Talk:Dodongo: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
(→Citations: new section) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
I found it on another Zelda site. I forgot where. But I made it from a png to a gif (don't worry the image quality remained intact) and made it transparent.-- [[User:Green_Tunic|Green_Tunic]] ([[User talk:Green_Tunic|Talk]]) 01:52, 26 March 2009 (UTC) | I found it on another Zelda site. I forgot where. But I made it from a png to a gif (don't worry the image quality remained intact) and made it transparent.-- [[User:Green_Tunic|Green_Tunic]] ([[User talk:Green_Tunic|Talk]]) 01:52, 26 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
== Citations == | |||
How does one ''really'' cite information that we can simply observe in game? I mean the only way I think that this can be addressed it to find questionable statements and mark them with the Fact template, indicating that a particular statement needs to be cited because it's not simply accepted. I just think the References template at the top is a bit, no pun intended, over the top. --[[User:Xizor|Xizor]] 04:13, 25 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 04:13, 25 September 2009
I switched the images
I think it's a better representation of the Dodongo in Twilight Princess because it's in a natural pose. Also it's transparent so I think that's a plus. Is everyone okay with the decision?-- Green_Tunic (Talk) 02:04, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
Yea, I think the Picture is MUCH better. Where did you find it? Or did you make it yourself? DekuLink 05:27, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
- Yes. The new image looks much more professional.User:Mandi/sig 06:02, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
I found it on another Zelda site. I forgot where. But I made it from a png to a gif (don't worry the image quality remained intact) and made it transparent.-- Green_Tunic (Talk) 01:52, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
Citations
How does one really cite information that we can simply observe in game? I mean the only way I think that this can be addressed it to find questionable statements and mark them with the Fact template, indicating that a particular statement needs to be cited because it's not simply accepted. I just think the References template at the top is a bit, no pun intended, over the top. --Xizor 04:13, 25 September 2009 (UTC)