Talk:Bomb: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
So, if you've noticed, I made a major change in the page. So... is it ok? I additionally merged the Water Bombs, Remote Bomb, and Remote Bombs (yes, there were two, and one was one line long!) into here. I'm thinking of merging bomb flowers, bombchus, and bomblings here too... Do you think it's ok, or do they deserve a page for themselves? --Memo326 | So, if you've noticed, I made a major change in the page. So... is it ok? I additionally merged the Water Bombs, Remote Bomb, and Remote Bombs (yes, there were two, and one was one line long!) into here. I'm thinking of merging bomb flowers, bombchus, and bomblings here too... Do you think it's ok, or do they deserve a page for themselves? --Memo326 | ||
Well I'm okay with it, but I'm not really in charge. the only problem would be Bombchus. I think they should stay as its own article, because while it is a bomb it is unique enough to be a separate article I guess.--[[User:Green Tunic|Green]] 02:40, 28 December 2007 (EST) | :Well I'm okay with it, but I'm not really in charge. the only problem would be Bombchus. I think they should stay as its own article, because while it is a bomb it is unique enough to be a separate article I guess.--[[User:Green Tunic|Green]] 02:40, 28 December 2007 (EST) | ||
::I can't see a reason why bomb flower and bombling shouldn't be merged here, I'd go with Green on keeping Bombchu separate though. (P.S I'm not really in charge either, this is a wiki after all!) --[[User:Adamcox82|Adam]] 14:29, 28 December 2007 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 19:29, 28 December 2007
sorry wrong wiki Cipriano 119 19:03, 1 February 2007 (CST)
Major change
So, if you've noticed, I made a major change in the page. So... is it ok? I additionally merged the Water Bombs, Remote Bomb, and Remote Bombs (yes, there were two, and one was one line long!) into here. I'm thinking of merging bomb flowers, bombchus, and bomblings here too... Do you think it's ok, or do they deserve a page for themselves? --Memo326
- Well I'm okay with it, but I'm not really in charge. the only problem would be Bombchus. I think they should stay as its own article, because while it is a bomb it is unique enough to be a separate article I guess.--Green 02:40, 28 December 2007 (EST)
- I can't see a reason why bomb flower and bombling shouldn't be merged here, I'd go with Green on keeping Bombchu separate though. (P.S I'm not really in charge either, this is a wiki after all!) --Adam 14:29, 28 December 2007 (EST)