User talk:Christopher-gpuser: Difference between revisions

From Zelda Wiki, the Zelda encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
m (Cipriano Username Change)
 
(35 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Archives|User|Archive 1|Archive 2}}{{clear}}
{{user activeness|Banned}}
{{Archive List|3}}


== References ==
==Link Page==
Chris, that comment was neither productive or necessary. Again, this is the kind of verbal harrassment that can get you banned. We all know that any reference you are making to "many months ago" is in accordance with your own work being criticized for heavy verbosity and narrative-like writing, both of which we still take a stand against today. The discussion had since been concluded before you arrived, so please refrain from provoking any further argument on this topic. Thanks! Nice to see you back around, even if it was only momentarily. {{:User:Cipriano/sig}} 19:27, 15 September 2010 (EDT)
:'Making false excuse for the incompetencies of others means nothing to me Cip. And worthless threats of banning have no effect on me, b/c in case you didn't read it, I want nothing to do with this place, and abusive unwarranted abuses of power like said threats are exactly why. So ban me and see if I really care. I've done nothing but make my opinion known, which leaves no legitimacy for any threats to stand upon. This place reeks of hypocrisy anyway, and we both know the real arguments months ago were the same ones here. Personally it's good to hear from you, but carry these words back to all the hypocrites. I told all of you so. [[User:Christopher-gpuser|Link87]] 20:21, 15 September 2010 (EDT)
::I'm sorry you feel that way. I wish you luck in any future endeavor you may have. {{:User:Cipriano/sig}} 20:33, 15 September 2010 (EDT)


Hey Chris! Just wanted to let you know that I finally got started on the Hyrule Landmarks references. :D It might take me a while to get them all done, but just know that I'll eventually finish them up and then start on the references for Zant's Invasion of Hyrule article and all of its subarticles. So, yeah, don't think I've forgotten about those pages! ;p [[User:Dany36|Dany36]] 18:24, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
:I'm sorry to seem rigid or harsh, but after the biased and unfair attacks on me and illegitimate bans, i'm fed up with some of the so-called "staff" after they did nothing to rein in the spoiled brat who thought he was God and attacked me while embracing his position of no responsibility and treating his power like a "do-whatever-I-want-and-get-away-with-it badge". It's blatantly obvious they did so simply with bias toward me now. Here they are seven months later embracing every argument I made against him back then. Blatant hypocrisy. Had the "staff" done their duty and rejected bias, this fiasco of late would have been resolved a LONG time ago. I personally have nothing against you and respect you, but I have no respect or sympathy for the hypocrites, and they know who they are. Until Zeldawiki cleans house, I want nothing more to do with it. [[User:Christopher-gpuser|Link87]] 21:09, 15 September 2010 (EDT)
:That's great to hear Dany, I'm glad to hear progress is being made on the pages. I'm still in the process of writing Zant's Invasion of Hyrule, but I've been so busy lately with school it's been exhausting. I will finish it soon though, and then it will be on to the next project, lol. But thank you for helping with the sources, I greatly appreciate it. Talk to you soon. ;) [[User:Christopher|Link87]] 14:15, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
==Hyrule Article==
I think I should involve you with the changes I'm making to the article. Seeing that you've put so much time/effort/debate into it. The cuts you'll see is good writing, don't think I'm saying it isn't, but a paste job to the main race pages would be an apt solution for all. If I do all of this well enough, the locations could easily be worked back in. I'd rather discuss the finer points with you on skype since talk pages here fill up so bad :P {{:User:Axiomist/sig}} 02:40, 6 October 2009 (UTC)


:I see what you mean, and yes I can chat on Skype. Sorry I would have been on sooner had I known. I'm on now. [[User:Christopher|Link87]] 04:01, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
==Last note on the ban==
 
