Zelda Wiki:Failed Nominations/Picture: Difference between revisions
m (Text replacement - "{{oppose}}" to "{{Oppose}}") |
|||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| content= [[File:lightsword.jpg|frame]] | | content= [[File:lightsword.jpg|frame]] | ||
An amazing picture that to me, shows the true potential of the Master Sword. --[[User:Seablue254|Seablue254]] 17:25, 2 April 2008 (EDT) | An amazing picture that to me, shows the true potential of the Master Sword. --[[User:Seablue254|Seablue254]] 17:25, 2 April 2008 (EDT) | ||
{{ | {{Oppose}} | ||
#Its a bit to fuzzy--[[User:Zanramon|Zanramon ( ' .' ) look its kirby ['_>']]] 17:42, 2 April 2008 (EDT) | #Its a bit to fuzzy--[[User:Zanramon|Zanramon ( ' .' ) look its kirby ['_>']]] 17:42, 2 April 2008 (EDT) | ||
#Zanramons right, it's too fuzy. --[[User:Link hero of light|Link hero of light]] 21:06, 2 April 2008 (EDT) | #Zanramons right, it's too fuzy. --[[User:Link hero of light|Link hero of light]] 21:06, 2 April 2008 (EDT) | ||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
# I think it'd be fun to have a picture of the toy Zant up.<font color=red>''' (Unsigned vote by [[User:Blood Rayne|Blood Rayne]] - see rule 6 above)'''</font> | # I think it'd be fun to have a picture of the toy Zant up.<font color=red>''' (Unsigned vote by [[User:Blood Rayne|Blood Rayne]] - see rule 6 above)'''</font> | ||
{{ | {{Oppose}} | ||
#Not one for me, I'm afraid. Neither the image or the figure itself are particularly good. —[[User:Adam|Adam]] <sup>([[User talk:Adam1400|talk]])</sup> 15:19, 26 March 2008 (EDT) | #Not one for me, I'm afraid. Neither the image or the figure itself are particularly good. —[[User:Adam|Adam]] <sup>([[User talk:Adam1400|talk]])</sup> 15:19, 26 March 2008 (EDT) | ||
#No this picture aint that great —[[User:lom678|lom678]] | #No this picture aint that great —[[User:lom678|lom678]] | ||
Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
#Toon link is cool and Wind waker is one of my favourite zelda games.--[[User:Olle93|Olle93]] 20:51, 15 April | #Toon link is cool and Wind waker is one of my favourite zelda games.--[[User:Olle93|Olle93]] 20:51, 15 April | ||
#He's my best Brawl character and my favorite Link incarnation--[[User:IceySheegoth|IceySheegoth]]11:24,28 April 2008 (PT) | #He's my best Brawl character and my favorite Link incarnation--[[User:IceySheegoth|IceySheegoth]]11:24,28 April 2008 (PT) | ||
{{ | {{Oppose}} | ||
#I really like this picture and think that it should eventually be a featured picture. But Brawl has been out for less than a month and I don't think we should have spoilers of this level on the main page. --[[User:Hisak|Hisak]] 21:24, 3 April 2008 (EDT) | #I really like this picture and think that it should eventually be a featured picture. But Brawl has been out for less than a month and I don't think we should have spoilers of this level on the main page. --[[User:Hisak|Hisak]] 21:24, 3 April 2008 (EDT) | ||
#I agree with Hisak. At this point of time, this is still spoiler worthy for those few Zelda fans who don't know about it.[[User:Mases|Mases]] 16:51, 28 April 2008 (UTC) | #I agree with Hisak. At this point of time, this is still spoiler worthy for those few Zelda fans who don't know about it.[[User:Mases|Mases]] 16:51, 28 April 2008 (UTC) | ||
Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
#i love Zant! He is probably one of the coolest bosses. And Twilight Princess was my first Zelda game. I love his story he tells you. --TwilightKing2 | #i love Zant! He is probably one of the coolest bosses. And Twilight Princess was my first Zelda game. I love his story he tells you. --TwilightKing2 | ||
#As he recently became my favourite boss, I'll give my month's vote to Zant. It is an awesome picture. From the Wii, I notice. --[[User:Yuvorias|Yuvorias]] | #As he recently became my favourite boss, I'll give my month's vote to Zant. It is an awesome picture. From the Wii, I notice. --[[User:Yuvorias|Yuvorias]] | ||
{{ | {{Oppose}} | ||
#The pictures a little too fuzzy --[[User:Seablue254|David]] <sup>([[User talk:Seablue254|T]] : [[Special:Contributions/Seablue254|C]])</sup> 21:12, 14 April 2008 (UTC) | #The pictures a little too fuzzy --[[User:Seablue254|David]] <sup>([[User talk:Seablue254|T]] : [[Special:Contributions/Seablue254|C]])</sup> 21:12, 14 April 2008 (UTC) | ||
#It's not a bad picture, but the quality could be a little better if it's to be featured... --[[User:Douken|Douken]] 22:04, 7 May 2008 (UTC) | #It's not a bad picture, but the quality could be a little better if it's to be featured... --[[User:Douken|Douken]] 22:04, 7 May 2008 (UTC) | ||
Line 69: | Line 69: | ||
#This is a cool picture, and Deku Babas are so cool.--[[User:Article and Picture Voter|Article and Picture Voter]] 19:44, 1 April 2008 (EDT) | #This is a cool picture, and Deku Babas are so cool.--[[User:Article and Picture Voter|Article and Picture Voter]] 19:44, 1 April 2008 (EDT) | ||
{{ | {{Oppose}} | ||
#Maybe if it was the original picture, but as this is a wallpaper made from the art, no [[User:TheManInTheMoon|TheManInTheMoon]] 07:32, 28 April 2008 (UTC) | #Maybe if it was the original picture, but as this is a wallpaper made from the art, no [[User:TheManInTheMoon|TheManInTheMoon]] 07:32, 28 April 2008 (UTC) | ||
#I'm with ManInTheMoon on this. --[[User:Douken|Douken]] 22:04, 7 May 2008 (UTC) | #I'm with ManInTheMoon on this. --[[User:Douken|Douken]] 22:04, 7 May 2008 (UTC) | ||
Line 83: | Line 83: | ||
{{support}} | {{support}} | ||
{{ | {{Oppose}} | ||
#Yeah, I have to oppose this one. The article [[Master Sword]] is also nominated, and it looks like it'll pretty soon end up being featured. That being the case, this image will already be on the main page anyway! (Oh yeah, and also [[:File:Ootmastersword.jpeg|this image]] has already been featured pretty recently too! Need I go on?) --[[User:Adam|Adam]] 21:10, 9 May 2008 (UTC) | #Yeah, I have to oppose this one. The article [[Master Sword]] is also nominated, and it looks like it'll pretty soon end up being featured. That being the case, this image will already be on the main page anyway! (Oh yeah, and also [[:File:Ootmastersword.jpeg|this image]] has already been featured pretty recently too! Need I go on?) --[[User:Adam|Adam]] 21:10, 9 May 2008 (UTC) | ||
#I have to agree with Adam on this. And apart from that, the is not all that great.--[[User:Link hero of light|Link hero of light]] 22:54, 9 May 2008 (UTC) | #I have to agree with Adam on this. And apart from that, the is not all that great.--[[User:Link hero of light|Link hero of light]] 22:54, 9 May 2008 (UTC) | ||
