPotter|Corey Lord of Tacos!]] 02:02, 18 April 2009 (UTC) | #The Phantom Hourglass cut out style is so unique![[User:CoreyPotter|Corey Lord of Tacos!]] 02:02, 18 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
{{Oppose}} | {{Oppose}} | ||
#This image is incredibly small. It is much smaller than most of our currently featured images. Plus it is one image out of many that are very similar to it. Doesn't really strike me as awesome. Not compared to what we have.{{:User: | #This image is incredibly small. It is much smaller than most of our currently featured images. Plus it is one image out of many that are very similar to it. Doesn't really strike me as awesome. Not compared to what we have.{{:User:Emma/sig|~}} 21:47, April 15, 2009 (UTC) | ||
#I agree with Matt. Although Bellumbeck is awesome, this cutout doesn't stand out from the others in my opinion and doesn't really seem like much compared to other nominees. Kind of droll really. Then there's the size. {{:User:Melchizedek1866/sig 04:12, 16 April 2009 (UTC) | #I agree with Matt. Although Bellumbeck is awesome, this cutout doesn't stand out from the others in my opinion and doesn't really seem like much compared to other nominees. Kind of droll really. Then there's the size. {{:User:Melchizedek1866@legacy41958488/sig}} 04:12, 16 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
#Bellumbeck would have made a good featured picture however, this image is incredibly small. Hardly eye catching or even interesting. Not really feature worthy.{{:User: | #Bellumbeck would have made a good featured picture however, this image is incredibly small. Hardly eye catching or even interesting. Not really feature worthy.{{:User:Mandi2517@legacy41958928/sig}} 02:21, 18 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
{{neutral}} | {{neutral}} | ||
Size is reason enough to not vote for it, but hardly justifiable to Oppose an image. The Images above are all great but Opposition votes with the reason of "We already have several very similar images featured." would fit in the rules as stated above. Just bear that in mind before Failing this image. {{:User:Axiomist1875/sig}} 04:23, 16 April 2009 (UTC) | Size is reason enough to not vote for it, but hardly justifiable to Oppose an image. The Images above are all great but Opposition votes with the reason of "We already have several very similar images featured." would fit in the rules as stated above. Just bear that in mind before Failing this image. {{:User:Axiomist1875@legacy41958496/sig}} 04:23, 16 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
I as well, will not oppose this image, we have had ''Phantom Hourglass'' nominations before. I'd hate to see this one fail because of my vote, but it's certainly not featured material. First of all, Link hero of light, when Matt and Mel told you the image is too small, they meant the image itself; increasing the thumbnail size will do no good. Also by "large", they mean LARGE at least 900px in height, and size of an image does matter (large images give the "wow factor"). Even in the guidelines it states "it's too low resolution" as one of the examples as a justifiable opposition.{{:User:Steven2113/sig}} 20:31, 16 April 2009 (UTC) | I as well, will not oppose this image, we have had ''Phantom Hourglass'' nominations before. I'd hate to see this one fail because of my vote, but it's certainly not featured material. First of all, Link hero of light, when Matt and Mel told you the image is too small, they meant the image itself; increasing the thumbnail size will do no good. Also by "large", they mean LARGE at least 900px in height, and size of an image does matter (large images give the "wow factor"). Even in the guidelines it states "it's too low resolution" as one of the examples as a justifiable opposition.{{:User:Steven2113@legacy41958623/sig}} 20:31, 16 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
{{clear}} | {{clear}} | ||
Line 539: | Line 539: | ||
{{hide|header=[[:File:OoT Link Riding Epona Artwork.png|Epona w link.png]] (Link with Epona) — Failed on October 1, 2009|content= | {{hide|header=[[:File:OoT Link Riding Epona Artwork.png|Epona w link.png]] (Link with Epona) — Failed on October 1, 2009|content= | ||
[[File:OoT Link Riding Epona Artwork.png|thumb|right]] | [[File:OoT Link Riding Epona Artwork.png|thumb|right]] | ||
This is a very cool image that needs to be featured. There are not very many Epona pictures but I think this one is the best. It really captures the image of Ocarina of Time. It is very nicely drawn and old school. It needs to be featured.--[[User:Lt. Hammerspace|Lt. Hammerspace]] 03:30, 29 September 2009 (UTC) | This is a very cool image that needs to be featured. There are not very many Epona pictures but I think this one is the best. It really captures the image of Ocarina of Time. It is very nicely drawn and old school. It needs to be featured.--[[User:Lt. Hammerspace@legacy41959211|Lt. Hammerspace]] 03:30, 29 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
{{Support}} | {{Support}} | ||
{{Oppose}} | {{Oppose}} | ||
#Eh...my first and real gripe with this image is the quality. It seems choppy and the transparency job is rather poor. It's also rather uninteresting.{{:User: | #Eh...my first and real gripe with this image is the quality. It seems choppy and the transparency job is rather poor. It's also rather uninteresting.{{:User:Mandi2517@legacy41958928/sig}} 04:39, 30 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
#The transparency job is done badly, but the image also offers nothing special. It is rather stock-standard, not encapsulating any mood or interest. It doesn't draw people in. {{:User:Melchizedek1866/sig 04:11, 1 October 2009 (UTC) | #The transparency job is done badly, but the image also offers nothing special. It is rather stock-standard, not encapsulating any mood or interest. It doesn't draw people in. {{:User:Melchizedek1866@legacy41958488/sig}} 04:11, 1 October 2009 (UTC) | ||
#There are several visible leftovers from a quick and somewhat sloppy transparency job. The tail seems a little choppy and it looks like the sword is missing a few pixels. The tail and mane also look like parts are missing as well as having some background left over. As far as I'm concerned this isn't the highest of quality.{{:User: | #There are several visible leftovers from a quick and somewhat sloppy transparency job. The tail seems a little choppy and it looks like the sword is missing a few pixels. The tail and mane also look like parts are missing as well as having some background left over. As far as I'm concerned this isn't the highest of quality.{{:User:Emma/sig|~}} 04:32, October 1, 2009 (UTC) | ||
{{negated}} | {{negated}} | ||
Line 551: | Line 551: | ||
{{neutral}} | {{neutral}} | ||
#Clean it up, and then we'll talk. Also, doesn't Link know it's dangerous to lean back on a horse while it's rearing? [[User:Noble Wrot|Noble Wrot]] 05:41, 29 September 2009 (UTC) | #Clean it up, and then we'll talk. Also, doesn't Link know it's dangerous to lean back on a horse while it's rearing? [[User:Noble Wrot@legacy41959850|Noble Wrot]] 05:41, 29 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
#The image doesn't look that great now that I know what it is. It's not bad, but not featured quality. {{:User:Alter/sig}} 18:14, 30 September 2009 (UTC) | #The image doesn't look that great now that I know what it is. It's not bad, but not featured quality. {{:User:Alter/sig}} 18:14, 30 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{hide|header=[[:File:TMC Link | {{hide|header=[[:File:TMC Link Artwork 8.png|Link and Ezlo Still Life.png]] (Link and Ezlo Still Life) — Failed on May 10, 2010|content= | ||
[[File:TMC Link | [[File:TMC Link Artwork 8.png|right|thumb|Link and Ezlo Still Life]] | ||
Boy do we love {{TMC}} here at ZW! This image brilliantly captures the relationship between Link and Ezlo, reminiscent of Link and Navi from ''Ocarina of Time'' - Ezlo always tries to provide Link advice and "get through to Link's head", literally! With it's expertly done transparency, cartoony, yet vivid contrast, and nice size, this image is definitely overqualified for the Featured Pictures category! {{:User:Cipriano 119/sig}} 21:32, 11 April 2010 (UTC) | Boy do we love {{TMC}} here at ZW! This image brilliantly captures the relationship between Link and Ezlo, reminiscent of Link and Navi from ''Ocarina of Time'' - Ezlo always tries to provide Link advice and "get through to Link's head", literally! With it's expertly done transparency, cartoony, yet vivid contrast, and nice size, this image is definitely overqualified for the Featured Pictures category! {{:User:Cipriano 119/sig}} 21:32, 11 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