I just want to let you know that this ban was backed with full staff support. I understand that this movement may not faze you in the least. Your behavioral conduct on this wiki is, and has been unacceptable. We cannot let the users, let alone the future users of this wiki stand to be intimidated by you any longer. Perhaps we, the staff, made mistakes in the past, and continue to make them, but that is no reason to cyber-bully anyone. It is unfortunate that it has come to this, but the admin staff feels that this action was in the best interest of the wiki. Again, I wish you luck in all of your future endeavors. {{:User:Cipriano/sig}} 19:52, 16 September 2010 (EDT)
==Hey Man!==
 
(Sorry if you're not who I think you are.) Hey man! It's me, Mr kmil! How's it going! I see that you migrated from ZP over here. Maybe you'll get treated better over here? I miss your edits, and everything's going pretty well on ZP. Give me a response, maybe we can catch up a little.
[[User:Mr kmil, knight of Zeldapedia|Mr kmil]]
:Hey man, I apologize if I'm unsure who you're referring to; I did subscribe to ZP once briefly, but I didn't have many major dealings there, apart from typical edits. But I think I may remember seeing or talking to you there too, I'm glad to hear things are going well for you. [[User:Christopher|Link87]] 19:54, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
Did you not have an account over on Zeldapedia named "Hero of Time87"? If not I'm sorry, because I mistook you for someone else.
[[USer:Mr kmil, knight of Zeldapedia|Mr kmil]] 17:26, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
:No, I did not have a screen name like that, mine was just a generic one like the one I have here. I knew of the guy you're talking about, but not that well. I did leave however for the same reasons he seemingly did, for poor leadership and clashes with the regime there. I don't know what became of your friend, but I talked to him off and on. I believe I also may have talked to you once or twice now that I think of it, so it is nice to hear from you again no less my friend. I don't even remember exactly what my name was for sure back there, it was "Link" and some number, but I dissolved it voluntarily upon my migration to Zelda Wiki. [[User:Christopher|Link87]] 22:37, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
Alright, sorry for the mistake.
[[USer:Mr kmil, knight of Zeldapedia|Mr kmil]] 22:40, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
:No worries man, like I said I am glad to hear from you again no less. If you ever get on Skype sometime, look me up and we can perhaps chat more there. I hope all's going well for you. [[User:Christopher|Link87]] 22:45, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
 
==Sheikah Page==
Looks like you're going to overhaul the Sheikah page next. One thing I noticed is that you had "Sheikah" written out in Hylian, but it was black, a little hard to read on the dark blue backgrounds. Most other pages that have Hylian text in them use white font. Maybe we can work on that page like with the [[Imprisoning War]] page? [[User:Ganondorfdude11|Ganondorfdude11]] 23:29, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
:That was exactly my thought, I just had to get off quickly so I could get to a Psych exam and forgot to message you before I left. That'd be great, some help on an article as big as this one will be. [[User:Christopher|Link87]] 00:43, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
 
== Excellent work! ==
I just have to say that your work on the Sheikah article with Ganondorfdude11 is excellent so far, despite your frequent clashes with the admins over other articles. I look forward to possibly collaborating with your strong work ethic in the future. =) {{:User:Cipriano 119/sig}} 04:55, 26 October 2009
:Why thank you sir or maam, I apologize for not knowing which as I am still getting to know everyone. And yes, I would love to collaborate with you on future projects as well and perhaps even solicit your help on the current Sheikah article as well. I am deeply humbled by your kind words, and I will continue to give my best effort to make the articles as informative and interesting as I possibly can. Thanks again! ;) [[User:Christopher|Link87]] 05:14, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
:By the way, do you ever get on Skype?? [[User:Christopher|Link87]] 05:15, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
::Even though my sig is purple/pink, I'm a dude, just did that to differentiate from the other signatues already here. And as far as skype goes, I don't have an account yet, but probably be getting one soon. I'll hit you up! {{:User:Cipriano 119/sig}} 18:42, 26 October 2009
:::I see man, cool cool. Well I look forward to hearing from you then! ;) [[User:Christopher|Link87]] 00:37, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
::::It's been awhile, but I'm on Skype now =) {{:User:Cipriano 119/sig}} 04:04, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
:::::Ah, wonderful man! What's your s/n on there and I'll add you to my list. [[User:Christopher|Link87]] 04:26, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
 