Line 96: | Line 96: | ||
{{support}} | {{support}} | ||
{{ | {{Oppose}} | ||
#I like the subject matter, and there really ''should'' be a featured pic of the final epic duel between Link and Ganondorf, but when I take a look at the full-sized image, it's just too blurry. When I played the game, I was fairly sure that I could make out more of Ganondorf's facial features than a couple of dots and a curved line for his eyes and mouth. For the time being, it's a no. If you could find a cleaned up version of it, I would certainly vote for it. | #I like the subject matter, and there really ''should'' be a featured pic of the final epic duel between Link and Ganondorf, but when I take a look at the full-sized image, it's just too blurry. When I played the game, I was fairly sure that I could make out more of Ganondorf's facial features than a couple of dots and a curved line for his eyes and mouth. For the time being, it's a no. If you could find a cleaned up version of it, I would certainly vote for it. | ||
#I agree, it's definately more clear on the game. As soon as it's cleared up, it'll have my vote. --[[User:Yuvorias|Mr. Mystery]], 11:17, 11 May 2008 (EST) | #I agree, it's definately more clear on the game. As soon as it's cleared up, it'll have my vote. --[[User:Yuvorias|Mr. Mystery]], 11:17, 11 May 2008 (EST) | ||
Line 109: | Line 109: | ||
{{support}} | {{support}} | ||
{{ | {{Oppose}} | ||
#More duplicates? We've already very recently featured a picture of [[:File:Link Darknuts.jpg|Link fighting Darknuts]]. While this is a nice image, it would have to wait until the other had been disqualified before a nomination would get anywhere. We have thousands of images here at ZW, surely we don't need to have repeats within a selection of the 16 best ones? --[[User:Adam|Adam]] 07:21, 17 May 2008 (UTC) | #More duplicates? We've already very recently featured a picture of [[:File:Link Darknuts.jpg|Link fighting Darknuts]]. While this is a nice image, it would have to wait until the other had been disqualified before a nomination would get anywhere. We have thousands of images here at ZW, surely we don't need to have repeats within a selection of the 16 best ones? --[[User:Adam|Adam]] 07:21, 17 May 2008 (UTC) | ||
#This should not have even been nominated. It does not have any templates. Also, there was already four images up for voting - at the time of its nomination. We don't need featured images similar to ones we already have.--[[User:Matt1828|Matt]] 08:52, 17 May 2008 (UTC) | #This should not have even been nominated. It does not have any templates. Also, there was already four images up for voting - at the time of its nomination. We don't need featured images similar to ones we already have.--[[User:Matt1828|Matt]] 08:52, 17 May 2008 (UTC) | ||
Line 141: | Line 141: | ||
#This picture is so detailed, and the beast is at an angle that perfectly reveals all of its best features. ^_^ --[[User:Fairy Boy|Fairy Boy]], 10:06, 20 June 2008 (CST) | #This picture is so detailed, and the beast is at an angle that perfectly reveals all of its best features. ^_^ --[[User:Fairy Boy|Fairy Boy]], 10:06, 20 June 2008 (CST) | ||
{{ | {{Oppose}} | ||
# try again. --[[User:The Legend of Zelda|The Legend of Zelda]] 02:50, 6 May 2008 (UTC) | # try again. --[[User:The Legend of Zelda|The Legend of Zelda]] 02:50, 6 May 2008 (UTC) | ||
# the thing is creepy and unusally is hard to beat it after you beat the a lot of times --[[User:Lightningtom|Lightningtom]] 19:47, June 8, 2008 (UTC) | # the thing is creepy and unusally is hard to beat it after you beat the a lot of times --[[User:Lightningtom|Lightningtom]] 19:47, June 8, 2008 (UTC) | ||
Line 157: | Line 157: | ||
# <s>If it wasn't for the texturing on the cliff's I'd swear this was from a newer game, especially since I've missed it every time I've gone through OoT. This has my vote.</s>{{unsign|AmrasCalmacil}} | # <s>If it wasn't for the texturing on the cliff's I'd swear this was from a newer game, especially since I've missed it every time I've gone through OoT. This has my vote.</s>{{unsign|AmrasCalmacil}} | ||
{{ | {{Oppose}} | ||
#Even though the image is large, I not comfortable with featuring a screenshot from a game with such primitive graphics. I'm not seeing any of this beauty you speak of. I'm sure that others won't either. I am also uncomfortable with us featuring an image portraying a statue of a goddess that isn't even confirmed to exist in the "''The Legend of Zelda'' universe." So I'm saying no. {{:User:Matt/sig|~}} <span style="color:#C0C0C0;">20:33, June 24, 2008 (UTC)</span> | #Even though the image is large, I not comfortable with featuring a screenshot from a game with such primitive graphics. I'm not seeing any of this beauty you speak of. I'm sure that others won't either. I am also uncomfortable with us featuring an image portraying a statue of a goddess that isn't even confirmed to exist in the "''The Legend of Zelda'' universe." So I'm saying no. {{:User:Matt/sig|~}} <span style="color:#C0C0C0;">20:33, June 24, 2008 (UTC)</span> | ||
#I'd been meaning to voice my opinion on this for a while. Don't get me wrong, I really like the image (I did upload it after all!). However, it's not actually an official image. As you'll see from the source link I added to the image page, it's from a fan-made high-res texture mod. In the light of the recent conflagratory mega-debate over fan-made content, I'm not about to base my objection solely on this fact. My problem is that the image is misleading; the actual in-game visual is more like [http://www.zeldawiki.org/images/archive/5/58/20080129194504%21Desertcolossus.jpg this]. {{:User:Adam/sig}} 15:52, 28 June 2008 (UTC) | #I'd been meaning to voice my opinion on this for a while. Don't get me wrong, I really like the image (I did upload it after all!). However, it's not actually an official image. As you'll see from the source link I added to the image page, it's from a fan-made high-res texture mod. In the light of the recent conflagratory mega-debate over fan-made content, I'm not about to base my objection solely on this fact. My problem is that the image is misleading; the actual in-game visual is more like [http://www.zeldawiki.org/images/archive/5/58/20080129194504%21Desertcolossus.jpg this]. {{:User:Adam/sig}} 15:52, 28 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
Line 173: | Line 173: | ||