Line 571: | Line 571: | ||
{{hide|header=[[:File:ST Link Phantom Zelda Spirit Train Artwork.png|ST Link Phantom Zelda Spirit Train Artwork.png]] (Spirit Tracks Artwork) — Failed on July 28, 2010|content= | {{hide|header=[[:File:ST Link Phantom Zelda Spirit Train Artwork.png|ST Link Phantom Zelda Spirit Train Artwork.png]] (Spirit Tracks Artwork) — Failed on July 28, 2010|content= | ||
[[File:ST Link Phantom Zelda Spirit Train Artwork.png|right|thumb|Spirit Tracks Artwork]] | [[File:ST Link Phantom Zelda Spirit Train Artwork.png|right|thumb|Spirit Tracks Artwork]] | ||
This image is interesting ''and'' has great quality. Definitely sums up the awesomeness of Spirit Tracks.{{:User: | This image is interesting ''and'' has great quality. Definitely sums up the awesomeness of Spirit Tracks.{{:User:Mandi2517@legacy41958928/sig}} 07:17, December 30, 2009 (UTC) | ||
{{Support}} | {{Support}} | ||
Line 589: | Line 589: | ||
# I like the art style, and it has pretty good transparency.[[User:Ottobot|Ottobot]] 23:19, 28 July 2010 (UTC) | # I like the art style, and it has pretty good transparency.[[User:Ottobot|Ottobot]] 23:19, 28 July 2010 (UTC) | ||
{{Oppose}} | {{Oppose}} | ||
#Uh... the quality of this image is very poor. The edges are ugly: It looks like a Cucco pecked a keyboard to do the transparency. And it looks like it's a low-quality scan that was blown up to size, so it's all pixelated. Frankly I'd be embarrassed to have something with such low quality featured.{{:User: | #Uh... the quality of this image is very poor. The edges are ugly: It looks like a Cucco pecked a keyboard to do the transparency. And it looks like it's a low-quality scan that was blown up to size, so it's all pixelated. Frankly I'd be embarrassed to have something with such low quality featured.{{:User:Emma/sig|~}} 04:27, September 13, 2010 (UTC) | ||
#The quality isn't very good, and the transparency is bad considering there's a white line around the whole thing. {{:User: | #The quality isn't very good, and the transparency is bad considering there's a white line around the whole thing. {{:User:Mandi2517@legacy41958928/sig}} 04:47, September 13, 2010 (UTC) | ||
#I'm not a fan of the style, mainly because it makes the image appear blotty and horrible. We're really looking for some higher quality images to feature, not ones that make people look and think "Ew, that's messed up." I know it's really supposed to look that way, but it just isn't presentable. Sorry, but I gotta oppose.{{:User:Justin ZW/sig}} 20:55, 13 September 2010 (EDT) | #I'm not a fan of the style, mainly because it makes the image appear blotty and horrible. We're really looking for some higher quality images to feature, not ones that make people look and think "Ew, that's messed up." I know it's really supposed to look that way, but it just isn't presentable. Sorry, but I gotta oppose.{{:User:Justin ZW/sig}} 20:55, 13 September 2010 (EDT) | ||
{{Neutral}} | {{Neutral}} | ||
Line 597: | Line 597: | ||
{{clear}} | {{clear}} | ||
{{hide|header=[[:File:Ambrosia Lite.png|Ambrosia Lite.png]] (Ambrosia Lite) — Failed on October 7, 2010|content= | {{hide|header=[[:File:TLoZ (Valiant Comics) Ambrosia Lite Artwork.png|Ambrosia Lite.png]] (Ambrosia Lite) — Failed on October 7, 2010|content= | ||
[[File:Ambrosia Lite.png|right|thumb|[[Ambrosia Lite]]. Have some.]] | [[File:TLoZ (Valiant Comics) Ambrosia Lite Artwork.png|right|thumb|[[Ambrosia Lite]]. Have some.]] | ||
This image really sums up the awesomeness of the [[Valiant Comics]]. Whether you're a fan or not, this is a fun, high-quality image (as high as it can get), which 99% of the Zelda population has never seen before now. Cast your vote below, and remember- drink responsibly. {{:User:Alter/sig}} <span style="color: #FFFFFF;">05:46, December 16, 2009 (UTC)</span> | This image really sums up the awesomeness of the [[Valiant Comics]]. Whether you're a fan or not, this is a fun, high-quality image (as high as it can get), which 99% of the Zelda population has never seen before now. Cast your vote below, and remember- drink responsibly. {{:User:Alter/sig}} <span style="color: #FFFFFF;">05:46, December 16, 2009 (UTC)</span> | ||
Line 604: | Line 604: | ||
#I don't know why, but I really like this image. Like Alter mentioned, it's not a well-known image, and the details are pretty amazing. Definitely should be featured! [[User:Dany36|Dany36]] 05:52, 16 December 2009 (UTC) | #I don't know why, but I really like this image. Like Alter mentioned, it's not a well-known image, and the details are pretty amazing. Definitely should be featured! [[User:Dany36|Dany36]] 05:52, 16 December 2009 (UTC) | ||
#This is a great image. Good quality considering it's from the comics, and while some people may wonder why an image like this could be featured, I think that the curiosity raised is a nice opportunity for Zelda fans to learn about the comics. Given their age, there's a good chance that later-generation fans may have never even heard of them before. [[User:Shona3212|Shona]] 09:11, 6 January 2010 (UTC) | #This is a great image. Good quality considering it's from the comics, and while some people may wonder why an image like this could be featured, I think that the curiosity raised is a nice opportunity for Zelda fans to learn about the comics. Given their age, there's a good chance that later-generation fans may have never even heard of them before. [[User:Shona3212|Shona]] 09:11, 6 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
#Definitely. I still need to get those comics, anyway it'll be good to raise awareness the comics and the older games. [[User:PureLocke|PureLocke]] 22:08, 28 May 2010 (UTC) | #Definitely. I still need to get those comics, anyway it'll be good to raise awareness the comics and the older games. [[User:PureLocke@legacy41961787|PureLocke]] 22:08, 28 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
#Wow, totally unique, and the quality is surprisingly good. I say we have more obscure pics like this in the future! {{User:Pyrobomber/sig}} 02:23, 18 June 2010 (UTC) | #Wow, totally unique, and the quality is surprisingly good. I say we have more obscure pics like this in the future! {{User:Pyrobomber/sig}} 02:23, 18 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
{{Oppose}} | {{Oppose}} | ||
#To me, this seems like a rather small part of Zelda and Valiant Comics. It is deatiled, but there's nothing special about it. --F4{[Domino29]} 21:17, 12 August 2010 (EDT) | #To me, this seems like a rather small part of Zelda and Valiant Comics. It is deatiled, but there's nothing special about it. --F4{[Domino29]} 21:17, 12 August 2010 (EDT) | ||
#Am I allowed to re-add and re-phrase my vote if it got negated, especially if I feel the negater misunderstood me? Because I wasn't saying that the subject of the picture was bad, I was saying that the picture itself doesn't deserve to be featured. It just looks like a normal picture; nothing special about it. {{User:Minda of Darkness/sig}} | #Am I allowed to re-add and re-phrase my vote if it got negated, especially if I feel the negater misunderstood me? Because I wasn't saying that the subject of the picture was bad, I was saying that the picture itself doesn't deserve to be featured. It just looks like a normal picture; nothing special about it. {{User:Minda of Darkness/sig}} | ||
#Although this technically meets all of the criteria, I feel that the image is a little small in terms of resolution. Also, it doesn't really have the visual impact I'm looking for in something that's going on the main page. Aside from that this was nominated 10 months ago and has only gained four supporting votes; that's enough to convince me that it's never going to make it to featured status. {{:User: | #Although this technically meets all of the criteria, I feel that the image is a little small in terms of resolution. Also, it doesn't really have the visual impact I'm looking for in something that's going on the main page. Aside from that this was nominated 10 months ago and has only gained four supporting votes; that's enough to convince me that it's never going to make it to featured status. {{:User:Adam660@legacy41957735/sig}} 07:59, 7 October 2010 (EDT) | ||