== Edits ==
 
The multiple, consecutive page edits have got to stop. It floods the recent changes '''and''' the page histories. Not to mention is highly annoying and difficult to patrol. It's not very hard to click ''show preview''. I mean, several edits to the same page are understandable but 20-30 is just ridiculous.{{:User:Mandi/sig}} 19:50, November 1, 2009 (UTC)
 
:Although Mandi put that somewhat too bluntly from my liking, it's a valid point and one that I hope you'll take on board. For myself, and I'm sure for others as well, it's a matter of pride to make changes in as few edits as possible. We do this out of courtesy to the many others who use the Recent Changes daily, and to the dedicated staff team who work hard to ensure that every edit here at ZW is checked and verified. A number of things can help with this, including planning all the information you'd like to add, using a spellchecker and editing the whole article rather than using the section edit links. Also, I can't urge you strongly enough to compose large edits in a text-based document on your computer before posting; not only does this help with the problem of multiple edits, but you protect yourself accidentally from losing unsaved work. {{:User:Adam/sig}} 20:41, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
 
::I will ignore Mandi's rudeness under the understanding that she has not always been known to be polite to users. On the other hand, I greatly appreciate your respectful and moderate tone Adam, and I agree with what you are saying wholeheartedly. I apologize to you if there have been a lot of edits, part of the reason for that was that GD11 and I were working on separate sections at the same time, and we had edit conflicts as a result b/c he was working on one section while I was working on the other unbeknownst to me for a while. So I shall indeed try to scale down the edits as best I can in future, it's actually been better lately, it was just last night we happened to be working on the same article at the same time and I didn't realize we were both going to be editing for as long as we did. So thank you Adam, and I will indeed keep what you have said in mind and adhere to it to the best of my ability. [[User:Christopher|Link87]] 23:17, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
 
==:)==
I'm happy to see that my [[Trinity of Truth]] article has helped you in your revamp of the [[Sheikah]] article =) {{:User:Cipriano 119/sig}} 05:58, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
:Hey! You're the one I've been trying to get in touch with, lol. Yes, and you're right about what you've written I feel. I found on the official site where it says the stone really is a companion relic to the others, confirming that they are indeed related. Thanks for alerting me to that though, I would never have thought of that before. Do you know if there is a place where it tells more about the stone's origins? [[User:Christopher|Link87]] 06:02, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
::I wish I could help, but since the Stone of Agony is one of the least described items in the game, I really doubt there is any other information about it! =( I can look, but in writing that article, I really didn't use any sources... except for the ZW page, the official site, and {{OOT}} itself. It was all based on a hunch! See how that turned out!
::Oh, and I'm definately joining in on the Skype chat in the next couple weeks/days, so I'll be much easier to reach. {{:User:Cipriano 119/sig}} 06:16, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
:::Actually, there is a fan-fic/theory [[http://www.fanfiction.net/s/5271307/1/THE_TIMELINE_OF_ZELDA_CHRONICLESUnfinished|here]] that talks a little about the Trinity of Truth and the relics' origins in much of the same way I did, if you need extra theory embellishment for the article. As far as pure references go on the Stone's origins, I don't think there are any. =( {{:User:Cipriano 119/sig}} 12:47, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
::::Well what stumps me is that the article on the stone says that it was cut from a Gossip Stone, but I can't find any reference that states that, and I've been backward and forward through material looking for it. Have you ever heard of this? [[User:Christopher|Link87]] 15:22, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
:::::Yes, I have heard of that, and it makes sense as a further connection to Sheikah culture, but I haven't been able to source it either - I wish the Stone was in {{MM}} too so that there would be a bit more source material on it (like the other two relics). {{:User:Cipriano 119/sig}} 16:34, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
::::::Yes I know what you mean there, perhaps the game-makers implied Link to still possess it since most had already acquired a Rumble Pak by that time. Regardless, it is indeed a Sheikah relic, it's confirmed on the official site as a companion of the others. I took the liberty of adding your work, or a slightly modified version of it, to the Sheikah article too by the way, I hope you don't mind, lol. I believe Ganondorfdude11 has also taken the liberty to request the picture be transparent-ized, so that will soon be taken care of too I'm sure. It looks very nice indeed. ;) [[User:Christopher|Link87]] 16:40, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
Of course not, every thing I write on this wiki is fair game to be edited and used right? =) I agree it adds a nice finishing touch to the Sheikah article, and I feel that it was just begging to end up there anyway. The best! {{:User:Cipriano 119/sig}} 05:27, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
:I agree, it did put the finishing touch on the article, and excellent work once again! I look forward to seeing others like this. ;) [[User:Christopher|Link87]] 05:44, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
 
