Talk:Keaton

From Zelda Wiki, the Zelda encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Do you think we should put the keaton questions on this article? RupeeLord 01:47, 22 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Well, I put them there. Of course, if you all agree for the removal, it can be removed. ZW is here for information. What would the Keaton page be without its Keaton questions?User:Austin/sig 04:40, 22 February 2009 (UTC)


I mean put the actual questions on the page, or in their own article. User:RupeeLord/sig 16:13, 2 May 2009 (UTC)



What about the keatons of A Link to the Past? User:RupeeLord/sig 01:19, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

There are Keatons in ALttP? Where? O_o Dany36 01:41, 11 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
There's 'Keatons' in Thieve's Town... The Kakariko village of Dark World. Edit: Fail for not leaving signature. - AtrumLevis  (My Talk Page) (My Contributions) 01:45, 11 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Also in the Village of Outcasts User:RupeeLord/sig 01:50, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
^I think that's what she's referring to. XD And anyway, I guess they should be added, then! Anyone want to volunteer? :P Dany36 01:51, 11 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Split The Minish Cap section into its own page

Should we split The Minish Cap section? I must admit that it's kind of awkward having a page for both an enemy and a peaceful race/character. For those concerned about the size of the page, I've written up a mock article on my Sandbox. There's also an example of what this page will look like if it is split here. User:Pakkun/sig 20:13, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

That doesn't seem like a bad idea; the enemy and the species are very different after all. Splitting the page would be logical and I can't see any reason not to. Also, the two pages would each contain a decent amount of information. I say go ahead. Dannyboy601Talk 21:25, 17 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
+1 support for a split. They're really the same in name only. Embyr 75  --Talk-- 21:41, 17 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]