{{neutral}} | {{neutral}} | ||
{{negated}} | {{negated}} | ||
<s>#Guys, it's not even that detailed. {{User:Minda of Darkness/sig}}08:38, 14 September 2010 (EDT)</s> Negated per opposition guideline # 2.{{:User: | <s>#Guys, it's not even that detailed. {{User:Minda of Darkness/sig}}08:38, 14 September 2010 (EDT)</s> Negated per opposition guideline # 2.{{:User:Mandi2517@legacy41958928/sig}} 02:16, September 17, 2010 (UTC) | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{hide | {{hide | ||
Line 623: | Line 623: | ||
{{Oppose}} | {{Oppose}} | ||
#This image isn't that high of quality. It looks rather pixeled and low quality, something you'd see from a crappy scanner.{{:User: | #This image isn't that high of quality. It looks rather pixeled and low quality, something you'd see from a crappy scanner.{{:User:Mandi2517@legacy41958928/sig}} 21:03, November 17, 2010 (UTC) | ||
#I'm going to have to say no here, too. It's way too small and pixelated. It looks like it was scanned out of the Nintendo Power guide, as it's about that size and it's has artifact lines running back and forth on it that look like it's from light leaking into the scanner, like you get when scanning something from a book or magazine. Unless a better version can be found, I don't think this should be featured.{{:User: | #I'm going to have to say no here, too. It's way too small and pixelated. It looks like it was scanned out of the Nintendo Power guide, as it's about that size and it's has artifact lines running back and forth on it that look like it's from light leaking into the scanner, like you get when scanning something from a book or magazine. Unless a better version can be found, I don't think this should be featured.{{:User:Emma/sig|~}} 02:07, February 16, 2011 (UTC) | ||
#Yep, unfortunately the size and quality are too limited for this to be used. Maybe if an improved version can be found this could be nominated again. {{:User: | #Yep, unfortunately the size and quality are too limited for this to be used. Maybe if an improved version can be found this could be nominated again. {{:User:Adam660@legacy41957735/sig}} 08:02, 25 February 2011 (EST) | ||
{{neutral}} | {{neutral}} | ||
Good picture, but please try to find a better, higher-quality version of it for a featured picture. {{:User:Alter/sig}} <span style="color: #FFFFFF;">19:03, November 25, 2010 (UTC)</span> | Good picture, but please try to find a better, higher-quality version of it for a featured picture. {{:User:Alter/sig}} <span style="color: #FFFFFF;">19:03, November 25, 2010 (UTC)</span> | ||
Line 640: | Line 640: | ||
#While there's nothing particularly ''wrong'' with this image, I'm not wowed by it at all. There's no weight to it - it's three rather plain, if accurate, renders in one picture. It needs something more notable to qualify for featured status... something that makes me say to myself, "How have I never seen this amazing picture before?!" {{:User:Embyr 75/sig}} 00:53, 6 May 2011 (EDT) | #While there's nothing particularly ''wrong'' with this image, I'm not wowed by it at all. There's no weight to it - it's three rather plain, if accurate, renders in one picture. It needs something more notable to qualify for featured status... something that makes me say to myself, "How have I never seen this amazing picture before?!" {{:User:Embyr 75/sig}} 00:53, 6 May 2011 (EDT) | ||
#I absolutely agree. There's really nothing that special to me about this picture. If this deserves to be featured, then so does pretty much every other high quality ''Spirit Tracks'' artwork we have. There are plenty of amazing, high quality renders around the Wiki. That doesn't mean they all deserve to be featured. {{:User:Hylian King/sig}} 08:15, 6 May 2011 (EDT) | #I absolutely agree. There's really nothing that special to me about this picture. If this deserves to be featured, then so does pretty much every other high quality ''Spirit Tracks'' artwork we have. There are plenty of amazing, high quality renders around the Wiki. That doesn't mean they all deserve to be featured. {{:User:Hylian King/sig}} 08:15, 6 May 2011 (EDT) | ||
#While this image is fantastic in the respect that it really showcases some of the characters of ''Spirit Tracks'', however it's rather bland, and there's nothing extraordinary considering we have much more interesting images from ''Spirit Tracks''.{{:User: | #While this image is fantastic in the respect that it really showcases some of the characters of ''Spirit Tracks'', however it's rather bland, and there's nothing extraordinary considering we have much more interesting images from ''Spirit Tracks''.{{:User:Mandi2517@legacy41958928/sig}} 18:16, May 6, 2011 (UTC) | ||
{{neutral}} | {{neutral}} | ||
}} | }} | ||
Line 648: | Line 648: | ||
|content= | |content= | ||
[[File:Mirror of Twilight (Back).png|thumb|The Back side of the Mirror of Twilight]] | [[File:Mirror of Twilight (Back).png|thumb|The Back side of the Mirror of Twilight]] | ||
The Mirror of Twilight is a very beautiful work of art yes. Vastly unique. But the back side of the Mirror is just as beautiful and is even more obscure and rarely appreciated. Very few people stop to take a look at the back of the mirror. It is surprisingly intricate and detailed. So I'm choosing to nominate them both at once. This one is for the back of the mirror. Scroll up the page for the front! GO VOTE!{{:User: | The Mirror of Twilight is a very beautiful work of art yes. Vastly unique. But the back side of the Mirror is just as beautiful and is even more obscure and rarely appreciated. Very few people stop to take a look at the back of the mirror. It is surprisingly intricate and detailed. So I'm choosing to nominate them both at once. This one is for the back of the mirror. Scroll up the page for the front! GO VOTE!{{:User:Emma/sig|~}} 01:51, March 30, 2011 (UTC) | ||
{{Support}} | {{Support}} | ||
{{Oppose}} | {{Oppose}} | ||
#The quality here is horrible, and really, who wants to have the '''back''' of something as featured?<span style="color:#3FA9D0;">—★</span>[[User:Chip200|<span style="color:yellow;">Chip</span>]][[User | #The quality here is horrible, and really, who wants to have the '''back''' of something as featured?<span style="color:#3FA9D0;">—★</span>[[User:Chip200|<span style="color:yellow;">Chip</span>]][[User talk:Chip200|<span style="color:orange;"><sup>200</sup></span>]] 14:57, 11 May 2011 (EDT) | ||
#This image looks spectacular in its thumbnail version, however upon viewing full size... not so much. Not only does the resolution seem to be low, but the transparency is choppy and not to mention the black lines are rather obnoxious looking. It's a beautiful image, just not feature quality. {{:User: | #This image looks spectacular in its thumbnail version, however upon viewing full size... not so much. Not only does the resolution seem to be low, but the transparency is choppy and not to mention the black lines are rather obnoxious looking. It's a beautiful image, just not feature quality. {{:User:Mandi2517@legacy41958928/sig}} 23:04, June 30, 2011 (UTC) | ||
#Yeah, it's interesting in terms of something to have in the article, but the image doesn't stand on its own merits. The black lines look weird, and the pixels are all quite visible. Also, it's a circular object, but this image isn't even round; it's a regular [[wikipedia:icosagon|icosagon]]! (yes, I had to look the name up) {{:User: | #Yeah, it's interesting in terms of something to have in the article, but the image doesn't stand on its own merits. The black lines look weird, and the pixels are all quite visible. Also, it's a circular object, but this image isn't even round; it's a regular [[wikipedia:icosagon|icosagon]]! (yes, I had to look the name up) {{:User:Adam660@legacy41957735/sig}} 16:01, 10 July 2011 (EDT) | ||
{{neutral}} | {{neutral}} | ||
#I'd nominate this one because it's just so cool, but my only critique would be that it is a bit blurry '''at full size'''. I believe that making this image smaller (maybe around 20% smaller) may fix a large percentage of the blurriness; across the wiki in thumbnail form, this image looks highly awe-inspiring! {{:User: | #I'd nominate this one because it's just so cool, but my only critique would be that it is a bit blurry '''at full size'''. I believe that making this image smaller (maybe around 20% smaller) may fix a large percentage of the blurriness; across the wiki in thumbnail form, this image looks highly awe-inspiring! {{:User:Cipriano/sig}} 09:16, 6 May 2011 (EDT) | ||