#Good! This is an excellent picture that shows Link's aspect in almost all of its games. It looks interesting and deserves the place. [[User:Molgeratwinmold55|Molgeratwinmold55]] 13:10, 2 July 2008 (UTC) | #Good! This is an excellent picture that shows Link's aspect in almost all of its games. It looks interesting and deserves the place. [[User:Molgeratwinmold55|Molgeratwinmold55]] 13:10, 2 July 2008 (UTC) | ||
{{ | {{Oppose}} | ||
#It’s a good picture, but I personally don’t think fan art should be used for the main page image. --[[User:Paulreilly86|Paulreilly86]] 14:11, 6 July 2008 (UTC) | #It’s a good picture, but I personally don’t think fan art should be used for the main page image. --[[User:Paulreilly86|Paulreilly86]] 14:11, 6 July 2008 (UTC) | ||
#Sorry, Sea, but I've gotta oppose this. It's kind of neat to see the "progression" of Link, so to speak, but the picture itself isn't very cool-looking. Just a few pictures of Link pasted together. Kind of boring if you ask me. {{:User:Ando1400/sig}} 15:58, 6 July 2008 (UTC) | #Sorry, Sea, but I've gotta oppose this. It's kind of neat to see the "progression" of Link, so to speak, but the picture itself isn't very cool-looking. Just a few pictures of Link pasted together. Kind of boring if you ask me. {{:User:Ando1400/sig}} 15:58, 6 July 2008 (UTC) | ||
Line 193: | Line 193: | ||
#This would look nice on the main page, yes I could see this as a featured picture, and the art looks really nice, Zelda renders and hi-res photos always have the sparkle that catches my attention everytime. {{User:GA/sig}} | #This would look nice on the main page, yes I could see this as a featured picture, and the art looks really nice, Zelda renders and hi-res photos always have the sparkle that catches my attention everytime. {{User:GA/sig}} | ||
{{ | {{Oppose}} | ||
#--[[User:Article and Picture Voter|Article and Picture Voter]] 18:32, 11 May 2008 (UTC) <!--Some text would be nice next time please! (Adam, 27 May 2008)--> | #--[[User:Article and Picture Voter|Article and Picture Voter]] 18:32, 11 May 2008 (UTC) <!--Some text would be nice next time please! (Adam, 27 May 2008)--> | ||
#While this is a good picture, along with the one of Fyrus, and many similar Twilight Princess images; this is one of a set that is only set apart by the character in them, also there are two similar pictures already featured of Midna and Faron--[[User:gillispie|Gillispie]] 7:41, 1 August 2008 | #While this is a good picture, along with the one of Fyrus, and many similar Twilight Princess images; this is one of a set that is only set apart by the character in them, also there are two similar pictures already featured of Midna and Faron--[[User:gillispie|Gillispie]] 7:41, 1 August 2008 | ||
Line 206: | Line 206: | ||
This picture was taken from The Minish Cap. The picture shows Link battling against a Darknut in Dark Hyrule Castle. I chose this picture because I like to fight against Darknuts because they look cool! --[[User: Draonjioel|Draonjioel]] 20:35, 6 August 2008 (UTC) | This picture was taken from The Minish Cap. The picture shows Link battling against a Darknut in Dark Hyrule Castle. I chose this picture because I like to fight against Darknuts because they look cool! --[[User: Draonjioel|Draonjioel]] 20:35, 6 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
{{support}} | {{support}} | ||
{{ | {{Oppose}} | ||
'''Invalid nomination. Already failed just a few months ago (see [[#Darknut Duel|above]])''' {{:User:Adam/sig}} 17:11, 7 August 2008 (UTC) | '''Invalid nomination. Already failed just a few months ago (see [[#Darknut Duel|above]])''' {{:User:Adam/sig}} 17:11, 7 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
Line 220: | Line 220: | ||
{{support}} | {{support}} | ||
#I think it is a beautiful picture, The Master Sword is something that draws my interest, it should be featured.-The Sage of Cosmos | #I think it is a beautiful picture, The Master Sword is something that draws my interest, it should be featured.-The Sage of Cosmos | ||
{{ | {{Oppose}} | ||
#I'm afraid that I have to oppose this one. We have already Featured both the [[Master Sword]] article, and an [[:File:Ootmastersword.jpeg|image featuring the sword prominently]]. Adding this one would, in my view, put too much emphasis one one subject. I don't think we can really justify featuring an article and picture of the same subject under any circumstance. I would suggest that this image be used to replace the current one shown Template:FA/33|here; that way it can appear on the Main Page without having to be individually featured. {{:User:Adam/sig}} 05:24, 19 August 2008 (UTC) | #I'm afraid that I have to oppose this one. We have already Featured both the [[Master Sword]] article, and an [[:File:Ootmastersword.jpeg|image featuring the sword prominently]]. Adding this one would, in my view, put too much emphasis one one subject. I don't think we can really justify featuring an article and picture of the same subject under any circumstance. I would suggest that this image be used to replace the current one shown Template:FA/33|here; that way it can appear on the Main Page without having to be individually featured. {{:User:Adam/sig}} 05:24, 19 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
#My sentiments echo Adam's. I should know, I was the one who nominated the Article, as well as another image of the Master Sword that was soundly rejected. And this is far more boring than the one I nominated, in my view. At least the Empty Bottle was original. Also, there's a Link Vs Darknut image which is periodically disqualified from these nominations almost for the same reason as here. If we put this up, wouldn't that be kind of [[Wikipedia:Two_Face|two-faced]]? --[[User:Yuvorias|Felicia's Champion]] 02:31, 21 August 2008 (UTC) | #My sentiments echo Adam's. I should know, I was the one who nominated the Article, as well as another image of the Master Sword that was soundly rejected. And this is far more boring than the one I nominated, in my view. At least the Empty Bottle was original. Also, there's a Link Vs Darknut image which is periodically disqualified from these nominations almost for the same reason as here. If we put this up, wouldn't that be kind of [[Wikipedia:Two_Face|two-faced]]? --[[User:Yuvorias|Felicia's Champion]] 02:31, 21 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
Line 233: | Line 233: | ||