==Minister Potho==
Hey, I wanted to let you know that you did a great job on the Minister Potho page! Keep up the good work. {{:User:Alter/sig}} 22:31, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
 
:Well thank you Alter, I appreciate your kind words and promise to do my best to carry on the work for the articles that are in need or need creating, lol. When I was giving [[Chancellor Cole]] a work-over, I noticed there was a red link where I mentioned Minister Potho, so I thought we needed to have one created. Little did I know we had one, lol, so I transferred all the work on it to the page we had and redirected the other to it. [[User:Christopher|Link87]] 23:11, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
 
::FYI, I'm moving the whole page to "Potho". {{:User:Alter/sig}} 23:38, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
 
:::That's how I had it originally, so I'm all for it. You made an excellent point about the titles issue, and I quite agree there. [[User:Christopher|Link87]] 01:09, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
 
== ZWAIF ==
 
We have relocated from Axi's sandbox to our own project page [[Project:Zelda Wiki Article Improvement Force|here]]. Please use this from now on :3{{:User:Neo/sig}} 03:06, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
:Ok cool, understood. [[User:Christopher|Link87]] 07:04, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
 
 
== Message ==
Hey. --[[User:EDJoe45|EDJoe45]] 02:26, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
 
== Okay ==
So, I'm an admin from ZP. I can understand that you probably hate me and want to ignore me, but here me out: I do not hate you. I have never interacted with you on any level and wish to make it clear that I don't hate you. All I want to know is why you concealed that you where HoT87 from Zeldapedia? Any reason?[[User:Wowzeras|CC]]  <small>[http://zelda.wikia.com/wiki/User_talk:Ccbermanzzpedia talk]</small> 03:00, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
:Well you certainly are more polite than most, so I will give you the answer you seek. I knew that those who took over Zeldapedia would be out for my head and give our fair and balanced council here unending headaches if I revealed who I was, and those same people proved me right. Zeldapedia betrayed me, and they lost my support forever as a resulting punishment. They unjustly cast me out and illegally took my powers as a staff member without anything real to justify such action. They gave me no chance to explain why what they said was untrue, and they greatly wronged me. They did so when I was away on an internship and was away from the wiki, which also shows just how deceitful those who were involved really are. I know their game. Now, I want nothing to do with Zeldapedia b/c it's become a far more corrupt and dysfunctional organization than I found it. I am far happier here at Zelda Wiki, and I wish I had come here to begin with. I did much for Zeldapedia, despite what those who lie say about me. A good portion of your foundations were my work, and yet the thanks I got was an unjust removal b/c a select few were able to fool the others into believing I was some monster out to get them. I wanted to trust all of you, and that trust was betrayed. Considering the circumstances, I think my resulting response was justified very much. [[User:Christopher|Link87]] 03:13, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
 