#Ditto Cip's sentiments. I love how this is one of those things you don't see often but just ''looks so cool''... if the blurriness can be dealt with, it will have my vote. {{:User:Embyr 75/sig}} 12:52, 11 May 2011 (EDT) | #Ditto Cip's sentiments. I love how this is one of those things you don't see often but just ''looks so cool''... if the blurriness can be dealt with, it will have my vote. {{:User:Embyr 75/sig}} 12:52, 11 May 2011 (EDT) | ||
{{clear}} | {{clear}} | ||
Line 666: | Line 666: | ||
|header=[[:File:TWW Treasure Sphere Model.png|TWW Treasure Sphere Model.png]] ([[Treasure Sphere]]) - Failed October 9, 2011 | |header=[[:File:TWW Treasure Sphere Model.png|TWW Treasure Sphere Model.png]] ([[Treasure Sphere]]) - Failed October 9, 2011 | ||
|content=[[File:TWW Treasure Sphere Model.png|thumb|Treasure Sphere]] | |content=[[File:TWW Treasure Sphere Model.png|thumb|Treasure Sphere]] | ||
Came across this ages ago, and I've finally got around to nominating it. Sure, it's a minor item gameplay-wise, and only appeared in one game in the series. But does that matter? I never imagined we'd have such a high-quality image of a treasure sphere; I love how it's got the little puff of smoke, and the colour is so eye-popping. I think it's fun and unique, anyone agree? {{:User: | Came across this ages ago, and I've finally got around to nominating it. Sure, it's a minor item gameplay-wise, and only appeared in one game in the series. But does that matter? I never imagined we'd have such a high-quality image of a treasure sphere; I love how it's got the little puff of smoke, and the colour is so eye-popping. I think it's fun and unique, anyone agree? {{:User:Adam660@legacy41957735/sig}} 15:36, 11 May 2011 (EDT) | ||
{{Support}} | {{Support}} | ||
#Brilliant quality and an interesting image. Featuring this image would be a good way to introduce people to an obscure item that they have not seen before. The curling smoke just makes it that much more interesting--[[User:Fierce diety|Fierce diety]] 00:23, 12 May 2011 (EDT) | #Brilliant quality and an interesting image. Featuring this image would be a good way to introduce people to an obscure item that they have not seen before. The curling smoke just makes it that much more interesting--[[User:Fierce diety|Fierce diety]] 00:23, 12 May 2011 (EDT) | ||
Line 674: | Line 674: | ||
{{Oppose}} | {{Oppose}} | ||
#The quality isn't the best, and I think the picture is kind of odd. The smoke seems to have been taken from another shot. [[User:TriforcePieceofWisdom|TriforcePieceofWisdom]] 13:04, 22 June 2011 (EDT) | #The quality isn't the best, and I think the picture is kind of odd. The smoke seems to have been taken from another shot. [[User:TriforcePieceofWisdom|TriforcePieceofWisdom]] 13:04, 22 June 2011 (EDT) | ||
#The quality seems quite poor. The smoke does stand out quite a bit more than it ought to, it isn't the same quality as the rest of the image. It looks like it was just pasted over it, just tacked on after the fact, poorly. Several parts of the image are very blurry, which makes an unpleasant contrast with the parts that are very sharp. I just don't see how it stands out.{{:User: | #The quality seems quite poor. The smoke does stand out quite a bit more than it ought to, it isn't the same quality as the rest of the image. It looks like it was just pasted over it, just tacked on after the fact, poorly. Several parts of the image are very blurry, which makes an unpleasant contrast with the parts that are very sharp. I just don't see how it stands out.{{:User:Emma/sig|~}} 05:23, July 21, 2011 (UTC) | ||
#Now that I've taken a closer look, I'll retract my vote of support for this image. The smoke does indeed look unnatural. {{:User:Hylian King/sig}} 18:06, 5 September 2011 (EDT) | #Now that I've taken a closer look, I'll retract my vote of support for this image. The smoke does indeed look unnatural. {{:User:Hylian King/sig}} 18:06, 5 September 2011 (EDT) | ||
{{neutral}} | {{neutral}} | ||
Line 693: | Line 693: | ||
{{Oppose}} | {{Oppose}} | ||
#It's a good picture—one that certainly speaks volumes—but I don't think it's so special as to be worth featuring. Generally, when I look at any of our current featured pictures, I could stare at them for hours on end. This one is not particularly dazzling; one quick glance and you've seen all there is to see. {{:User:Hylian King/sig}} 07:25, 8 November 2011 (EST) | #It's a good picture—one that certainly speaks volumes—but I don't think it's so special as to be worth featuring. Generally, when I look at any of our current featured pictures, I could stare at them for hours on end. This one is not particularly dazzling; one quick glance and you've seen all there is to see. {{:User:Hylian King/sig}} 07:25, 8 November 2011 (EST) | ||
# I have to agree with Hylian King here. I do not see anything particularly iconic about this image. It seems the moment is not very memorable compared to other events in the game. There are better images represented in the same style as this one, too. It is not a bad image, but it is not Featured Picture worthy either. [[User:Noble Wrot|Noble Wrot]] 12:51, 17 December 2011 (EST) | # I have to agree with Hylian King here. I do not see anything particularly iconic about this image. It seems the moment is not very memorable compared to other events in the game. There are better images represented in the same style as this one, too. It is not a bad image, but it is not Featured Picture worthy either. [[User:Noble Wrot@legacy41959850|Noble Wrot]] 12:51, 17 December 2011 (EST) | ||
#Not only is this just one of a series of similar images, it's also way too small to feature (I'm certainly not convinced that it meets criteria 3 or 4 of the guidelines above). {{:User: | #Not only is this just one of a series of similar images, it's also way too small to feature (I'm certainly not convinced that it meets criteria 3 or 4 of the guidelines above). {{:User:Adam660@legacy41957735/sig}} 02:27, 28 February 2012 (EST) | ||
{{neutral}} | {{neutral}} | ||
}} | }} | ||
Line 701: | Line 701: | ||
|content= | |content= | ||
[[File:Mirror of Twilight (Front).png|thumb|The front side of the Mirror of Twilight]] | [[File:Mirror of Twilight (Front).png|thumb|The front side of the Mirror of Twilight]] | ||
The Mirror of Twilight is a very beautiful work of art that is rarely seen in the series. Vastly unique. But the problem is that arguably the back side of the Mirror is just as beautiful and is even more obscure and rarely appreciated. It's appearance is so intricate and alluring on either side that you can't stop staring at it. (Now we now why Yeta couldn't stop looking at it!) So I'm choosing to nominate them both at once. This one is for the front of the mirror. Scroll down the page for the back! GO VOTE!{{:User: | The Mirror of Twilight is a very beautiful work of art that is rarely seen in the series. Vastly unique. But the problem is that arguably the back side of the Mirror is just as beautiful and is even more obscure and rarely appreciated. It's appearance is so intricate and alluring on either side that you can't stop staring at it. (Now we now why Yeta couldn't stop looking at it!) So I'm choosing to nominate them both at once. This one is for the front of the mirror. Scroll down the page for the back! GO VOTE!{{:User:Emma/sig|~}} 01:51, March 30, 2011 (UTC) | ||
{{Support}} | {{Support}} | ||
Line 707: | Line 707: | ||
# This is image is supported by me because i think the Mirror Of Twilight is a very cool item also if you look at this picture it gives off kind of a rotating illusion.[[User:Sammoldy|Sammoldy]] 04:20, 3 November 2011 (EDT) | # This is image is supported by me because i think the Mirror Of Twilight is a very cool item also if you look at this picture it gives off kind of a rotating illusion.[[User:Sammoldy|Sammoldy]] 04:20, 3 November 2011 (EDT) | ||
# This is a very beautiful image, and it is not blurry or dark. Also, the main focus of the picture is the mirror, because there is no background to get in the way. --12:36, 23 October 2011 (EDT)[[User: | # This is a very beautiful image, and it is not blurry or dark. Also, the main focus of the picture is the mirror, because there is no background to get in the way. --12:36, 23 October 2011 (EDT)[[User:Planetbox@legacy41964341|Person777]] 12:36, 23 October 2011 (EDT) | ||
{{Oppose}} | {{Oppose}} | ||