#I have to agree. Wind Waker does have great artwork. I love it. And bottles are a neccesity. I do like Twilight Princess and have never played Phantom Hourglass. But this bottle looks cool.[[User:CoreyPotter|CoreyPotter]] 00:59, 11 August 2008 (UTC)CoreyPotter | #I have to agree. Wind Waker does have great artwork. I love it. And bottles are a neccesity. I do like Twilight Princess and have never played Phantom Hourglass. But this bottle looks cool.[[User:CoreyPotter|CoreyPotter]] 00:59, 11 August 2008 (UTC)CoreyPotter | ||
#Well.. yeah... it is a simple but beautiful image and i like it.[[User:Olle93|Olle93]] 22:54, 11 August 2008 | #Well.. yeah... it is a simple but beautiful image and i like it.[[User:Olle93|Olle93]] 22:54, 11 August 2008 | ||
{{ | {{Oppose}} | ||
#While it is a high quality picture, I find that it is too boring to be featured. Other people would laugh when they saw that we featured an empty bottle.--[[User:Article and Picture Voter|Article and Picture Voter]] 20:04, 13 August 2008 (UTC) | #While it is a high quality picture, I find that it is too boring to be featured. Other people would laugh when they saw that we featured an empty bottle.--[[User:Article and Picture Voter|Article and Picture Voter]] 20:04, 13 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
#For the above reasons exactly. It's high quality, large, and representative of WW's style, but it's so simple that it's boring. When I think of a featured picture, I think of something that's interesting and captures the essence of a moment, like a big, scary boss that's screaming its head off. So, for me, it's a no.--[[User:Rdnckj258|Rdnckj258]] 18:00, 15 August 2008 (UTC) | #For the above reasons exactly. It's high quality, large, and representative of WW's style, but it's so simple that it's boring. When I think of a featured picture, I think of something that's interesting and captures the essence of a moment, like a big, scary boss that's screaming its head off. So, for me, it's a no.--[[User:Rdnckj258|Rdnckj258]] 18:00, 15 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
Line 245: | Line 245: | ||
This picture failed before, but only because it is a spoiler. I think that Super Smash Bros. Brawl has been out long enough and most people have unlocked Toon Link by now.--[[User:Link hero of light|Link hero of light]] 21:52, 23 August 2008 (UTC) | This picture failed before, but only because it is a spoiler. I think that Super Smash Bros. Brawl has been out long enough and most people have unlocked Toon Link by now.--[[User:Link hero of light|Link hero of light]] 21:52, 23 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
{{ | {{Oppose}} | ||
#Sorry, I have to oppose this again. Like I said last time, I find this picture very plain... --[[User:Yuvorias|Felicia's Champion]] 09:07, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | #Sorry, I have to oppose this again. Like I said last time, I find this picture very plain... --[[User:Yuvorias|Felicia's Champion]] 09:07, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
#There's already a picture of him in the featured image "Link's Piggy Pals". I don't exactly think we need another one. {{:User:Seablue254/sig}} 00:50, 27 August 2008 (UTC) | #There's already a picture of him in the featured image "Link's Piggy Pals". I don't exactly think we need another one. {{:User:Seablue254/sig}} 00:50, 27 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
Line 262: | Line 262: | ||
#I think it's awesome. It shows how the Zelda series has steadily gotten more mature. Yay! --[[User:Hylian Wannabe|Hylian Wannabe]] 11:44, 30 August 2008 (UTC) | #I think it's awesome. It shows how the Zelda series has steadily gotten more mature. Yay! --[[User:Hylian Wannabe|Hylian Wannabe]] 11:44, 30 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
#I think it explains the plot of Twilight Princess[[User:Talorules|Talorules]] 01:08, 11 September 2008 (UTC) | #I think it explains the plot of Twilight Princess[[User:Talorules|Talorules]] 01:08, 11 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
{{ | {{Oppose}} | ||
#It just doesn't show Twilight Princess' awsomeness. Also it is kind of boring.[[User:CoreyPotter|CoreyPotter]] 20:02, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | #It just doesn't show Twilight Princess' awsomeness. Also it is kind of boring.[[User:CoreyPotter|CoreyPotter]] 20:02, 24 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
#The picture doesn't really say anything about Twilight Princess. It's just too plain. [[User:Angmar|Angmar]] 07:03, 5 September 2008 (UTC)Angmar | #The picture doesn't really say anything about Twilight Princess. It's just too plain. [[User:Angmar|Angmar]] 07:03, 5 September 2008 (UTC)Angmar | ||
Line 275: | Line 275: | ||
{{support}} | {{support}} | ||
{{ | {{Oppose}} | ||
# As much as it is rare and interesting, it's also small and fairly low resolution.--[[User:Rdnckj258|Rdnckj258]] 18:45, 21 September 2008 (UTC) | # As much as it is rare and interesting, it's also small and fairly low resolution.--[[User:Rdnckj258|Rdnckj258]] 18:45, 21 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
#It's a little blurry too. There are several shots of "Beta TP" like this, so it would seem odd to just feature one anyway. --[[User:Douken|Douken]] 20:33, 21 September 2008 (UTC) | #It's a little blurry too. There are several shots of "Beta TP" like this, so it would seem odd to just feature one anyway. --[[User:Douken|Douken]] 20:33, 21 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
Line 318: | Line 318: | ||
{{ | {{Oppose}} | ||
#I don't really see what is so impressive about this image. It is rather bland and not particularly interesting. It doesn't really stand out among the vast number of images on this site. It is no more interesting than most others. Too simple to be featured.{{:User:Matt/sig|~}} <span style="color:#C0C0C0;">03:17, September 27, 2008 (UTC)</span> | #I don't really see what is so impressive about this image. It is rather bland and not particularly interesting. It doesn't really stand out among the vast number of images on this site. It is no more interesting than most others. Too simple to be featured.{{:User:Matt/sig|~}} <span style="color:#C0C0C0;">03:17, September 27, 2008 (UTC)</span> | ||
#This picture does show anything particuarly interesting. It does not show you you something important. The image leaves something to be desired, and is also simple to the point where the larger portion of the pictures on this web address are more interesting. the flaws are too great for it to be featured.[[User:Kingbulbin|Kingbulbin]] 11:41, 30 September 2008 (UTC) | #This picture does show anything particuarly interesting. It does not show you you something important. The image leaves something to be desired, and is also simple to the point where the larger portion of the pictures on this web address are more interesting. the flaws are too great for it to be featured.[[User:Kingbulbin|Kingbulbin]] 11:41, 30 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