::Just out of curiosity, on Halloween you mocked me and said editing wikis was for children and that you had more important matters to take care of so you moved on. However, you have been here the entire time. odd, no? --[[User:EDJoe45|EDJoe45]] 03:17, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
 
:I have nothing more to say to the above party Wowzerras, so I shall answer only your messages, so long as they remain civil. I think that is fair, would you not agree? [[User:Christopher|Link87]] 03:20, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
 
:::That purely perpetuates your hostility though. Who ever said I was here to be rude or insulting? Maybe I am just seeking an apology. Are you seriously going to ignore this insult you gave me months ago, when you were guilty the entire time? I can undelete it on ZP if I must. I've been waiting for you to apologize since I realized this was you. Now that you have come out of the closet, I think the time has finally come. I think that is fair, would you not agree? --[[User:EDJoe45|EDJoe45]] 03:26, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
 
::::I think Chris has made it clear that he's doesn't care to respond. Just let the guy edit in peace. {{:User:Alter/sig}} <span style="color: #FFFFFF;">03:54, January 11, 2010 (UTC)</span>

Latest revision as of 22:26, 22 October 2022

Christopher-gpuser is banned.
Christopher-gpuser was banned for misconduct.
Archives of User talk:Christopher-gpuser

Link Page

Chris, that comment was neither productive or necessary. Again, this is the kind of verbal harrassment that can get you banned. We all know that any reference you are making to "many months ago" is in accordance with your own work being criticized for heavy verbosity and narrative-like writing, both of which we still take a stand against today. The discussion had since been concluded before you arrived, so please refrain from provoking any further argument on this topic. Thanks! Nice to see you back around, even if it was only momentarily. — ciprianotalk 19:27, 15 September 2010 (EDT)

'Making false excuse for the incompetencies of others means nothing to me Cip. And worthless threats of banning have no effect on me, b/c in case you didn't read it, I want nothing to do with this place, and abusive unwarranted abuses of power like said threats are exactly why. So ban me and see if I really care. I've done nothing but make my opinion known, which leaves no legitimacy for any threats to stand upon. This place reeks of hypocrisy anyway, and we both know the real arguments months ago were the same ones here. Personally it's good to hear from you, but carry these words back to all the hypocrites. I told all of you so. Link87 20:21, 15 September 2010 (EDT)
I'm sorry you feel that way. I wish you luck in any future endeavor you may have. — ciprianotalk 20:33, 15 September 2010 (EDT)
I'm sorry to seem rigid or harsh, but after the biased and unfair attacks on me and illegitimate bans, i'm fed up with some of the so-called "staff" after they did nothing to rein in the spoiled brat who thought he was God and attacked me while embracing his position of no responsibility and treating his power like a "do-whatever-I-want-and-get-away-with-it badge". It's blatantly obvious they did so simply with bias toward me now. Here they are seven months later embracing every argument I made against him back then. Blatant hypocrisy. Had the "staff" done their duty and rejected bias, this fiasco of late would have been resolved a LONG time ago. I personally have nothing against you and respect you, but I have no respect or sympathy for the hypocrites, and they know who they are. Until Zeldawiki cleans house, I want nothing more to do with it. Link87 21:09, 15 September 2010 (EDT)

Last note on the ban

I just want to let you know that this ban was backed with full staff support. I understand that this movement may not faze you in the least. Your behavioral conduct on this wiki is, and has been unacceptable. We cannot let the users, let alone the future users of this wiki stand to be intimidated by you any longer. Perhaps we, the staff, made mistakes in the past, and continue to make them, but that is no reason to cyber-bully anyone. It is unfortunate that it has come to this, but the admin staff feels that this action was in the best interest of the wiki. Again, I wish you luck in all of your future endeavors. — ciprianotalk 19:52, 16 September 2010 (EDT)