#While it looks OK in thumbnail view, I have to say I don't think the image quality is good enough to feature it. There's that weird black line around the inner edge. And the fact that it's angular instead of circular... Also, as a unique magical object, to me it's much more epic when it's actually doing it's thing than just sitting there as a flat surface. EDIT: Plus, [[:File:Mirror_of_Twilight.gif|this version]] is significantly better! {{:User: | #While it looks OK in thumbnail view, I have to say I don't think the image quality is good enough to feature it. There's that weird black line around the inner edge. And the fact that it's angular instead of circular... Also, as a unique magical object, to me it's much more epic when it's actually doing it's thing than just sitting there as a flat surface. EDIT: Plus, [[:File:Mirror_of_Twilight.gif|this version]] is significantly better! {{:User:Adam660@legacy41957735/sig}} 02:27, 28 February 2012 (EST) | ||
#it's really blurry in the full view, plus the edges are a bit jagged--[[User:Themudkipman|Themudkipman]] 12:42, 22 May 2012 (EDT) | #it's really blurry in the full view, plus the edges are a bit jagged--[[User:Themudkipman|Themudkipman]] 12:42, 22 May 2012 (EDT) | ||
#Agreed on what the previous two comments have said...the image in full view is not as pleasant as the thumbnail view: blurry and rough edges are not qualities of a featured picture. --[[User:Dany36|Dany36]] 13:57, 12 July 2012 (EDT) | #Agreed on what the previous two comments have said...the image in full view is not as pleasant as the thumbnail view: blurry and rough edges are not qualities of a featured picture. --[[User:Dany36|Dany36]] 13:57, 12 July 2012 (EDT) | ||
Line 722: | Line 722: | ||
{{hide | {{hide | ||
|header=[[:File:SS | |header=[[:File:SS Faron Woods Artwork.png]] (Scenery from {{SS}}) — Failed on July 10, 2011 | ||
|content= | |content= | ||
[[File:SS | [[File:SS Faron Woods Artwork.png|thumb|right|''Skyward Sword'' scenery]] | ||
Nintendo has described the graphical style of this game as "a painting coming to life", and who could argue? With its great quality and breathtaking view, this image deserves to be featured. {{User:Minda of Darkness/sig|alright, I might be sugar coating this a little}} 23:35, 22 August 2010 | Nintendo has described the graphical style of this game as "a painting coming to life", and who could argue? With its great quality and breathtaking view, this image deserves to be featured. {{User:Minda of Darkness/sig|alright, I might be sugar coating this a little}} 23:35, 22 August 2010 | ||
{{Support}} | {{Support}} | ||
Line 731: | Line 731: | ||
#I like how the picture is high quality. This deserves to be featured! --[[User:Zeldarules8|Zeldarules8]] 19:56, 28 December 2010 (EST) | #I like how the picture is high quality. This deserves to be featured! --[[User:Zeldarules8|Zeldarules8]] 19:56, 28 December 2010 (EST) | ||
#Yes. Yes. Like Alter stated, we don't have a lot of pictures of just scenery. It's very high quality, and reminds us of the joy of Skyward Sword we are to enjoy. This deserves to be featured! [[User:PreludeOfHeroes|PreludeOfHeroes]] 21:47, 25 January 2011 (EST) | #Yes. Yes. Like Alter stated, we don't have a lot of pictures of just scenery. It's very high quality, and reminds us of the joy of Skyward Sword we are to enjoy. This deserves to be featured! [[User:PreludeOfHeroes|PreludeOfHeroes]] 21:47, 25 January 2011 (EST) | ||
#I quite enjoy this image. Miyamoto-San's choice of graphic style is of course well made. The nostalgia I felt two years ago when watching 2 years ago are all the more real when I stare into this wonderful image. [[User:Steahl|Steahl]] 07:59, 10 November 2011 (EST) | #I quite enjoy this image. Miyamoto-San's choice of graphic style is of course well made. The nostalgia I felt two years ago when watching 2 years ago are all the more real when I stare into this wonderful image. [[User:Steahl@legacy41964522|Steahl]] 07:59, 10 November 2011 (EST) | ||
# (I love the style of skyward sword and it is a great representation of the new wave of nintendo games. This also reminds me of the W.W. storyline as I am playing, All the same it is a great image and a great way to bring zelda into the relm of the 21st century [[User:Gannondorf111|Gannondorf111]] 08:08, 21 November 2011 (EST) | # (I love the style of skyward sword and it is a great representation of the new wave of nintendo games. This also reminds me of the W.W. storyline as I am playing, All the same it is a great image and a great way to bring zelda into the relm of the 21st century [[User:Gannondorf111|Gannondorf111]] 08:08, 21 November 2011 (EST) | ||
{{Oppose}} | {{Oppose}} | ||
#As Cip predicted, there are now other [[:File:Faron Woods.png|similar images]] of Faron Woods, so nothing to really set this one apart. Also, there are plenty of other, arguably more interesting landscape shots from SS. I feel like the first image we feature from the game should be something more engaging and representative. {{:User: | #As Cip predicted, there are now other [[:File:SS Faron Woods.png|similar images]] of Faron Woods, so nothing to really set this one apart. Also, there are plenty of other, arguably more interesting landscape shots from SS. I feel like the first image we feature from the game should be something more engaging and representative. {{:User:Adam660@legacy41957735/sig}} 02:27, 28 February 2012 (EST) | ||
#Indeed. As beautiful as this picture is, I don't find it stands out from the many other awesome ''Skyward Sword'' landscapes. [[:File:Lake Floria.png|Lake Floria]], [[:File:Eldin Volcano.png|Eldin Volcano]], the [[:File:Ancient Cistern. | #Indeed. As beautiful as this picture is, I don't find it stands out from the many other awesome ''Skyward Sword'' landscapes. [[:File:SS Lake Floria.png|Lake Floria]], [[:File:SS Eldin Volcano.png|Eldin Volcano]], the [[:File:SS Ancient Cistern.png|Ancient Cistern]], and the [[:File:SS Fire Sanctuary.png|Fire Sanctuary]] are just a few examples. I wish we could just feature all of them! {{:User:Hylian King/sig}} 07:15, 29 February 2012 (EST) | ||
#The image isn't even sharp, it is dull, and there are already tons of images like this. Why this one? This is '''one''' image in a group of '''many''', and it's not that good anyway. I love ''Skyward Sword'' and I love Faron Woods, but I don't love this image. {{:User:Darkness/sig}} 00:15, 29 November 2012 (UTC) | #The image isn't even sharp, it is dull, and there are already tons of images like this. Why this one? This is '''one''' image in a group of '''many''', and it's not that good anyway. I love ''Skyward Sword'' and I love Faron Woods, but I don't love this image. {{:User:Darkness@legacy41966669/sig}} 00:15, 29 November 2012 (UTC) | ||
{{Neutral}} | {{Neutral}} | ||
#I have a strong feeling this image is going to end up being "one in a series", given the Cezanne-like landscape artstyle of ''Skyward Sword''. It wouldn't make any sense if this was the only landscape-like piece Nintendo cranks out in the ''Skyward Sword'' era because the image work is so brilliant. I'd just rather wait and see than to vote now. {{:User: | #I have a strong feeling this image is going to end up being "one in a series", given the Cezanne-like landscape artstyle of ''Skyward Sword''. It wouldn't make any sense if this was the only landscape-like piece Nintendo cranks out in the ''Skyward Sword'' era because the image work is so brilliant. I'd just rather wait and see than to vote now. {{:User:Cipriano/sig}} 19:06, 3 January 2011 (EST) | ||
{{negated}} | {{negated}} | ||
Line 755: | Line 755: | ||
[[File:Triforce.jpg|thumb|right|Artwork of the ''[[Triforce]]'' from {{ALttP}}]] | [[File:Triforce.jpg|thumb|right|Artwork of the ''[[Triforce]]'' from {{ALttP}}]] | ||
Very detailed, high-resolution image. Meets featured image criteria, as well as image quality standards. The image is also quite sharp. It also (of course) covers a Zelda-related subject, the ''[[Triforce]]''. -[[User:Cuddles|<span style="background-color: yellow; color: blue;">'''Cuddles'''</span>]] <sup><small>''([[User talk:Cuddles|Sit next door]])''</small></sup> 22:56, 11 July 2012 (EDT) | Very detailed, high-resolution image. Meets featured image criteria, as well as image quality standards. The image is also quite sharp. It also (of course) covers a Zelda-related subject, the ''[[Triforce]]''. -[[User:Cuddles@legacy41965837|<span style="background-color: yellow; color: blue;">'''Cuddles'''</span>]] <sup><small>''([[User talk:Cuddles@legacy41965837|Sit next door]])''</small></sup> 22:56, 11 July 2012 (EDT) | ||