Line 422: | Line 422: | ||
# '''A'''. It not only is cool, but who wants a huge logo to break the scene?[[User:Dekuta|Dekuta]] 15:26, 26 October 2008 (UTC) | # '''A'''. It not only is cool, but who wants a huge logo to break the scene?[[User:Dekuta|Dekuta]] 15:26, 26 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
{{ | {{Oppose}} | ||
# I don't like either one. '''A''' is too zoomed in, and '''B''' has a logo. There needs to be a different Phantom Hourglass picture featured.--[[User:HeroOfTime6|HeroOfTime6]] 19:47, 17 November 2008 (UTC) | # I don't like either one. '''A''' is too zoomed in, and '''B''' has a logo. There needs to be a different Phantom Hourglass picture featured.--[[User:HeroOfTime6|HeroOfTime6]] 19:47, 17 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
# Actually... yeah, I agree with HeroOfTime on this. --[[User:Douken|Douken]] 22:05, 17 November 2008 (UTC) | # Actually... yeah, I agree with HeroOfTime on this. --[[User:Douken|Douken]] 22:05, 17 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
Line 491: | Line 491: | ||
{{support}} | {{support}} | ||
#I really like this picture. There's something about Majora's Mask artwork for the characters and monsters that I really liked, and still do to this day. [[User:Ancblue52|Ancblue52]] 05:01, 15 December 2008 (UTC) | #I really like this picture. There's something about Majora's Mask artwork for the characters and monsters that I really liked, and still do to this day. [[User:Ancblue52|Ancblue52]] 05:01, 15 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
{{ | {{Oppose}} | ||
#This picture has too much shadow and is too hard to see. It also doesn't have very good perspective making the giant Twinmold look small.--[[User:Link hero of light|Link hero of light]] 01:51, 4 December 2008 (UTC) | #This picture has too much shadow and is too hard to see. It also doesn't have very good perspective making the giant Twinmold look small.--[[User:Link hero of light|Link hero of light]] 01:51, 4 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
#In almost 5 months, this image has gained '''one''' vote in support. It's clear that this is never going to reach featured status, and with that kind of overwhelming clamor of support it's clear that it doesn't deserve to. To me, the image is mediocre; I have no strong feelings either way about the style or content. Maybe that's why it's been here so long, and why it has to go. {{:User:Adam/sig}} 21:30, 12 April 2009 (UTC) | #In almost 5 months, this image has gained '''one''' vote in support. It's clear that this is never going to reach featured status, and with that kind of overwhelming clamor of support it's clear that it doesn't deserve to. To me, the image is mediocre; I have no strong feelings either way about the style or content. Maybe that's why it's been here so long, and why it has to go. {{:User:Adam/sig}} 21:30, 12 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
Line 525: | Line 525: | ||
#This is a really good picture from what is perhaps one of the best portable games ever. It shows all the dynamic emotion and styles that were used in the game, as well as how the boss is fought, in a sort of vauge way.--[[User:Petman1325|Petman1325]] 20:14, 15 April 2009 (UTC) | #This is a really good picture from what is perhaps one of the best portable games ever. It shows all the dynamic emotion and styles that were used in the game, as well as how the boss is fought, in a sort of vauge way.--[[User:Petman1325|Petman1325]] 20:14, 15 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
#The Phantom Hourglass cut out style is so unique![[User:CoreyPotter|Corey Lord of Tacos!]] 02:02, 18 April 2009 (UTC) | #The Phantom Hourglass cut out style is so unique![[User:CoreyPotter|Corey Lord of Tacos!]] 02:02, 18 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
{{ | {{Oppose}} | ||
#This image is incredibly small. It is much smaller than most of our currently featured images. Plus it is one image out of many that are very similar to it. Doesn't really strike me as awesome. Not compared to what we have.{{:User:Matt/sig|~}} 21:47, April 15, 2009 (UTC) | #This image is incredibly small. It is much smaller than most of our currently featured images. Plus it is one image out of many that are very similar to it. Doesn't really strike me as awesome. Not compared to what we have.{{:User:Matt/sig|~}} 21:47, April 15, 2009 (UTC) | ||
#I agree with Matt. Although Bellumbeck is awesome, this cutout doesn't stand out from the others in my opinion and doesn't really seem like much compared to other nominees. Kind of droll really. Then there's the size. {{:User:Melchizedek1866/sig 04:12, 16 April 2009 (UTC) | #I agree with Matt. Although Bellumbeck is awesome, this cutout doesn't stand out from the others in my opinion and doesn't really seem like much compared to other nominees. Kind of droll really. Then there's the size. {{:User:Melchizedek1866/sig 04:12, 16 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
Line 542: | Line 542: | ||
{{support}} | {{support}} | ||
{{ | {{Oppose}} | ||
#Eh...my first and real gripe with this image is the quality. It seems choppy and the transparency job is rather poor. It's also rather uninteresting.{{:User:Mandi/sig}} 04:39, 30 September 2009 (UTC) | #Eh...my first and real gripe with this image is the quality. It seems choppy and the transparency job is rather poor. It's also rather uninteresting.{{:User:Mandi/sig}} 04:39, 30 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
#The transparency job is done badly, but the image also offers nothing special. It is rather stock-standard, not encapsulating any mood or interest. It doesn't draw people in. {{:User:Melchizedek1866/sig 04:11, 1 October 2009 (UTC) | #The transparency job is done badly, but the image also offers nothing special. It is rather stock-standard, not encapsulating any mood or interest. It doesn't draw people in. {{:User:Melchizedek1866/sig 04:11, 1 October 2009 (UTC) | ||
Line 606: | Line 606: | ||
#Definitely. I still need to get those comics, anyway it'll be good to raise awareness the comics and the older games. [[User:PureLocke|PureLocke]] 22:08, 28 May 2010 (UTC) | #Definitely. I still need to get those comics, anyway it'll be good to raise awareness the comics and the older games. [[User:PureLocke|PureLocke]] 22:08, 28 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
