Talk:Jabun: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
I read the article and noticed that it had been added too since the last time I read it. However most the information is fan speculation added on more and more with each edit... I just want people to tell me if they think it is really improving the article. Much of the zora/rito debate, which was talked about above has been brought in...--[[User:Magnus orion|Magnus orion]] 17:56, 31 March 2008 (EDT) | I read the article and noticed that it had been added too since the last time I read it. However most the information is fan speculation added on more and more with each edit... I just want people to tell me if they think it is really improving the article. Much of the zora/rito debate, which was talked about above has been brought in...--[[User:Magnus orion|Magnus orion]] 17:56, 31 March 2008 (EDT) | ||
:Well, it is marked with the theory tag now.{{:User: | :Well, it is marked with the theory tag now.{{:User:Matt/sig}} <span style="color:#C0C0C0;">21:46, October 31, 2008 (UTC)</span> | ||
Revision as of 08:20, 18 November 2008
Zora -> Rito evolution theory
Considering the monumental debate that this topic caused on the Rito article, might it be better if this topic wasn't discussed here, and rather that the article simply linked to the relevant section of Rito? —Adam (talk) 13:08, 5 March 2008 (EST)
Editing of the Article
I read the article and noticed that it had been added too since the last time I read it. However most the information is fan speculation added on more and more with each edit... I just want people to tell me if they think it is really improving the article. Much of the zora/rito debate, which was talked about above has been brought in...--Magnus orion 17:56, 31 March 2008 (EDT)
- Well, it is marked with the theory tag now.User:Matt/sig 21:46, October 31, 2008 (UTC)