{{Support}} | {{Support}} | ||
{{Oppose}} | {{Oppose}} | ||
#A lot of compression artifacts on this one. Out of all the images on the wiki, I don't think this one's in the top percentiles in terms of quality. {{:User:HelmarokKing/sig}} 21:47, 2 August 2012 (EDT) | #A lot of compression artifacts on this one. Out of all the images on the wiki, I don't think this one's in the top percentiles in terms of quality. {{:User:HelmarokKing/sig}} 21:47, 2 August 2012 (EDT) | ||
#Definitely not an amazing image. Fine, yes, but not perfect quality and size... it also seems kind of dull. {{:User:Darkness/sig}} 21:46, 9 December 2012 (UTC) | #Definitely not an amazing image. Fine, yes, but not perfect quality and size... it also seems kind of dull. {{:User:Darkness@legacy41966669/sig}} 21:46, 9 December 2012 (UTC) | ||
#I've always liked this image, something about the strange pseudo-religious quality and the colours. But unfortunately the quality of this scan just isn't good enough for me. And I fear that the original (wherever it was printed) is also of low enough quality that it'd be difficult to make anything that looks good enough. {{:User: | #I've always liked this image, something about the strange pseudo-religious quality and the colours. But unfortunately the quality of this scan just isn't good enough for me. And I fear that the original (wherever it was printed) is also of low enough quality that it'd be difficult to make anything that looks good enough. {{:User:Adam660@legacy41957735/sig}} 10:40, 20 December 2012 (UTC) | ||
{{Neutral}} | {{Neutral}} | ||
# It's definitely an interesting image, buuuut I'm not so sure about the quality of it... I doubt there is one with better quality floating around the internet, but if there is, I'd be more than glad to give this my support! --[[User:Dany36|Dany36]] 13:55, 12 July 2012 (EDT) | # It's definitely an interesting image, buuuut I'm not so sure about the quality of it... I doubt there is one with better quality floating around the internet, but if there is, I'd be more than glad to give this my support! --[[User:Dany36|Dany36]] 13:55, 12 July 2012 (EDT) | ||
Line 777: | Line 777: | ||
{{Oppose}} | {{Oppose}} | ||
#It's kind of interesting looking, I suppose, but I can't say I'm really happy with the idea of prominently showing high-resolution product images like this (since it's something other wikis specifically tend to steer away from for legal reasons). Aside from that vague concern, we already have quite a few WW images featured, two of which have Link and KoRL as their subject matter, so I don't really feel it helps the overall diversity. {{:User: | #It's kind of interesting looking, I suppose, but I can't say I'm really happy with the idea of prominently showing high-resolution product images like this (since it's something other wikis specifically tend to steer away from for legal reasons). Aside from that vague concern, we already have quite a few WW images featured, two of which have Link and KoRL as their subject matter, so I don't really feel it helps the overall diversity. {{:User:Adam660@legacy41957735/sig}} 03:05, 29 February 2012 (EST) | ||
#Adam's hit the nail on the head yet again. It does look cool, but we've got much better stuff than this.{{:User:Justin ZW/sig}} 19:16, 8 December 2012 (UTC) | #Adam's hit the nail on the head yet again. It does look cool, but we've got much better stuff than this.{{:User:Justin ZW/sig}} 19:16, 8 December 2012 (UTC) | ||
#The picture itself is okay, but the brand name and text detracts from the picture. It would look less cluttered if the text wasn't there,but the image itself is also messy. {{:User:Darkness/sig}} 19:03, 26 November 2012 (UTC) | #The picture itself is okay, but the brand name and text detracts from the picture. It would look less cluttered if the text wasn't there,but the image itself is also messy. {{:User:Darkness@legacy41966669/sig}} 19:03, 26 November 2012 (UTC) | ||
#I'm with Darkness. It has a pretty cool effect, but the text and branding make it look messy.{{:User: | #I'm with Darkness. It has a pretty cool effect, but the text and branding make it look messy.{{:User:Abdullah5599@legacy41961806/sig}} 16:06, 20 December 2012 (UTC) | ||
#I also have to unfortunately for the above reasons, and also I'd like to repeat what Adam said, we have quite a large number of Wind Waker artworks in the featured section already. We need more from other games, particularly earlier ones. {{:User:Fizzle8094/sig}} 10:37, 5 January 2013 (UTC) | #I also have to unfortunately for the above reasons, and also I'd like to repeat what Adam said, we have quite a large number of Wind Waker artworks in the featured section already. We need more from other games, particularly earlier ones. {{:User:Fizzle8094@legacy41964097/sig}} 10:37, 5 January 2013 (UTC) | ||
#As has been said before, legal reasons, image messiness. A good photo, but with adjustments I don't know how to do, it would be a great photo.[[User:Ankazar|Ankazar]] 20:23, 15 March 2013 (UTC) | #As has been said before, legal reasons, image messiness. A good photo, but with adjustments I don't know how to do, it would be a great photo.[[User:Ankazar|Ankazar]] 20:23, 15 March 2013 (UTC) | ||
{{Neutral}} | {{Neutral}} | ||
Line 789: | Line 789: | ||
{{hide | {{hide | ||
|header=[[:File: | |header=[[:File:User Ankazar.png]] Master Sword Fan Art — Failed on March 16, 2013 | ||
|content= | |content= | ||
*Score: -3 | *Score: -3 | ||
Line 795: | Line 795: | ||
{{Support}} | {{Support}} | ||
{{Oppose}} | {{Oppose}} | ||
#I'm sorry, but this looks like it's fan art. It shouldn't be used on this wiki except for user pages without the creator's permission. It's fine to keep it on your userpage, though. {{:User:Darkness/sig}} 15:21, 16 March 2013 (UTC) | #I'm sorry, but this looks like it's fan art. It shouldn't be used on this wiki except for user pages without the creator's permission. It's fine to keep it on your userpage, though. {{:User:Darkness@legacy41966669/sig}} 15:21, 16 March 2013 (UTC) | ||
#Darkness is right. We really haven't allowed fan art to be featured in the past, and I really don't think it's something we should start doing. {{:User: | #Darkness is right. We really haven't allowed fan art to be featured in the past, and I really don't think it's something we should start doing. {{:User:TriforceTony/sig}} 15:24, 16 March 2013 (UTC) | ||
#Agreed for reasons already stated. --[[User:Dany36|Dany36]] 15:59, 16 March 2013 (UTC) | #Agreed for reasons already stated. --[[User:Dany36|Dany36]] 15:59, 16 March 2013 (UTC) | ||
{{Neutral}} | {{Neutral}} | ||
Line 802: | Line 802: | ||
{{hide | {{hide | ||
|header=[[:File: | |header=[[:File:Zelda HD Experience Link.png]] (Link in the [[Zelda HD Experience]]) — Failed on March 17, 2013 | ||
|content= | |content= | ||
[[File: | [[File:Zelda HD Experience Link.png|thumb|right|400px]] | ||
I thought that this would be a great nomination because this is the first glimpse of Link in the upcoming WiiU Zelda game! Again, vote as you see fit. [[User:Ankazar|Ankazar]] 01:28, 17 March 2013 (UTC) | I thought that this would be a great nomination because this is the first glimpse of Link in the upcoming WiiU Zelda game! Again, vote as you see fit. [[User:Ankazar|Ankazar]] 01:28, 17 March 2013 (UTC) | ||
*Score: -3 | *Score: -3 | ||
{{Support}} | {{Support}} | ||
{{Oppose}} | {{Oppose}} | ||
#While I think it's an impressive and beautiful image, I don't think it quite captures the state of grandeur typical to Feautured Pictures. {{:User: | #While I think it's an impressive and beautiful image, I don't think it quite captures the state of grandeur typical to Feautured Pictures. {{:User:TriforceTony/sig}} 06:36, 17 March 2013 (UTC) | ||