#Wow, totally unique, and the quality is surprisingly good. I say we have more obscure pics like this in the future! {{User:Pyrobomber/sig}} 02:23, 18 June 2010 (UTC) | #Wow, totally unique, and the quality is surprisingly good. I say we have more obscure pics like this in the future! {{User:Pyrobomber/sig}} 02:23, 18 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
{{ | {{Oppose}} | ||
#To me, this seems like a rather small part of Zelda and Valiant Comics. It is deatiled, but there's nothing special about it. --F4{[Domino29]} 21:17, 12 August 2010 (EDT) | #To me, this seems like a rather small part of Zelda and Valiant Comics. It is deatiled, but there's nothing special about it. --F4{[Domino29]} 21:17, 12 August 2010 (EDT) | ||
#Am I allowed to re-add and re-phrase my vote if it got negated, especially if I feel the negater misunderstood me? Because I wasn't saying that the subject of the picture was bad, I was saying that the picture itself doesn't deserve to be featured. It just looks like a normal picture; nothing special about it. {{User:Minda of Darkness/sig}} | #Am I allowed to re-add and re-phrase my vote if it got negated, especially if I feel the negater misunderstood me? Because I wasn't saying that the subject of the picture was bad, I was saying that the picture itself doesn't deserve to be featured. It just looks like a normal picture; nothing special about it. {{User:Minda of Darkness/sig}} | ||
Line 622: | Line 622: | ||
#This image...it's so opaque, but the thing about it that caught my eye is the shadows. They contrast with the rest of the image so well I want to get my controller and make a new file just so I can compare the image to the tree in the game.{{:User:HelmarokKing/sig}} 09:33, 2 November 2010 (EDT) | #This image...it's so opaque, but the thing about it that caught my eye is the shadows. They contrast with the rest of the image so well I want to get my controller and make a new file just so I can compare the image to the tree in the game.{{:User:HelmarokKing/sig}} 09:33, 2 November 2010 (EDT) | ||
{{ | {{Oppose}} | ||
#This image isn't that high of quality. It looks rather pixeled and low quality, something you'd see from a crappy scanner.{{:User:Mandi/sig}} 21:03, November 17, 2010 (UTC) | #This image isn't that high of quality. It looks rather pixeled and low quality, something you'd see from a crappy scanner.{{:User:Mandi/sig}} 21:03, November 17, 2010 (UTC) | ||
#I'm going to have to say no here, too. It's way too small and pixelated. It looks like it was scanned out of the Nintendo Power guide, as it's about that size and it's has artifact lines running back and forth on it that look like it's from light leaking into the scanner, like you get when scanning something from a book or magazine. Unless a better version can be found, I don't think this should be featured.{{:User:Matt/sig|~}} 02:07, February 16, 2011 (UTC) | #I'm going to have to say no here, too. It's way too small and pixelated. It looks like it was scanned out of the Nintendo Power guide, as it's about that size and it's has artifact lines running back and forth on it that look like it's from light leaking into the scanner, like you get when scanning something from a book or magazine. Unless a better version can be found, I don't think this should be featured.{{:User:Matt/sig|~}} 02:07, February 16, 2011 (UTC) | ||
Line 637: | Line 637: | ||
#I agree. Even zooming in all the way, the picture is not pixely. It is very HQ and shows the "characters" of the game. :3 [[User:LegendOfHyrule31|LegendOfHyrule31]] 21:00, 5 May 2011 (EDT) | #I agree. Even zooming in all the way, the picture is not pixely. It is very HQ and shows the "characters" of the game. :3 [[User:LegendOfHyrule31|LegendOfHyrule31]] 21:00, 5 May 2011 (EDT) | ||
{{ | {{Oppose}} | ||
#While there's nothing particularly ''wrong'' with this image, I'm not wowed by it at all. There's no weight to it - it's three rather plain, if accurate, renders in one picture. It needs something more notable to qualify for featured status... something that makes me say to myself, "How have I never seen this amazing picture before?!" {{:User:Embyr 75/sig}} 00:53, 6 May 2011 (EDT) | #While there's nothing particularly ''wrong'' with this image, I'm not wowed by it at all. There's no weight to it - it's three rather plain, if accurate, renders in one picture. It needs something more notable to qualify for featured status... something that makes me say to myself, "How have I never seen this amazing picture before?!" {{:User:Embyr 75/sig}} 00:53, 6 May 2011 (EDT) | ||
#I absolutely agree. There's really nothing that special to me about this picture. If this deserves to be featured, then so does pretty much every other high quality ''Spirit Tracks'' artwork we have. There are plenty of amazing, high quality renders around the Wiki. That doesn't mean they all deserve to be featured. {{:User:Hylian King/sig}} 08:15, 6 May 2011 (EDT) | #I absolutely agree. There's really nothing that special to me about this picture. If this deserves to be featured, then so does pretty much every other high quality ''Spirit Tracks'' artwork we have. There are plenty of amazing, high quality renders around the Wiki. That doesn't mean they all deserve to be featured. {{:User:Hylian King/sig}} 08:15, 6 May 2011 (EDT) | ||
Line 652: | Line 652: | ||
{{support}} | {{support}} | ||
{{ | {{Oppose}} | ||
#The quality here is horrible, and really, who wants to have the '''back''' of something as featured?<span style="color:#3FA9D0;">—★</span>[[User:Chip200|<span style="color:yellow;">Chip</span>]][[User Talk:Chip200|<span style="color:orange;"><sup>200</sup></span>]] 14:57, 11 May 2011 (EDT) | #The quality here is horrible, and really, who wants to have the '''back''' of something as featured?<span style="color:#3FA9D0;">—★</span>[[User:Chip200|<span style="color:yellow;">Chip</span>]][[User Talk:Chip200|<span style="color:orange;"><sup>200</sup></span>]] 14:57, 11 May 2011 (EDT) | ||
#This image looks spectacular in its thumbnail version, however upon viewing full size... not so much. Not only does the resolution seem to be low, but the transparency is choppy and not to mention the black lines are rather obnoxious looking. It's a beautiful image, just not feature quality. {{:User:Mandi/sig}} 23:04, June 30, 2011 (UTC) | #This image looks spectacular in its thumbnail version, however upon viewing full size... not so much. Not only does the resolution seem to be low, but the transparency is choppy and not to mention the black lines are rather obnoxious looking. It's a beautiful image, just not feature quality. {{:User:Mandi/sig}} 23:04, June 30, 2011 (UTC) | ||
