Talk:Clothes: Difference between revisions

From Zelda Wiki, the Zelda encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
Line 25: Line 25:
::Well if you want to be technical about it most of the things on there aren't even "tunics" so i think the Engineer's clothes should be included [[User:Kiotaa|Kiotaa]] 12:02, 4 February 2011 (EST)
::Well if you want to be technical about it most of the things on there aren't even "tunics" so i think the Engineer's clothes should be included [[User:Kiotaa|Kiotaa]] 12:02, 4 February 2011 (EST)
:::Good point. I retract my statement.{{:User:Justin/sig}} 13:18, 4 February 2011 (EST)
:::Good point. I retract my statement.{{:User:Justin/sig}} 13:18, 4 February 2011 (EST)
== Reorganization ==
The template refers to the obscene amount of images in the body of the article. This would be a simple reorganization - we need to take inventory of the necessary images, or the most detailed/significant to each section, and strategically place them so that the article looks presentable, not disjointed and sloppy! For example, look to the [[Leever]], [[Blade Trap]], or [[Shiekah]] articles for inspiration - those articles expertly place pictures to attract the reader while staying relevant to the information nearby. {{:User:Cipriano/sig}} 10:42, 22 November 2011 (EST)

Revision as of 15:42, 22 November 2011

tunic

how do you get the red tunic in twilight princes

This is not the place to ask these kinds of questions. Try GameFAQs.com. --The Keeper of Majora's Mask 23:03, 20 April 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

There is no red tunic in Twilight Princess -- Twilightinthedark

Do you mean the Magic Armor?

links awakening

?? I don't remember the tunics having negative effects in Links Awakening....--Magnus orion 17:15, 6 March 2008 (EST)

Well, I double checked and I was right the LA tunics don't have negative effects. Tested it. So I'm editing the article--Magnus orion 20:32, 27 March 2008 (EDT)

I added a glitched "damage tunic" to the Link's Awakening portion - thoughts?

I have tested and confirmed that this tunic does exist, and that the method of obtaining it works. But because it is a glitch, should be be organized with the other three tunics? It lasts even after a save&quit, and shows an icon on the menu screen, so it IS a tunic, just not one that was intended by the creators to be in the game. Template:Nosig

It fits better in the Glitches page. I'll move it. ;) Also, please don't forget to sign your comments with four tildes as such: ~~~~ Thanks! Dany36 18:12, 18 October 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Should the Engineer's clothes be in the Tunic page?

Basically what the title says. Should they? It's not really a tunic, so I'm wondering if it should be split off into its own page. It just...sort of sticks out. Thoughts? Dany36 23:14, 12 January 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Fraid not. The engineer's clothing is not a tunic. It's just clothes.Justin(Talk) 23:16, 12 January 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Well if you want to be technical about it most of the things on there aren't even "tunics" so i think the Engineer's clothes should be included Kiotaa 12:02, 4 February 2011 (EST)
Good point. I retract my statement.User:Justin/sig 13:18, 4 February 2011 (EST)

Reorganization

The template refers to the obscene amount of images in the body of the article. This would be a simple reorganization - we need to take inventory of the necessary images, or the most detailed/significant to each section, and strategically place them so that the article looks presentable, not disjointed and sloppy! For example, look to the Leever, Blade Trap, or Shiekah articles for inspiration - those articles expertly place pictures to attract the reader while staying relevant to the information nearby. — ciprianotalk 10:42, 22 November 2011 (EST)