#If we had an image from the HD Experience demo, it'd be much better to include the one of Link fighting Armogohma. While I love Link's model in this, it is essentially just an HD version of his Twilight Princess and Brawl appearance, and not really that worthy of a featured image, although it does have nice lighting. {{:User:Fizzle8094/sig}} 18:25, 17 March 2013 (UTC) | #If we had an image from the HD Experience demo, it'd be much better to include the one of Link fighting Armogohma. While I love Link's model in this, it is essentially just an HD version of his Twilight Princess and Brawl appearance, and not really that worthy of a featured image, although it does have nice lighting. {{:User:Fizzle8094@legacy41964097/sig}} 18:25, 17 March 2013 (UTC) | ||
#This image doesn't seem very impressive to me. The lighting is quite nice, but that's about it. There isn't really anything about this image that's particularly amazing or notable; it's just Link ''standing'' there, and it's slightly blurry too. I agree with Fizzle; it'd be far better if we were to feature one of the images of Link fighting Armogohma. Furthermore, we're likely to see much better images in the future when Zelda Wii U is actually released, so we might as well wait until then before we take any action. {{:User:Dannyboy601/sig}} 21:09, 17 March 2013 (UTC) | #This image doesn't seem very impressive to me. The lighting is quite nice, but that's about it. There isn't really anything about this image that's particularly amazing or notable; it's just Link ''standing'' there, and it's slightly blurry too. I agree with Fizzle; it'd be far better if we were to feature one of the images of Link fighting Armogohma. Furthermore, we're likely to see much better images in the future when Zelda Wii U is actually released, so we might as well wait until then before we take any action. {{:User:Dannyboy601@legacy41964100/sig}} 21:09, 17 March 2013 (UTC) | ||
{{Neutral}} | {{Neutral}} | ||
#This image does appear slightly blurry and small. However, the style of the game/demo does make this image stand out. The graphical style, which resembles a mix of ''Twilight Princess'' and ''Skyward Sword'' has both dimension and beauty. While I don't think this image is worth being featured, it's still amazing. {{:User:Darkness/sig}} 14:22, 17 March 2013 (UTC) | #This image does appear slightly blurry and small. However, the style of the game/demo does make this image stand out. The graphical style, which resembles a mix of ''Twilight Princess'' and ''Skyward Sword'' has both dimension and beauty. While I don't think this image is worth being featured, it's still amazing. {{:User:Darkness@legacy41966669/sig}} 14:22, 17 March 2013 (UTC) | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{hide | {{hide | ||
Line 826: | Line 826: | ||
{{Support}} | {{Support}} | ||
{{Oppose}} | {{Oppose}} | ||
#This image is too low-quality. If we had a high resolution version of this image, I would be all for it. Also, your description seems to imply that you've edited it. It's no secret that I'm deftly against editing images for the wiki beyond making them transparent, so that another resolute "no" from me. {{:User: | #This image is too low-quality. If we had a high resolution version of this image, I would be all for it. Also, your description seems to imply that you've edited it. It's no secret that I'm deftly against editing images for the wiki beyond making them transparent, so that another resolute "no" from me. {{:User:TriforceTony/sig}} 20:45, 19 March 2013 (UTC) | ||
#I have to agree with Pakkun, here. The image is way too low-res for me to give my support. After all, it's supposed to be a game with HD visuals (that was the whole point of the demo), and a pixellated, low-res image is not a good way to depict that.{{:User:Justin ZW/sig}} 21:20, 19 March 2013 (UTC) | #I have to agree with Pakkun, here. The image is way too low-res for me to give my support. After all, it's supposed to be a game with HD visuals (that was the whole point of the demo), and a pixellated, low-res image is not a good way to depict that.{{:User:Justin ZW/sig}} 21:20, 19 March 2013 (UTC) | ||
#I agree with everything else that's been said. The image is way too low res to pass as a featured image and it's also small and blurry. The colors blend In some areas, making the image look more like a gray splotch. I think that [[:File:Zelda Wii U Tech Demo.jpg|this image]] is a much better choice as a featured image featuring the same subject. {{:User:Darkness/sig}} 00:48, 21 March 2013 (UTC) | #I agree with everything else that's been said. The image is way too low res to pass as a featured image and it's also small and blurry. The colors blend In some areas, making the image look more like a gray splotch. I think that [[:File:Zelda Wii U Tech Demo.jpg|this image]] is a much better choice as a featured image featuring the same subject. {{:User:Darkness@legacy41966669/sig}} 00:48, 21 March 2013 (UTC) | ||
{{Neutral}} | {{Neutral}} | ||
}} | }} | ||
Line 843: | Line 843: | ||
#While the picture is definitely impressive and detailed, the problem is that we don't have any information yet about the graphical style of the game, so I think it is a bit premature to include it at this point. [[User:Zeldafan1982|Zeldafan1982]] 22:54, 20 March 2013 (UTC) | #While the picture is definitely impressive and detailed, the problem is that we don't have any information yet about the graphical style of the game, so I think it is a bit premature to include it at this point. [[User:Zeldafan1982|Zeldafan1982]] 22:54, 20 March 2013 (UTC) | ||
#I agree with Zeldafan. It's a cool picture, but it doesn't really strike me as "interesting," considering that we know nothing about the game. Hey, as far we know, this might not even be ''in'' the game. Tech demos have a fun way of just throwing together something for the sake of showcasing new stuff. It would be more prudent to wait for actual information about the game.{{:User:Justin ZW/sig}} 12:55, 22 March 2013 (UTC) | #I agree with Zeldafan. It's a cool picture, but it doesn't really strike me as "interesting," considering that we know nothing about the game. Hey, as far we know, this might not even be ''in'' the game. Tech demos have a fun way of just throwing together something for the sake of showcasing new stuff. It would be more prudent to wait for actual information about the game.{{:User:Justin ZW/sig}} 12:55, 22 March 2013 (UTC) | ||
#Yeah I agree that it's a bad idea to include beta and preview images; plenty of examples [[Beta_Content|here]] of the kind of stuff that doesn't make it into final releases, so not the ideal thing to be featuring. {{:User: | #Yeah I agree that it's a bad idea to include beta and preview images; plenty of examples [[Beta_Content|here]] of the kind of stuff that doesn't make it into final releases, so not the ideal thing to be featuring. {{:User:Adam660@legacy41957735/sig}} 14:24, 29 April 2013 (UTC) | ||
{{Neutral}} | {{Neutral}} | ||
#Well, I personally don't think that this is "symbolic". The new HD Zelda we know nothing about, so it might be much less realistic. It does, however, show the Wii U's potential, and the image itself is high-quality. Every tiny detail, from the patterns on the torches to the markings on Armogohma's legs, adds contrast to this image. There is an amazing use of shadow and dimension in this image, with every aspect of it standing clearly on a different layer. It's also extremely high resolution. {{:User:Darkness/sig}} 12:30, 22 March 2013 (UTC) | #Well, I personally don't think that this is "symbolic". The new HD Zelda we know nothing about, so it might be much less realistic. It does, however, show the Wii U's potential, and the image itself is high-quality. Every tiny detail, from the patterns on the torches to the markings on Armogohma's legs, adds contrast to this image. There is an amazing use of shadow and dimension in this image, with every aspect of it standing clearly on a different layer. It's also extremely high resolution. {{:User:Darkness@legacy41966669/sig}} 12:30, 22 March 2013 (UTC) | ||
}} | }} | ||
Line 852: | Line 852: | ||
header=[[:File:TWW HD.jpg]] (The Wind Waker HD Screenshot)| | header=[[:File:TWW HD.jpg]] (The Wind Waker HD Screenshot)| | ||
content= | content= | ||
This image is amazing. It's not only very large and bright, but the colors are vibrant and soft. The realistic shading and reflection effects add to the image. The clouds look beautiful, and so do the detailed textures. You have to look at it in full resolution to see the detail put into the screenshot. There are a series of similar images that are all worthy of being featured, but this one is the best. {{:User:Darkness/sig}} 16:21, 17 March 2013 (UTC) | This image is amazing. It's not only very large and bright, but the colors are vibrant and soft. The realistic shading and reflection effects add to the image. The clouds look beautiful, and so do the detailed textures. You have to look at it in full resolution to see the detail put into the screenshot. There are a series of similar images that are all worthy of being featured, but this one is the best. {{:User:Darkness@legacy41966669/sig}} 16:21, 17 March 2013 (UTC) | ||