Line 672: | Line 672: | ||
#Whoa, that looks awesome. The smoke looks like a Floormaster a bit AND my favorite color is purple. I never knew they were called Treasure Spheres either. Epicly voting for this.- [[User:Itsameluigi1290|TriforceSlash]] 18:19, 12 May 2011 (EDT) | #Whoa, that looks awesome. The smoke looks like a Floormaster a bit AND my favorite color is purple. I never knew they were called Treasure Spheres either. Epicly voting for this.- [[User:Itsameluigi1290|TriforceSlash]] 18:19, 12 May 2011 (EDT) | ||
#Sheesh, man. I always see these and I '''have''' to slash at these whenever they appear from '''any''' enemies, it's just so surreal and beautiful looking, plus, you really and honestly don't know what will appear in the mystical/mysterious sphere, really. I vote for this, very, very much. '' '''[[User:Hylian Historic|Hylian Historic]]'' ''' 14:48, 3 June 2011 (EDT) | #Sheesh, man. I always see these and I '''have''' to slash at these whenever they appear from '''any''' enemies, it's just so surreal and beautiful looking, plus, you really and honestly don't know what will appear in the mystical/mysterious sphere, really. I vote for this, very, very much. '' '''[[User:Hylian Historic|Hylian Historic]]'' ''' 14:48, 3 June 2011 (EDT) | ||
{{ | {{Oppose}} | ||
#The quality isn't the best, and I think the picture is kind of odd. The smoke seems to have been taken from another shot. [[User:TriforcePieceofWisdom|TriforcePieceofWisdom]] 13:04, 22 June 2011 (EDT) | #The quality isn't the best, and I think the picture is kind of odd. The smoke seems to have been taken from another shot. [[User:TriforcePieceofWisdom|TriforcePieceofWisdom]] 13:04, 22 June 2011 (EDT) | ||
#The quality seems quite poor. The smoke does stand out quite a bit more than it ought to, it isn't the same quality as the rest of the image. It looks like it was just pasted over it, just tacked on after the fact, poorly. Several parts of the image are very blurry, which makes an unpleasant contrast with the parts that are very sharp. I just don't see how it stands out.{{:User:Matt/sig|~}} 05:23, July 21, 2011 (UTC) | #The quality seems quite poor. The smoke does stand out quite a bit more than it ought to, it isn't the same quality as the rest of the image. It looks like it was just pasted over it, just tacked on after the fact, poorly. Several parts of the image are very blurry, which makes an unpleasant contrast with the parts that are very sharp. I just don't see how it stands out.{{:User:Matt/sig|~}} 05:23, July 21, 2011 (UTC) | ||
Line 691: | Line 691: | ||
# Though small, this image still pulls off the look of a traditionally made collage flawlessly, with crisp colours and textures which really gives off that traditional storybook feel, brimming with legends to tell. Even with the restraints of the small "canvas", every detail has been carefully added and placed; you can still tell what story is being told. With an artistic flair, you cannot deny, this charming piece deserves a feature. [[User:Ochibi|Ochibi]] 06:16, 7 November 2011 (EST) | # Though small, this image still pulls off the look of a traditionally made collage flawlessly, with crisp colours and textures which really gives off that traditional storybook feel, brimming with legends to tell. Even with the restraints of the small "canvas", every detail has been carefully added and placed; you can still tell what story is being told. With an artistic flair, you cannot deny, this charming piece deserves a feature. [[User:Ochibi|Ochibi]] 06:16, 7 November 2011 (EST) | ||
{{ | {{Oppose}} | ||
#It's a good picture—one that certainly speaks volumes—but I don't think it's so special as to be worth featuring. Generally, when I look at any of our current featured pictures, I could stare at them for hours on end. This one is not particularly dazzling; one quick glance and you've seen all there is to see. {{:User:Hylian King/sig}} 07:25, 8 November 2011 (EST) | #It's a good picture—one that certainly speaks volumes—but I don't think it's so special as to be worth featuring. Generally, when I look at any of our current featured pictures, I could stare at them for hours on end. This one is not particularly dazzling; one quick glance and you've seen all there is to see. {{:User:Hylian King/sig}} 07:25, 8 November 2011 (EST) | ||
# I have to agree with Hylian King here. I do not see anything particularly iconic about this image. It seems the moment is not very memorable compared to other events in the game. There are better images represented in the same style as this one, too. It is not a bad image, but it is not Featured Picture worthy either. [[User:Noble Wrot|Noble Wrot]] 12:51, 17 December 2011 (EST) | # I have to agree with Hylian King here. I do not see anything particularly iconic about this image. It seems the moment is not very memorable compared to other events in the game. There are better images represented in the same style as this one, too. It is not a bad image, but it is not Featured Picture worthy either. [[User:Noble Wrot|Noble Wrot]] 12:51, 17 December 2011 (EST) | ||
Line 708: | Line 708: | ||
# This is image is supported by me because i think the Mirror Of Twilight is a very cool item also if you look at this picture it gives off kind of a rotating illusion.[[User:Sammoldy|Sammoldy]] 04:20, 3 November 2011 (EDT) | # This is image is supported by me because i think the Mirror Of Twilight is a very cool item also if you look at this picture it gives off kind of a rotating illusion.[[User:Sammoldy|Sammoldy]] 04:20, 3 November 2011 (EDT) | ||
# This is a very beautiful image, and it is not blurry or dark. Also, the main focus of the picture is the mirror, because there is no background to get in the way. --12:36, 23 October 2011 (EDT)[[User:Person777|Person777]] 12:36, 23 October 2011 (EDT) | # This is a very beautiful image, and it is not blurry or dark. Also, the main focus of the picture is the mirror, because there is no background to get in the way. --12:36, 23 October 2011 (EDT)[[User:Person777|Person777]] 12:36, 23 October 2011 (EDT) | ||
{{ | {{Oppose}} | ||
#While it looks OK in thumbnail view, I have to say I don't think the image quality is good enough to feature it. There's that weird black line around the inner edge. And the fact that it's angular instead of circular... Also, as a unique magical object, to me it's much more epic when it's actually doing it's thing than just sitting there as a flat surface. EDIT: Plus, [[:File:Mirror_of_Twilight.gif|this version]] is significantly better! {{:User:Adam/sig}} 02:27, 28 February 2012 (EST) | #While it looks OK in thumbnail view, I have to say I don't think the image quality is good enough to feature it. There's that weird black line around the inner edge. And the fact that it's angular instead of circular... Also, as a unique magical object, to me it's much more epic when it's actually doing it's thing than just sitting there as a flat surface. EDIT: Plus, [[:File:Mirror_of_Twilight.gif|this version]] is significantly better! {{:User:Adam/sig}} 02:27, 28 February 2012 (EST) | ||
#it's really blurry in the full view, plus the edges are a bit jagged--[[User:Themudkipman|Themudkipman]] 12:42, 22 May 2012 (EDT) | #it's really blurry in the full view, plus the edges are a bit jagged--[[User:Themudkipman|Themudkipman]] 12:42, 22 May 2012 (EDT) |
Revision as of 13:34, 7 June 2020
Failed Picture Nominations
The following sections are picture nominations which either expired or received a score of -3.
{{hide|header=PhantomHourglassscene13.png (Bellumbeck) — Failed on April 18, 2009 |content=
This picture is from the ending sequence of Phantom Hourglass. I think it's style is pretty neat.--Link hero of light 16:26, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
- This is a great picture showcasing the artstyle of Phantom Hourglass's cutscenes. I major Yes. -ATRUEZELDAFAN 13:32, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
- PH has no featured pictures yet, this is worthy on it it's own, it reflects the action and style of the game very nicely. Much more than being a nice image, it's the perfect example of what can be expected from Ph's innocent appearance and fearsome phantoms. User:Axiomist1875/sig 06:44, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
- An awesome picture, very stylish and cool looking. Also, a nice action scene. Axle the Beast 04:10, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
- I love this style and tried to do something like that, too. And therefore I can say that this picture is one of the best from the cutscences and not as simple, as it may seem. And also, if PH doesn't have any featured pictures yet, this is another point for it. --Nelde 18:39, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
- This is a really good picture from what is perhaps one of the best portable games ever. It shows all the dynamic emotion and styles that were used in the game, as well as how the boss is fought, in a sort of vauge way.--Petman1325 20:14, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
- The Phantom Hourglass cut out style is so unique!Corey Lord of Tacos! 02:02, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
- This image is incredibly small. It is much smaller than most of our currently featured images. Plus it is one image out of many that are very similar to it. Doesn't really strike me as awesome. Not compared to what we have.User:Matt/sig 21:47, April 15, 2009 (UTC)
- I agree with Matt. Although Bellumbeck is awesome, this cutout doesn't stand out from the others in my opinion and doesn't really seem like much compared to other nominees. Kind of droll really. Then there's the size. {{:User:Melchizedek1866/sig 04:12, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
- Bellumbeck would have made a good featured picture however, this image is incredibly small. Hardly eye catching or even interesting. Not really feature worthy.User:Mandi/sig 02:21, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
Size is reason enough to not vote for it, but hardly justifiable to Oppose an image. The Images above are all great but Opposition votes with the reason of "We already have several very similar images featured." would fit in the rules as stated above. Just bear that in mind before Failing this image. User:Axiomist1875/sig 04:23, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
I as well, will not oppose this image, we have had Phantom Hourglass nominations before. I'd hate to see this one fail because of my vote, but it's certainly not featured material. First of all, Link hero of light, when Matt and Mel told you the image is too small, they meant the image itself; increasing the thumbnail size will do no good. Also by "large", they mean LARGE at least 900px in height, and size of an image does matter (large images give the "wow factor"). Even in the guidelines it states "it's too low resolution" as one of the examples as a justifiable opposition.User:Steven2113/sig 20:31, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
}}
{{hide|header=Epona w link.png (Link with Epona) — Failed on October 1, 2009|content=
This is a very cool image that needs to be featured. There are not very many Epona pictures but I think this one is the best. It really captures the image of Ocarina of Time. It is very nicely drawn and old school. It needs to be featured.--Lt. Hammerspace 03:30, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
- Eh...my first and real gripe with this image is the quality. It seems choppy and the transparency job is rather poor. It's also rather uninteresting.User:Mandi/sig 04:39, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
- The transparency job is done badly, but the image also offers nothing special. It is rather stock-standard, not encapsulating any mood or interest. It doesn't draw people in. {{:User:Melchizedek1866/sig 04:11, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
- There are several visible leftovers from a quick and somewhat sloppy transparency job. The tail seems a little choppy and it looks like the sword is missing a few pixels. The tail and mane also look like parts are missing as well as having some background left over. As far as I'm concerned this isn't the highest of quality.User:Matt/sig 04:32, October 1, 2009 (UTC)
I absolutely love it. Great image. —Alter {T C B H } 05:37, 29 September 2009 (UTC)Vote withdrawn. —Alter {T C B H } 18:14, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
- Clean it up, and then we'll talk. Also, doesn't Link know it's dangerous to lean back on a horse while it's rearing? Noble Wrot 05:41, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
- The image doesn't look that great now that I know what it is. It's not bad, but not featured quality. —Alter {T C B H } 18:14, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
}}