[[File:TWW HD.jpg|400px|thumb|right]] | [[File:TWW HD.jpg|400px|thumb|right]] | ||
Final score: -4 | Final score: -4 | ||
Line 859: | Line 859: | ||
#This picture IS great! I took a look at the full resolution photo, and everything you said is right! And this is a WiiU remake? If all the Zelda stuff looks this good on the WiiU, we have found ourselves a new major console. [[User:Ankazar|Ankazar]] 16:57, 17 March 2013 (UTC) | #This picture IS great! I took a look at the full resolution photo, and everything you said is right! And this is a WiiU remake? If all the Zelda stuff looks this good on the WiiU, we have found ourselves a new major console. [[User:Ankazar|Ankazar]] 16:57, 17 March 2013 (UTC) | ||
{{Oppose}} | {{Oppose}} | ||
#It's not a bad shot, but we have no idea if the final game will look anything like this as this is pretty much the earliest we're seeing it. It's also kind of barren looking, as it's just the island with the new HD lighting style and not much else. We have a lot of Wind Waker images already and I much prefer art to screenshots, also. We're bound to get WAY more impressive Wind Waker WiiU images than this one, so it seems like jumping the gun. {{:User:Fizzle8094/sig}} 18:25, 17 March 2013 (UTC) | #It's not a bad shot, but we have no idea if the final game will look anything like this as this is pretty much the earliest we're seeing it. It's also kind of barren looking, as it's just the island with the new HD lighting style and not much else. We have a lot of Wind Waker images already and I much prefer art to screenshots, also. We're bound to get WAY more impressive Wind Waker WiiU images than this one, so it seems like jumping the gun. {{:User:Fizzle8094@legacy41964097/sig}} 18:25, 17 March 2013 (UTC) | ||
#I'm with Fizzle on this one. I think I would personally prefer a high-resolution panoramic screenshot of the original TWW to this, anyway. {{:User:Hylian King/sig}} 22:41, 17 March 2013 (UTC) | #I'm with Fizzle on this one. I think I would personally prefer a high-resolution panoramic screenshot of the original TWW to this, anyway. {{:User:Hylian King/sig}} 22:41, 17 March 2013 (UTC) | ||
#I'd say news-worthy, but IMO not feature-worthy. Overall I think we'd be better off waiting until the game is released in a couple of months time, when I'm sure we can get some much more impressive in-game images. {{:User: | #I'd say news-worthy, but IMO not feature-worthy. Overall I think we'd be better off waiting until the game is released in a couple of months time, when I'm sure we can get some much more impressive in-game images. {{:User:Adam660@legacy41957735/sig}} 10:30, 12 June 2013 (UTC) | ||
{{Neutral}} | {{Neutral}} | ||
#I'm not too sure about this one. I think it's a very nice image, especially with the HD style. It's also quite a good panoramic; it's taken at an interesting angle and beautifully depicts such an iconic location. However, it does seem rather unpolished. There aren't any ripples or waves on the sea, making the water appear bland and the shadows of the clouds sharp. Also the glow effect leaves a lot to be desired. {{:User:Dannyboy601/sig}} 23:27, 17 March 2013 (UTC) | #I'm not too sure about this one. I think it's a very nice image, especially with the HD style. It's also quite a good panoramic; it's taken at an interesting angle and beautifully depicts such an iconic location. However, it does seem rather unpolished. There aren't any ripples or waves on the sea, making the water appear bland and the shadows of the clouds sharp. Also the glow effect leaves a lot to be desired. {{:User:Dannyboy601@legacy41964100/sig}} 23:27, 17 March 2013 (UTC) | ||
#This is a nice shot, but the bloom effect seems a tad overdone. Also, as Danny said, it seems unfinished. While it wouldn't necessarily be a bad thing to feature, I feel like we'd just get something higher quality later on down the line.{{:User:Justin ZW/sig}} 21:58, 5 May 2013 (UTC) | #This is a nice shot, but the bloom effect seems a tad overdone. Also, as Danny said, it seems unfinished. While it wouldn't necessarily be a bad thing to feature, I feel like we'd just get something higher quality later on down the line.{{:User:Justin ZW/sig}} 21:58, 5 May 2013 (UTC) | ||
Line 871: | Line 871: | ||
header=[[:File:ALBW Hyrule Lorule.png]] (A Link Between Worlds Artwork) — Failed on June 14, 2014 (expired)| | header=[[:File:ALBW Hyrule Lorule.png]] (A Link Between Worlds Artwork) — Failed on June 14, 2014 (expired)| | ||
content= | content= | ||
This is an absolutely beautiful piece of artwork from the upcoming A Link Between Worlds. With it's vivid colors and peaceful, yet dramatic, depiction of [[Hyrule Castle]] I think that it's definitely feature worthy. {{:User: | This is an absolutely beautiful piece of artwork from the upcoming A Link Between Worlds. With it's vivid colors and peaceful, yet dramatic, depiction of [[Hyrule Castle]] I think that it's definitely feature worthy. {{:User:Mandi2517@legacy41958928/sig}} 05:40, 24 October 2013 (UTC) | ||
[[File:ALBW Hyrule Lorule.png|400px|thumb|right]] | [[File:ALBW Hyrule Lorule.png|400px|thumb|right]] | ||
Final score: 6 | Final score: 6 | ||
{{Support}} | {{Support}} | ||
#I personally think this shows the contrast of the two world well. --[[User:Planetbox|Planetbox]] ([[User talk:Planetbox|talk]]) 17:45, 27 October 2013 (UTC) | #I personally think this shows the contrast of the two world well. --[[User:Planetbox@legacy41964341|Planetbox]] ([[User talk:Planetbox@legacy41964341|talk]]) 17:45, 27 October 2013 (UTC) | ||
#It's definitely the art piece I think will stand out from the rest for this game, very visually pleasing. - [[User: | #It's definitely the art piece I think will stand out from the rest for this game, very visually pleasing. - [[User:Bwar1133@legacy41958018|Bwar]] ([[User talk:Bwar1133@legacy41958018|talk]]) 16:00, 12 November 2013 (UTC) | ||
#This artwork is not only a spectacular, high quality piece of art, but is also representative of the game's major themes and is therefore feature worthy in my opinion. {{:User:HelmarokKing/sig}} 03:00, 19 December 2013 (UTC) | #This artwork is not only a spectacular, high quality piece of art, but is also representative of the game's major themes and is therefore feature worthy in my opinion. {{:User:HelmarokKing/sig}} 03:00, 19 December 2013 (UTC) | ||
# I believe that this piece of artwork shows how Lorule is just a flip of how Hyrule is built up. --[[User:Infernap|Infernap]] ([[User talk:Infernap|talk]]) 13:28, 19 December 2013 (UTC) | # I believe that this piece of artwork shows how Lorule is just a flip of how Hyrule is built up. --[[User:Infernap|Infernap]] ([[User talk:Infernap|talk]]) 13:28, 19 December 2013 (UTC) | ||
# Beautiful artwork, emphasizing the dichotomy between Hyrule and Lorule. The color choices are excellent, too - the vibrant greens of Hyrule contrast well with the stagnant, dark purples and yellows of Lorule. [[User:Wwtoonlinkfan|wwtoonlinkfan]] ([[User talk:Wwtoonlinkfan|talk]]) 11:09, 12 January 2014 (UTC) | # Beautiful artwork, emphasizing the dichotomy between Hyrule and Lorule. The color choices are excellent, too - the vibrant greens of Hyrule contrast well with the stagnant, dark purples and yellows of Lorule. [[User:Wwtoonlinkfan|wwtoonlinkfan]] ([[User talk:Wwtoonlinkfan|talk]]) 11:09, 12 January 2014 (UTC) | ||
# I really do love this picture. The reflection of Lorule really enforces the mood of the game. It still graces my desktop well. [[User:WilliamLC|William]] ([[ | # I really do love this picture. The reflection of Lorule really enforces the mood of the game. It still graces my desktop well. [[User:WilliamLC|William]] ([[User talk:WilliamLC|Talk]]) 19:55, 26 May 2014 (UTC) | ||
{{Oppose}} | {{Oppose}} | ||
{{Neutral}} | {{Neutral}} | ||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 20:20, 28 April 2024
Failed Picture Nominations
The following sections are picture nominations which either expired or received a score of -3.